It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קו,א גמרא

The rabbis taught: chalitza ??? is valid Which is it chalitza ??? he said Reish Lakish: all for they would say to him ??? and objection you he marries her. Rabbi Yochanan said to him: I he learns Mishna between ??? he and not ??? She between ??? She and not ??? he ??? is invalid until ??? both ??? and is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? except all for they would say to him ??? to it ??? to you two hundred zuz Another teaching is like this: chalitza ??? Which is it chalitza ??? all for they would say ??? to it in order ??? to you two hundred zuz And it once happened ??? One ??? before ??? that do not he is acceptable to it and They said to him: ??? to it in order ??? to you two hundred zuz came It once happened before Rabbi Chiyya ??? This certain individual who has arrived in front of Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba he said to it houses the pillars he said for him I would say ??? This is ??? he said to it you knew. for him he said for him yes. ??? he that he saw to it ??? he said to it No. it's settled. to you he said for him did not say to him ??? to it and objection you he marries her. ??? to it He said to him: now ??? to it ??? to it chalitza that is elevated i.e., important so that thus it will be ??? the daughter of ??? of Rav ??? "She has fallen before ??? that do not he is acceptable to it he came in front ??? He said to him: ??? to it and objection you he marries her. He said to him: Rav ??? Do you not derive from this, Master, about this teaching for he said: Rabbi Yochanan So rather, in what way does I would say for him He said to him: ??? to it ??? to you two hundred zuz ??? to it he said to it ??? Give for him He said to him: ??? I about You ??? for him who was not taught? Behold! that he was ??? from the house of incarceration it was ??? before him He said to him: ??? he (except) does not have his worth Perhaps, He said to him: ??? I about You Here in this case, also, ??? I about You He said to him: your father: in a case He said to him ??? in a case He said to him ??? he will give in them? the eye of ??? The Rabbis taught chalitza ??? is valid writ ??? is invalid, chalitza ??? is invalid writ ??? is valid How so? If it was for he said: ??? I Even if chalitza also and if did not say ??? I writ also No. thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: chalitza ??? In reality lit: In the world is valid and writ ??? In reality lit: In the world is invalid, chalitza ??? and writ ??? Oftentimes is valid Oftentimes is invalid, this one for he said: ??? I this one that is not he said ??? I as it is taught: (Lev. 22) ??? that specific This teaches ??? that specific It is possible the master of ??? Scripture states: ??? How so? ??? that specific until ??? I and thus you "one who finds" ??? women ??? that specific until ??? I Rabba said: Rav Sahorah said: Rav Huna said ??? despite the fact that do not ??? despite the fact that do not ??? For this reason yes. ??? writ chalitza But rather, if so, ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? writ ??? But rather, if so, ??? to the court ??? and Raba that are his says yes. ??? But rather, if so, ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? unless it is ??? For this reason ??? writ chalitza even though that do not ??? writ ??? even though that do not ??? and not there is a fear of them. to the court ???

דף קו,ב משנה

the commandments chalitza came he ??? to the court there are. marry off their daughters to him ??? to him as it is said (Deut. 25) and they read to him the elders of ??? and His word ??? and She says one ??? his brothers? in that place ??? No. ??? and he says No. ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use they would say ??? the elders ??? from by ??? in his face, ??? and he said ??? may he do it? ??? who No. ??? the house of ??? Up to this point, they were ??? Rabbi ??? under ??? all the parasha (scriptural section) ??? to be They complete all the parasha (scriptural section) is called was his name ??? the house of ??? a commandment ??? and not a commandment ??? Rabbi Yehudah says a commandment on all those who are standing in that place to say ???

דף קו,ב גמרא

Rav Yehudah said the commandments chalitza ??? and read. ??? What then does it mean when it says Come and hear from this. ??? She Watch out for leading vav And hey, you can also come and hear from this. a commandment thus and if ??? we do not have an objection to it. Another teaching is like this: between ??? chalitza ??? or whether ??? spitting ??? Just as the one who did ??? Abayye said: And if one ??? writ chalitza No. to recite it. ??? No. ??? except No. ??? and not to recite it. for him No. ??? except No. ??? Rava said: ??? the validity She ??? the validity we do not have an objection to it. Rav Ashi he found for Rav, ??? to it No. ??? He said to him: No. reasoned for him Master, about this teaching of Raba He said to him: give thanks Raba without ??? Abayye said: And if one ??? thus ??? from one ??? until ??? for him from No. until ??? from ??? and until ??? Mar Zutra ??? and then it is written ??? parasha (scriptural section) He disagreed with this Master, son of This Hey, isn't it the case that No. ??? And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? of Mar Zutra Abayye said: ??? No. ??? and not anything What is the reason? ??? in his face, in the case of Therefore, he ??? but it ??? that it is possible in his face, She long This is only in the case ??? in the case of until ??? his face and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes Rabba said: ??? No. ??? and not anything What is the reason? ??? in the case of there is not in this case. Rabba said: It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. ??? For he departs ??? As it is written ??? the elders ??? is called was his name ??? the house of ??? a commandment ??? and not ??? It was taught: R' Yehudah said: One time we were they sit before Rabbi ??? and he said to us ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.