It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כב,א גמרא

??? both which are equivalent to each other ??? He accounts for them Hey, isn't it the case that ??? Hey, isn't it the case that from all a place To me ??? to us ??? He said to him: ??? If it was it was. it is written ??? who ??? upon them ??? the son of ??? who ??? upon them now also As it is written ??? Is this not Master, the son of ??? upon them It was taught by of the academy of Rabbi Chiyya the third ??? his wife ??? his wife the second ??? the second He said to him Ravina to Rav Ashi what is the difference here, is more ??? to it ??? and what is the difference here, to the bottom that is not ??? to it ??? is more ??? his wife ??? will come He accounts for to it to the bottom ??? Is this not ??? his wife ??? No. ??? to it Hey, isn't it the case that son of his wife the daughter of his wife ??? his wife ??? and not He accounts for to it ??? three ??? to the bottom that are his and not ??? a Tanna taught: also three ??? to the bottom ??? and not ??? Rav Ashi said to him for Rav, ??? of the academy of Rabbi Chiyya there is regarding them ??? or they do not have ??? Come and hear: for he said: Rav four women there are to them ??? And naught else Perhaps and thus he comes to say Rav ??? Come and hear: the third ??? the third ??? yes. ??? No. Perhaps ??? He said to him: Raba for Rav, ??? Look, Master, This from the rabbis who has arrived from the West and he said They asked in the west ??? or No. ??? He said to him: now for just as ??? If it was Is this not that they will not say have come ??? is stricter to "Kedushah", lightweight No. ??? in them? rabbis ??? Rav Nachman said is destiny? ??? Because and they came ??? Let him say in them? a saying ??? from ??? No. ??? and if ??? giving witness ??? from ??? acting as witnesses initially Ameimar he said even ??? from ??? also acting as witnesses initially and What is the difference ??? for all ??? giving witness to the court ??? he is equivalent.

דף כב,א משנה

who in which there is to him ??? from all a place ??? ??? he in every matter. except ??? in which there is to him ??? from the female slave and from some texts read: a worshipper of stars some texts read: a female gentile lit., stranger who in which there is to him son of from all a place exempts ??? his father from ??? he is liable on ??? and on ??? his son in every matter. except ??? in which there is to him son of from the female slave and from some texts read: a worshipper of stars some texts read: a female gentile lit., stranger

דף כב,א גמרא

from all a place it uses these particular words to include what? Rav Yehudah said to include a mamzer This is obvious! ??? he What would you have said? ??? the brother the brother ??? Ya'akov Just as there are proper and not ??? Even here, are proper and not ??? Come and learn from this. and so go ahead and say Here, too, immediately ??? he has become exempt

דף כב,ב גמרא

??? also ??? he for all ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? to him This is obvious! ??? he For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because and then it is written (Lev. 21) but instead ??? and Mar said: ??? -- this refers to his wife and then it is written (Lev. 21) No. ??? the master of ??? there are the master of ??? and there are the master of that do not become tamei How so? become tamei he ??? is valid And there is no meaning to the word become tamei ??? is invalid So, here, become tamei he ??? is valid And there is no meaning to the word become tamei ??? is invalid, Come and learn from this. and so go ahead and say So, here, there i.e., in another mishna To exclude ??? Here in this case, ??? except ??? in which there is to him ??? from the female slave and from some texts read: a worshipper of stars ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Scripture states: (Ex. 21) the his wife ??? who in which there is to him son of In any case, exempts ??? from all a place it uses these particular words to include what? Rav Yehudah said ??? a mamzer What is the reason? For scripture said: (Deut. 25) son of he (??? ) does not have he is liable on ??? why is it that Read here (Ex. 22) ??? No. ??? It once happened Your nation Like that which was said by Rav ??? in the name of Rav ??? a response Here in this case, also, ??? a response and that one son of a response he For it was taught in a mishna: Shimon son of ??? says Who is (Ecc. 1) ??? it is not possible to repair this that comes on ??? from it a mamzer now from this makes It once happened Your nation ??? The rabbis taught: that comes on ??? but it the daughter of ??? his father he is liable It is because of this: ??? but on account of the daughter of ??? his father Rabbi Yosei son of Yehudah says he is not liable except It is because of this: ??? only. and not because of the daughter of ??? his father What is the reasoning is a law established by the Rabbis They said: ??? it is written (Lev. 18) ??? the daughter of your father or the daughter of ??? the daughter of ??? your father ??? your father ??? She why do I have Learn from this ??? It is because of this: ??? but on account of the daughter of ??? his father and Rabbi Yosei, ??? Yehudah Scripture states: ??? She It is because of this: ??? you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: the daughter of ??? his father And the rabbbis This ??? She What then does it mean when it says my slave for him ??? them ??? on ??? the daughter of his father the daughter of of its mother to say that do not ??? from justice. and Rabbi Yosei, ??? Yehudah If so, let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? She why do I have It is because of this: ??? you ??? and if you ??? It is because of this: the daughter of ??? his father And the rabbbis Even though it will be As it is written ??? It is necessary to teach this ??? She that did not have shall you say in reality ??? from justice. And if you would say ??? the Merciful One why do I have the validity That it comes ??? "and the writing of to it he read Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: She and Rabbi Yosei, ??? Yehudah If so, ??? the Merciful One ??? She ??? he read and R' Yosi ??? Yehudah This the daughter of ??? your father What then does it mean when it says does he act? for him should bring himself who in which there is to him ??? of it creates an exclusion ??? that do not ??? of it and so go ahead and say creates an exclusion ??? this particular No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? of Raba pointed out a contradiction. it is written (Lev. 18) ??? the daughter of ??? or the daughter of ??? No. ??? this one the daughter of he built ??? the daughter of ??? Sarai and then it is written (Lev. 18) ??? a woman ??? No. ??? the daughter of he built and the daughter of ??? How so? here, ??? here, ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.