It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קי,א גמרא

Is this not that is not the master of No. ??? If it was ??? What is the reason? of Shmuel his reasoning is all ??? on the understanding of ??? that are the first he ??? Hey, isn't it the case that They disagreed about this, one ??? on ??? Rav said: it requires from him writ And Shmuel said It is not it requires from him writ Rav said: it requires from him writ immediately ??? And Shmuel said It is not it requires from him writ all ??? on the understanding of ??? that are the first he ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements For if it only stated this particular ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Rav It is because of this: That there are ??? And because of the fact ??? but: In this case, I would say give thanks for him ??? And if it was said In this case, ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Shmuel but: ??? I would say give thanks for him for Rav, Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements And who said it? Rav For the master of yes. If it was No. the master of No. Hey, isn't it the case that this particular ??? a small one ??? and he came other than this ??? of him Rav ??? and Rav Chanan'el the students of Rav are they, there i.e., in another mishna and not ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Rav Ashi said: he One who acts that did not have ??? For this reason they make in it that did not have ??? rabbis ??? of him Ravina said to Rav Ashi: this accounts ??? made kiddush, ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? rabbis ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Eliezer and thus Rabbi Eliezer said The halacha is like Rabbi Eliezer

דף קי,א משנה

whoever was ??? to have two ??? did he die ??? or ??? of One from them ??? and thus two ??? a small one ??? yes. ??? One from them ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? ??? that is large and a small one ??? an adult female ??? a minor female And there is no meaning to the word ??? a minor female ??? an adult female

דף קי,א גמרא

??? the daughter of chalitza She For it was taught in a mishna: A deaf person ??? from ??? is invalid Rav Gidel said that Rav said ??? Rava said: even you say ??? here, ??? from the beginning here, ??? and after this ??? from the beginning so that thus it will be ??? thus ??? and after this ??? No. ??? of it ??? Abaye ??? from the beginning the daughter of chalitza She For it was taught in a mishna: two ??? one ??? and one A deaf person ??? to have two ??? One ??? and one ??? did he die A deaf person the master of ??? Just as may he do it? ??? the master of ??? one who has married and if running to discharge the mitzvah Let him bring forth did he die ??? the master of ??? Just as may he do it? A deaf person the master of ??? one who has married and does not sent forth In reality lit: In the world Is this not ??? from the beginning And we have learned one who has married yes.

דף קי,ב גמרא

??? No. No. ??? and after this ??? Come and hear: two ??? two ??? One ??? and one ??? did he die ??? the master of ??? Just as may he do it? ??? the master of ??? one who has married and if he wishes to discharge the mitzvah Let him bring forth did he die ??? the master of ??? Just as may he do it? ??? the master of ??? or ??? or ??? Is this not ??? from the beginning She also ??? from the beginning And we have learned one who has married yes. ??? No. something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has ??? two ??? one ??? and one A deaf person ??? two ??? One ??? and one ??? did he die A deaf person the master of ??? Just as may he do it? ??? the master of ??? It is because of this: ??? a woman did he die ??? the master of ??? Just as may he do it? A deaf person the master of ??? sent forth his wife ??? forbidden In reality lit: In the world And if you say So, here, ??? and after this ??? who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? Let him bring forth ??? No. Let him bring forth ??? he or ??? No. Let him bring forth ??? except Is this not ??? from the beginning ??? A deaf person from the beginning She also ??? from the beginning ??? from the beginning ??? also ??? from the beginning and we have learnt in a Mishna: regarding ??? one who has married yes. ??? No. He was silent. When he came before of Rav Yosef He said to him What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? to you ??? from the beginning ??? and after this ??? except It was necessary to you ??? two ??? two ??? or two ??? or two ??? One ??? and one ??? and thus two ??? for two ??? or for two ??? or for two ??? one ??? and one A deaf person Behold! these ??? from ??? and from ??? and if they were ??? and if ??? to discharge the mitzvah ??? How so? Shall I say ??? and in the end ??? who ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? No. Let him bring forth ??? he or ??? No. Let him bring forth ??? except Is this not ??? from the beginning ??? from the beginning we do not have also ??? from the beginning And we have learned if they were ??? yes. ??? No. ??? of Rabbah ??? a small one ??? Rav Nachman said ??? according to Rav Adda bar Ahavah, and for Rav, ??? in the marketplace ??? They said: this one For it was taught in a baraita a small one ??? yes. ??? One from them ??? What case is he dealing with? ??? for him ??? that is not ??? If it was ??? it's settled. for him If it was ??? it's settled. for him If it was ??? it's settled. for him That it comes ??? If it was ??? it's settled. ??? She the daughter of ??? She but: "She has fallen ??? A deaf person certainly ??? it's settled. for him ??? She the daughter of of him She I thought to say them I even "She has fallen for him ??? A deaf person also from doubt for him How so? ??? Rav Chisdah said Rav said one who has married ??? and a small one ??? until ??? Rav Chisdah said Learn from this his reasoning is Rav ??? a small one ??? It is not ??? For if it was ??? It is not ??? a small one ??? why is it that one who has married ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.