It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קז,א משנה

The academy of Shammai say: yes. ??? except ??? but the academy of Hillel say: ??? the academy of Shammai say ??? and not ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? the academy of Shammai say in his face, but the academy of Hillel say: in his face, or in the case that one is not in his face, the academy of Shammai say ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? or in the case that one is not ??? And they said to them The academy of Hillel ??? but it a small one even four And Hashem occasions And the academy of Shammai said to them to the academy of Hillel yes. the daughters of Israel ??? except ??? until ???

דף קז,א גמרא

Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said What is the reason? of the academy of Shammai? on account of that do not ??? and if ??? will come to say there are ??? and not ??? What is there to say? on account of that do not ??? for those who are emissaries of ??? What is there to say? No. ??? rabbis and the academy of Hillel ??? a small one is a law established by the Rabbis ??? Rabbah and Rav Yosef; who both say The reason is of the academy of Shammai? on account of that do not a person makes ??? and not ??? What is there to say? No. it's settled. for him ??? for those who are emissaries of ??? What is there to say? No. ??? rabbis and the academy of Hillel immediately That there are ??? and her ketuba No. they came to say ??? Rav Papa said, The reason is for the academy of Shammai It is because of this: ??? The reason is ??? It is because of this: ??? The reason is for the academy of Shammai It is because of this: ??? For if it was is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? them ??? the end of to depart ??? and the academy of Hillel ??? immediately that you said ??? them reasoned For if it was No. ??? to it ??? to it of him Rava said: we were The reason is for the academy of Shammai that do not a person a burden in the case of a meal ??? And the academy of Hillel both of them. it's settled. them so that ??? upon them ??? the academy of Shammai say ??? said Rabbi Osha'ya ??? It is not ??? Rav Chisdah said What is the reason? of Rabbi ??? No. ??? Consider this case: ???

דף קז,ב גמרא

??? except ??? ??? He ascended No. ??? he said ??? Even ??? What is the reason? ??? Raba ??? all ??? for one and not ??? and not ??? But why? ??? now ??? that I for it teaches: pointed out a contradiction. son of ??? it is permitted. ??? forbidden ??? Perhaps, in the hour of ??? Here in this case, also, in the hour of ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter Rav said ??? in this forbidden to this something ??? Is this not immediately ??? to it ??? them ??? Here in this case, also, there is no difference And Shmuel said ??? in this it is permitted. to this and not is comparable ??? he that he came does he act? of it Here in this case, She ??? of him. that which she said No. ??? about You and not ??? about You about You he that is not ??? this one ??? Rav ??? he said ??? in this it is permitted. even to him Let us say, like Rabbi ??? he reasons for himself. for he said: It is not ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? Here, too, ??? Here in this case, with two ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? For he came ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? in this it is permitted. ??? but they did not agree with him one they did not agree with him Abayye said: Rav Rava said: Rabbi ??? And there are those who say it was Rav ??? The academy of Shammai say: in his face, ??? It was taught: And they said to them the academy of Hillel ??? Is it not the case that ??? his wife that did not have in his face, And they said to them the academy of Shammai to the academy of Hillel ??? For this reason ??? to him ??? This is obvious! ??? She ??? the academy of Shammai ??? No. ??? two ??? his male slave ??? The academy of Shammai say: before a court ??? It was taught there: ??? in a case where there are three Which Tanna taught: Rabbah said the academy of Shammai She Abaye said Even if you say the academy of Hillel Up to this point, No. ??? the academy of Hillel except that is not in the case of ??? but: three in the case of As it is taught: The academy of Shammai say: before a court And the academy of Hillel say before a court or in the case that one is not before a court and both these and these: "We thank..." ??? three Rabbi Yosei son of Yehudah and Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon validate it with the passage of the requisite number of years Rav Yosef said son of ??? Rav Nachman said The halacha is ??? The academy of Shammai say: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? one ??? Shmuel said until ??? and shall you say ??? I ??? that are the first ??? he said both The tanna teaches: or ??? or ??? This is satisfactory ??? we were where he teaches until ??? except ??? until ??? and shall you say should bring himself it is a problem

דף קז,ב משנה

Which is it a small one ??? for one all ??? cubits ??? that did not have ??? It is not it requires for one Rabbi ??? son of ??? says all ??? that is not would find it possible to watch ??? It is not it requires for one R' Elazar says yes. It once happened a small one anything except ??? A daughter of Israel ??? It may not be eaten from terumah the daughter of a priest to Israel It may be eaten from terumah Rabbi Eliezer son of Ya'akov says all ??? that it from Watch out for leading vav "and the man it is as if She his wife all ??? that is not from Watch out for leading vav "and the man it is as if It is not his wife

דף קז,ב גמרא

Rav Yehudah said -- and others say it is in a baraita -- in the first, they were ??? writ ??? No. ??? of him. and not ??? of him. ??? I ??? for him immediately ??? They said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.