It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף קיג,א גמרא

??? and not ??? to it and what is the difference here, a small one ??? from terumah and what is the difference here, ??? that is not ??? from terumah For it was taught in a baraita ??? Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? on ??? and on a small one A daughter of Israel ??? from terumah And even ??? No. ??? lest ??? A deaf person ??? a child he eats ??? he ??? lest ??? A deaf person ??? A deaf person ??? also ??? from terumah is a law established by the Rabbis ??? Perhaps will come ??? from terumah a law established by the Torah and what is the difference here, a small one for there is to it her ketuba and what is the difference here, ??? to it her ketuba for if so, ??? and not ??? to it and a small one From where do we derive this? for there is to it her ketuba For it was taught in a baraita ??? Watch out for leading vav And they do not have her ketuba but: ??? and a small one there are to it her ketuba ??? From where do we derive this? ??? to it her ketuba as it is taught: A deaf person and a mute ??? despite the fact ??? they do not have upon them anything ??? there are to them her ketuba ??? or a mute Even if the writing of to it hundred a maneh worth one hundred dinars her ketubah written contract standing because of ??? The reason is ??? this one No. running It does not have for if so, ??? and not ??? to it If so, ??? to it her ketuba for if so, ??? and not ??? -- more ??? a woman ??? This certain individual A deaf person ??? of Rav ??? "and the writing of to it four hundred ??? Rabba said: one ??? Rabbah he his reasoning is Watch out for leading vav !! And even running a maidservant ??? who No. ??? for him how much more so Here in this case, That there are both Rav said Chiyya son of ??? Shmuel said ??? A deaf person yes. we are guilty on its account a guilt-offering suspended Let me say in support of him of R' Gidal: five No. ??? and if ??? yes. ??? terumah and they are A deaf person a mute and a child ??? that is not are his some texts say: and a worshipper of stars some texts say: and a gentile ??? of Israel even ??? Israel yes. its terumah terumah he for he said: like Rabbi ??? as it is taught: R' Isaac says It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer terumah of A deaf person No. ??? because it was doubt whether If it was ??? like Rabbi ??? a guilt-offering suspended also ??? in the case of ??? cuts and who he is required Rabbi Eliezer ??? cuts For it was taught: Rabbi Eliezer says ??? they are obligated on ??? a guilt-offering suspended Shmuel reasoned ??? upon it ??? and there are that they said Rav said Chiyya son of ??? Shmuel said ??? A deaf person we are guilty on its account a guilt-offering suspended They challenged him from this teaching: five No. ??? derive it like Rabbi ??? Rav Ashi asked What is the reason מאי טעמא For R' ??? This is obvious! ??? he ??? from doubt ??? If it was ???

דף קיג,ב גמרא

If it was Is this not ??? And really one ??? he or, perhaps, This is obvious to him. ??? Is this not ??? he and here in this other case, we were The reason is immediately ??? a mute for what practical distinction to discharge the mitzvah his wife ??? If you say, one ??? he ??? thus in the same way ??? And if you say ??? a mute ??? make kiddush. ??? he did not find ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? R' Yitzchak said So says the Torah. a mute ??? something ??? the master of ??? and What is the reason? And they said It is not ??? that did not have ??? of it ??? How so? Shall I say ??? to watch ??? to watch herself who ??? of it ??? except ??? to watch No. ??? and not herself So says the Torah. a mute ??? for this statement that of the academy of said poses a contradiction: Rabbi ??? (Deut. 24) and gave ??? who in which there is to it a hand ??? herself Came forth -- this refers to that it does not have a hand ??? herself and It was taught in the academy of Rabbi Yishmael, (Deut. 24) ??? from his house who ??? It is not ??? Came forth -- this refers to ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? to watch ??? It is not ??? to watch herself So says the Torah. a mute ??? for it is the case that ??? to watch ??? and say rabbis No. ??? that did not have ??? of it ??? Abayye said: ??? also where he teaches regarding ??? No. Let him bring forth and regarding that are his No. Let him bring forth ??? Why is it different here, where he teaches ??? and why is it different there, that is not The tanna teaches: ??? except Learn from this this one a law established by the Torah this one ??? that R' Yochanan said son of ??? They posed this difficulty: Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? a man This is obvious to him. and the woman ??? for him or, perhaps, a woman This is obvious to him. a man ??? for him Come and hear: ??? for him he does not ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? or in the case that one is not ??? "and the man he does not sent forth except ??? Learn from this a man ??? for him ??? Even -- this refers to ??? of it Learn from this a woman ??? for him except R' Yochanan son of ??? to their words he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them To me so that thus it will be ??? he did not find ??? a woman also No. ??? except ??? what is the difference here, a woman and what is the difference here, a man And they said to him he does not ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? Rabba said: ??? of Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? he said ??? saw writ this that I he gives and he said to it ??? a legal document obligation this Behold! This is ??? who did not say Rabbi Yochanan son of ??? No. in the case of ??? Here in this case, also, No. in the case of ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? a legal document obligation this ??? Come and learn from this. If it was ??? it was. he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them ??? he said ??? No. ??? and not something and that one for he says thus ??? he for he says them Rav Isaac son of ??? for him ??? of the house of study in a public domain on the Sabbath he came in front of Rabbi ??? He said to him: ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.