It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קא,א גמרא

they were both priests ??? The rabbis taught: ??? this and he returned ??? this ??? this and he returned ??? this ??? both "At the same time," ??? both "At the same time," he is liable Rabbi Yehudah says "At the same time," he is liable "In the case of this one after that one," is exempt For it was taught: Rabbi Yehudah says is exempt "At the same time," it is a case of two different Tanaaim who follow the reasoning ??? of Rabbi Yehudah What is the reason? ??? he said Rabbi ??? it is said blessing to the bottom and it is said blessing is more Just as is more where there is not in it ??? Even to the bottom where there is not in it ??? and ascend ??? And so based on this lit: from after, ??? For what reason an elevation-offering For what reason an elevation-offering Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say a commandment except He ascended No. The tanna teaches: except an elevation-offering the master of ??? Rav Acha said son of ??? Abayye said: he said abbi Assi R' Yochanan said: It is because of this: ??? and if they were both ??? what is the difference here, two the watch-periods that is not ??? about this teaching a watch-period ??? for him and it comes about this teaching a watch-period ??? for him the rotating watch-group (mishmar) one also Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes for this the house of ??? for him Rav Pappa said: thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: if they were both the rotating watch-group (mishmar) one the house of ??? one take a portion one

דף קא,א משנה

the commandments chalitza in a case where there are three ??? and even ??? is valid ??? is invalid ??? in which there is to him ??? is valid and those that do not to him ??? is invalid, from ??? to the bottom chalitza is valid from ??? and onwards chalitza is invalid ??? that do not are his or ??? of wood or ??? chalitza is valid ??? that he was It is possible ??? in it or in the case of a child. that he was ??? most of ??? is valid.

דף קא,א גמרא

and based on this lit: from after, that even three ??? why do I have Thus can we come and learn from this. ??? in a case where there are three ??? similar to ??? about this teaching For the Rabbis taught the commandments chalitza in a case where there are three ??? similar to ??? Rabbi Yehudah says in five What is the reason מאי טעמא of the first tanna? as it is taught: elders two And there is no meaning to the word a court ??? they add about them any more one Behold! here, three And R' Yehudah the elders of two elders two And there is no meaning to the word a court ??? they add about them any more one Behold! here, Hashem And the first tanna This the elders of What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? even three ??? And Rabbi Yehudah ??? for him ??? for him ??? As Mar said: ??? creates an exclusion ??? Learn from this that even ??? For if it was You might have thought the Sanhedrin in the case of why do I have ??? Rav Yosef ??? For Rav learned: Joseph in the same way ??? thus in the same way a court בית דין ??? from all ???

דף קא,ב גמרא

as it is said (Song of Songs 4) ??? proper ??? yes. about You And the other one This certain individual ??? What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him This certain individual ??? he who has arrived for he said: Raba It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? that was coming out ??? As it is written ??? the elders ??? And the other one also should bring himself ??? yes. So, here, So rather, ??? for him ??? Israel all ??? And the other one This Israel What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself ??? Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah ??? of Israel and not ??? of is destiny? ??? And the other one ??? other than this it is written And the other one should bring himself to account for that which was taught R' Yehudah said: One time we were they sit before Rabbi ??? and she entered ??? and he said to us ??? And the other one ??? Except I can object with text from here: and they read two and His word two Here, too, according to R' Yehudah Behold! here, nine According to the sages, Behold! here, seven This certain individual should bring himself to account for that which was taught and they read to him and not ??? and His word ??? This teaches ??? to him ??? to him ??? he was he ??? but it ??? he an elderly person but it she gave birth to say to him Just as to you next to she gave birth to Just as to you next to ??? next to ??? and do not ??? Rabba said: ??? The halacha is chalitza in a case where there are three Because ??? to us a Tanna taught: ??? Raba said to him ??? If so, ??? also For it was taught in a baraita ??? in a case where there are three And if you would say Here, too, For it was taught: ??? The academy of Shammai say: a court בית דין ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? or in the case that one is not ??? both these and these: "We thank..." ??? three R' Yosi ??? Yehudah and R' Elazar the son of Rabbi Yosi validate it with the passage of the requisite number of years and Rav Yosef said son of ??? Rav Nachman said The halacha is ??? there i.e., in another mishna one ??? and here in this other case, two ??? there i.e., in another mishna also two ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? or ??? in his face, ??? because it was ??? except there i.e., in another mishna two ??? Here in this case, three ??? this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? What do I have to learn from one ??? What do I have to learn from two ??? What do I have to learn from three except Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Because ??? in a place It is a disagreement For it was taught in a baraita ??? elders ??? in a case where there are three these are the words of R' Yosi R' Yehuda says: in five ??? in a case where there are three and not ??? R' Yehudah Learn from this he returns of him. R' Yehudah ??? Rabba said: It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? cases As it is written (Deut. 25) and is credited lit, rises ??? to the elders Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua my slave ??? in five like who like R' Yehudah Hey, isn't it the case that he returns of him. ??? the validity Rav Ashi ??? my heart Rav Kahana He said to him: ??? Master, ??? among five Rav said ??? it was. in the presence of Rav Yehudah And he said to me come ??? among five They said to him: why do I have five He said to them so that thus it will be ??? the validity Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah it was. he arises in front of Rav Yehudah He said to him: ??? come ??? among five ??? the validity He said to him: ??? Israel and not ??? of is destiny? ??? and I ??? I Rav Yehudah said For example, Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? two witnesses the Merciful One in the Torah says except ??? Rabba said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.