It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קט,א משנה

and Rabbi Eliezer ??? and thus ??? ??? and He returned it it is permitted. ??? and Rabbi Eliezer ??? a small one ??? and He returned it the words of all are forbidden ???

דף קט,א גמרא

he said ??? What is the reason? of Rabbi ??? Because ??? upon it one hour ??? And they said to him rabbis ??? If so, chalitza also No. ??? And if you say Here, too, For it was taught: It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer And they said ??? except he said ??? R' Elazar No. ??? What is the reason? Abayye said: we were The reason is of Rabbi ??? from doubt for him If it was death ??? If it was ??? that are the first ??? If it was death ??? this one ??? in front ??? If it was ??? that are the first ??? this one ??? upon it one hour ??? Rava said: In reality lit: In the world This is obvious! to Rabbi ??? The entirety ??? And there is no meaning to the word The entirety ??? immediately ??? it has ??? Are we are not dealing ??? Rav Ashi said: we were The reason is of Rabbi ??? Behold! It is because of this: ??? and He returned it Here, too, ??? When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, a small one ??? and He returned it the words of all are ??? This what is there to say? This is obvious! except Is this not Thus can we come and learn from this. The reason is For R' ??? It is because of this: This Learn from this This teaching is consistent with the position of Rav ??? "We thank..." the sages for R' Eliezer ??? Behold! She ??? and He returned it ??? because of ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? In what matters are we saying this? whom he had divorced ??? a small one and He returned it ??? a small one but: ??? a small one and He returned it ??? that is large So, too, He returned it ??? a small one ??? opposite him. did he die or ??? or ??? It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer And they said ??? and not ??? Raba brought this very question ??? What then? He said to him: She ??? and We ??? and this was taught! It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer And they said She ??? She ??? You might have thought except Is this not or She or ??? Is this not ??? thus She ??? or ??? or ???

דף קט,א משנה

two ??? to have two ??? did he die ??? of One from them ??? It is because of this: ??? a woman and thus two ??? that is large and a small one did he die ??? of a small one ??? a minor female It is because of this: ??? a woman did he die ??? of that is large Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? a minor female ??? in it Rabban Gamliel says: if ??? And if not, ??? until ??? It is because of this: ??? a woman Rabbi Yehoshua says: If it was to him on his wife If it was to him on ??? sent forth his wife ???

דף קט,א גמרא

and who Sarai ??? bar-Kappara In reality lit: In the world ??? a person in a case where there are three items ??? from three items ??? in a case where there are three items ??? peace ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering ??? from three items from ??? and from ??? and from ??? of a commandment ??? Back to the main body of the text: It was taught by bar-Kappara In reality lit: In the world ??? a person in a case where there are three items ??? the grave as it is taught: Abba Shaul says: the one who marries ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an ornament for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of Another thing: it is as if ??? in my eyes." to be ??? a mamzer ??? peace As it is written (Ps. 34) seek peace and pursue it

דף קט,ב גמרא

and he said Rabbi Abahu We come to compare ??? It is written here (Ps. 34) seek peace and pursue it And it is written there (Prov. 21) "One who pursues justice and lovingkindness, he shall find life, justice ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering like Rabbi he gave as it is taught: Rabbi Natan says ??? it is as if he built a bamah an elevated place for offerings. ??? it is as if he sacrificed upon it sacrifice ??? from three items from ??? Perhaps ??? of it from ??? For ??? he is equivalent. from ??? for thus said Rabbi Isaac What then does it mean that it is written (Prov. 11) evil" ??? For evening ??? evil after evil ??? is destiny? ??? ??? himself for a matter of The halacha is ??? is destiny? ??? ??? for he said: R' ??? is destiny? ??? to Israel ??? himself for a matter of The halacha is as it is taught: Rabbi Yosei says: all One who says he (Torah) does not have he (Torah) does not have This is obvious! except all One who says he (except) does not have Torah he (except) does not have Torah Here, too, This is obvious! except that even Torah he (What is the reason?) does not have Rav Pappa said: Scripture states: (Deut. 5) "And you shall teach them" ??? all ??? all that is not ??? he does not ??? And if you wish, I would say In reality lit: In the world ??? from the beginning all One who says he (except) does not have Torah he (except) does not have Torah it is not necessary to teach this that he came the completion ??? and my slave What would you have said? it has The reward for him Come and learn from this. And if you wish, I would say ??? himself for a matter of The halacha is ??? judgement in front ??? The halacha is ??? the validity ??? it has Rabbah and not Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes asks for he said: Rabbi Shmuel son of Nachmeni he said Rabbi ??? In reality lit: In the world He will see ??? himself it is as if ??? to him between ??? and Gehinna (hell) ??? to him ??? as it is said (Song of Songs 3) there are his bed ??? round and round to it ??? Israel etc. who is frightened in the nights who is frightened of Gehinna (hell) ??? Rabban Gamliel says if ??? Rabbi Eliezer brought this very question ??? What is the reason? ??? It is because of this: that thus reasoned ??? a small one ??? And so ??? even though that is not the master of or, perhaps, It is because of this: that thus reasoned ??? and the halacha is to it If it was the master of yes. If it was No. the master of did not say to him we were The reason is ??? It is because of this: that thus reasoned ??? and the halacha is to it If it was the master of yes. If it was No. the master of did not say Rav Sheishet I thought to say For ??? Rav said: about this teaching ??? as it is taught: ??? a minor female ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? Is this not For ??? and even though that is not the master of He said to him: ??? the son of of Rav ??? this one the validity ??? hangs ??? If it was the master of yes. If it was No. the master of No. that which she said he is preferable ??? and I ??? of him reasoned Rav If it was the master of yes. If it was No. the master of No. Hey, isn't it the case that it was said: a small one that did not have ??? and gets married Rav said: It is not it requires writ ??? And Shmuel said it requires writ ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.