It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף יד,א גמרא

Hey, isn't it the case that ??? ark If it was It is because of this: ark Is this not ??? he words ??? The tanna teaches: words ??? No. The tanna teaches: Rav Ashi said ??? also ??? where he teaches Just as these ??? on ??? except ??? ??? but: in all ??? both this and this they agree And if you would say Here in this case, also, a Tanna taught: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Just as these The tanna teaches: ??? Just as these ??? he Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to it ark If it was It is because of this: ark Is this not ??? he It is because of this: that he came He accounts for to it ??? Now that you have come to this understanding, you can apply the same understanding to this other problem: twenty and four also Is this not ??? he where he teaches to it ??? What then do we do about it? Rav said Shmuel son of ??? and thus Rav said Chiyya son of ??? Rav said between ??? to the healer and Rav Ashi said: in the name of Rabbi ??? the son of Rabbi Yishmael ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? One teaching ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? And another teaching ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? And another teaching yes. ??? No. ??? and not ??? Rav Ashi said ??? into your hand ??? Just as these ??? on ??? except ??? ??? in what way ??? Rav Yehudah he said ??? and Rav Yehudah the son of of Rav Shmuel son of ??? in the name of Rav he said ??? The one who said ??? did not say ??? and the one who said ??? did not say ??? For it was taught: yes. ??? on the community regarding them the Eighteen i.e., the Amidah ??? and The sign of the thing Jericho and Jericho ??? it was. ??? for one for he said: ??? except ??? everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world does not disagree ??? to it ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? one master reasons that a seminal emission to it ??? and one master reasons that No. a seminal emission to it ??? all the more so ??? but: ??? No. For it was taught: but the remainder of all varieties of ??? For example, ??? ??? No. they were ??? except ??? She as it is taught: on these ??? on Shabbat on a city ??? or river and on ??? in the sea R' Yosi he said ??? but not ??? in what way Shall I say ??? on Shabbat who Sarai except Is this not ??? a seminal emission to it ??? with two with R' Yehudah ??? it was. ???

דף יד,ב גמרא

??? three ten ??? and not ??? reasoned ??? He said to him: R' Ami Behold! And they said yes. ??? the community -- more than enough he said R' Abba -- the son of Rabbi Chiyya son of Abba Rabbi Ami ??? he ??? except Thus said R' Chiyya bar Abba R' Yochanan said: They did not teach such a ruling except ??? but: ??? varieties of ??? and they walk until ??? from the heavens Another teaching is like this: ??? three ??? "satisfied" Watch out for leading vav And they did not say except ??? but: ??? varieties of ??? and they walk until ??? Let us say, ??? For R' Ami He could say to you Rabbi Ami ??? She as it is taught: yes. ??? -- more ??? ten ??? on the community on account of that do not ??? the community -- more than enough these are the words of Rabbi Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says No. from the Name is this except because of that went out ??? of ??? for him My son, ??? to Rabbi For example, We that even ??? in the case of ??? in what way does ??? or ??? prayer or ??? and in the blessing of the years ??? them ??? prayer They challenged him from this teaching: Rabbi Yehuda said when does the previous statement apply? at a time i.e., in a case ??? and a Jew lit, Israel ??? on ??? but: in these times (nowadays) The entirety on account of ??? The entirety on account of ??? The entirety on account of ??? He said to him: ??? upon it of Rabbi Rabbi a Tanna taught: he ??? What then do we do about it? Rav ??? he said in the blessing of the years Watch out for leading vav And Rav Sheishet said ??? prayer And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? with two reclining with ??? all the day because of honor ??? They posed this difficulty: in what way does The tanna teaches: ??? reclining with ??? and in Hashem. all the day because of honor the Sabbath or perhaps, with two reclining ??? all the day all of it Come and hear: as it is taught: with two reclining until the evening ??? all the day all of it because of honor the Sabbath they were to him two openings "He opens one ??? one he was to him ??? opposite ??? "He opens according to his way and does not ??? these and not ??? by being carried and the giving of ??? a Tanna taught: ??? of happiness ??? of happiness If it was ??? of happiness this the act of building the house of ??? for his son Which is it ??? of happiness this ??? of ??? The rabbis taught: a fellowship yes. ??? peace ??? with me" the land ??? we make him repeat to them ??? the tip of there are. ??? they sit ??? a person ??? to the place until ??? upon them from the heavens R' Eliezer said yes. a person ??? permission ??? on his face But rather, if so, ??? son of ??? as it is said (Josh. 7) and he said Hashem to Joshua to arise to you For what reason this you ??? on Your face and R' Eliezer said yes. a person ??? permission ??? a sack But rather, if so, ??? son of ??? as it is said (II Kings 6) And it was ??? the king these are the words of the his wife ??? ??? This is only in the case transgresses on the walls fears the nation and behold ??? on ??? etc. and R' Eliezer said No. The entirety ??? and not The entirety ??? Moses ??? Joshua ??? Moses ??? As it is written (Num. 14) ??? Moses ??? on ??? Joshua ??? As it is written (Num. 14) and Joshua bin Nun ??? son of ??? He disagreed with this R' Zeira (and there are those who say R' Shmuel son of Nachmeni If it was it was. it is written Joshua ??? now As it is written Joshua this one Hey, isn't it the case that does he act? and R' Eliezer said No. The entirety ??? and not The entirety ??? kings ??? kings ??? As it is written (Is. 49) Thus he said Hashem ??? Israel ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.