It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נא,א גמרא

??? my slave priests they were these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Yosei says: ??? the house of ??? the house of ??? they were that were marry off their daughters into the priesthood R' Chaninah son of ??? says ??? they were Is this not In this case, ??? for he said: slaves they were his reasoning is the essence a song ??? and the one who said ??? they were his reasoning is the essence a song in a vessel ??? Rabbi Yosei What then is the reasoning of If his reasoning is the essence a song ??? even slaves also If his reasoning is the essence a song in a vessel ??? yes. ??? No. except everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world the essence a song ??? In this case, ??? reasoned thus it was. It once happened and one master reasons that thus it was. It once happened for what practical distinction ??? The one who said slaves they were his reasoning is We do not elevate ??? and not ??? and the one who said Israel they were his reasoning is elevate ??? but not ??? and the one who said ??? they were his reasoning is elevate ??? between ??? between ??? And Rabbi Yirmiyah bar Abba he said It is a disagreement ??? of ??? of R' Yosi son of Yehudah reasoned happiness ??? also ??? the Sabbath And the rabbbis reason that happiness ??? It is not ??? the Sabbath but: ??? of sacrifice the words of all are the blessing of the Service She ??? the Sabbath They challenged him from this teaching: ??? of ??? the Sabbath these are the words of Rabbi Yosei son of Yehudah But the sages say: Even Yom Tov (holiday) he does not ??? of Rav Yosef ??? Let us say, ??? of ??? he ??? but: ??? of sacrifice the words of all are ??? the Sabbath Let us say, ??? of Rav Yosef ??? Rav would say to you Joseph ??? of ??? and it is the law ??? and that one ??? of ??? to make you acknowledge the strength of his argument of R' Yosi son of Yehudah that even ??? also ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: ??? of the house of ??? that is not ??? not the Sabbath and not Yom Tov (holiday) ??? but: ??? with whom does it agree? If you were to say Rabbi Yosei son of Yehudah Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say of ??? also ??? except Is this not rabbis ??? of Rav Yosef ??? What is the reason? ??? for he said: the essence a song in a vessel As it is written (II Chron. 29) and he said Hezekiyah ??? The elevation-offering ??? and In an hour of ??? The elevation-offering ??? Hashem ??? by way of lit., through the hands of implements of ??? a king Israel What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? for he said: the essence a song ??? As it is written (II Chron. 5) And it was ??? the voice of one And the other one also this one it is written and he said Hezekiyah thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? Hashem ??? by way of lit., through the hands of implements of ??? a king Israel ??? And the other one also this one it is written And it was ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? is equivalent ??? Just as ??? in a vessel Even ??? in a vessel

דף נא,א משנה

who that did not have he saw ??? the house of ??? No. he saw happiness ??? the first Yom Tov of the Holiday of Sukkot They descended ??? women ??? in that place ??? The greatness ??? of gold they were in that place and four ??? of gold ??? and four ??? for all one and one and four ??? the priesthood ??? of hundred and twenty ??? that are ??? for all ??? priests ??? from them they were ??? of them they were ??? and not he was a courtyward in Jerusalem that is not ??? illumination. the house of ??? and the men of It once happened they were ???

דף נא,ב משנה

??? of light ??? and say before them these are the words of ??? ??? and in a vessel ??? without ??? on ??? ten ??? Israel ??? women opposite ??? ten ??? is upon them ??? they stand in a vessel ??? and say a song and they stand two priests ??? Israel ??? women and a second person ??? he read ??? is more ??? ??? to the earth ??? they were ??? and they walk until ??? that is coming out ??? that is coming out ??? And they said ??? that were in this place ??? to ??? to the east ??? to the east ??? and do we for him ??? R' Yehuda says: they were ??? do we for him for him ???

דף נא,ב גמרא

The Rabbis taught who that did not have he saw ??? the house of ??? No. he saw happiness ??? who that did not have he saw Jerusalem ??? No. he saw ??? Always, who that did not have he saw ??? No. he saw ??? Always, Who is it Abayye said: (and there are those who say Rav Chisda this ??? in what way ??? he said ??? that it is possible that they said ??? so that thus it will be ??? reasoned ??? And they said to him rabbis ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ??? It was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says who that did not have he saw ??? of ??? of Egypt" No. he saw ??? of Israel And they said ??? a bascilica that is large it was ??? within ??? occasions that were of it ??? on ??? Egypt" ??? that were in that place ??? Egypt" And there are those who say it was ??? and there were in that place ??? of gold opposite ??? of ??? that is large all One and one It is not ??? than twenty and one ??? gold or a platform of wood ??? upon it ??? in his hand And because of the fact arrived ??? "Amen" ??? and all the nation they answer "Amen" and not they were they sit ??? except ??? before ??? before ??? before ??? before ??? before ??? enter in that place he was ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of and From here ??? the men of his house Abayye said: and all of them ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? It is because of this: ??? he read (Deut. 17) No. ??? on the way ??? any more and they ??? they came For he came ??? where they did ??? (Deut. 28) ??? Hashem upon you nation --- ??? he said ??? There was this guy he is required to come. ??? in a case where there are ten ??? and comes ??? stillborn lit., fallen upon them ??? Yom Tov (holiday) ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? The greatness Rabbi Eliezer said ??? that we have learned ??? it was in the first, ??? and they ordered ??? women ??? upwards and men downwards The rabbis taught: in the first, they were women ??? and men ??? they were shall come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? the tip of they ordered ??? women ??? and men ??? they were have come to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? the tip of they ordered ??? women ??? upwards and men downwards in what way does does he act? thus For it is written (I Chron. 28) The entirety in writing immediately Hashem by the ??? Rav said he read ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.