It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כד,א גמרא

there i.e., in another mishna If it was ??? there are ??? there are ??? and if ??? is forbidden to nullify the commandments ??? is forbidden to nullify the commandments ??? Here in this case, Each and every one ??? that are his ??? We do not bring out ??? It was taught by ??? And even if both priests What is the reason מאי טעמא Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah is a law established by the Rabbis She doubt whether Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah No. ??? in them? rabbis or a chalutzah is a law established by the Rabbis She For it was taught: (Lev. 21) a divorcee yes. for me except a divorcee Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah from where do we learn Scripture states: and the woman According to Rabbinic law, he and he read ??? in reality he

דף כד,א משנה

a commandment ??? and if Watch out for leading vav !! ??? ??? took possession

דף כד,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Deut. 25) and it was the case that the first-born ??? (Deut. 25) who ??? creates an exclusion ??? that do not she will give birth ??? because of lit. on the reputation of ??? You say ??? Or perhaps, except for the sake of lit. in the name of Joseph read that specific Joseph Yochanan read that specific Yochanan it is said here, ??? because of lit. on the reputation of ??? and it is said there (Gen. 48) because of lit. on the reputation of ??? Just as in that place is said there ??? Even in that place is said here, ??? and not ??? was his name creates an exclusion ??? Rabba said: even though ??? the Torah All of it yes. the written Torah he would exit something ??? Here in this case, ??? the value of ??? and if Is this not ??? the value of then I might incorrectly say: in that place in that place actually and really for one ??? the Merciful One ??? because of lit. on the reputation of your brother should bring himself If it was my heart judgement ??? because of lit. on the reputation of my brother his father should bring himself and Perhaps thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: them the Merciful One to the court And they said to him ??? because of lit. on the reputation of ??? except ??? the value of ??? now that you said he read ??? it is written I would say first-born ??? No. ??? If so, ??? that did not have he was in His world ??? the Merciful One why do I have ??? Rav Acha and so go ahead and say ??? This certain individual No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? in the inheritance ??? the Merciful One ??? from ??? and not from ??? and so go ahead and say For that it is possible first-born ??? the commandments ??? For there is not in this case. first-born No. ??? the commandments ??? Scripture states: did he die one from them Are we are not dealing ??? first-born and the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? a child and so go ahead and say ??? a child and the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? first-born this one ??? the Merciful One ??? that did not have he was in His world and so go ahead and say For there is not in this case. first-born Watch out for leading vav !! ??? a child took possession and if that it is possible first-born Watch out for leading vav !! ??? a child No. took possession Scripture states: (Deut. 25) For ??? this to this and so go ahead and say For that it is possible first-born ??? For there is not in this case. first-born yes. ??? next to The greatness Why is it that It was taught by Abaye ??? a commandment ??? No. running ??? next to ??? No. running ??? next to The greatness ??? Just as first-born his birthright ??? to him Even The greatness ??? to him and so go ahead and say For ??? first-born ??? For ??? No. ??? Scripture states: ??? because of lit. on the reputation of ??? Consider this case: he stood So rather, first-born ??? the Merciful One

דף כד,ב גמרא

for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? Just as first-born he does not take ??? Even This he does not take ???

דף כד,ב משנה

??? on the female slave ??? or on some texts read: a worshipper of stars some texts read: a female gentile lit., stranger ??? Behold! this No. ??? and if ??? We do not bring out ??? on ??? a man ??? despite the fact ??? Let him bring forth

דף כד,ב גמרא

this one female convert from this ??? We challenge that from the following baraita one a man ??? a woman and one a woman ??? a man and thus who ??? the table kings ??? my slave Solomon are not is destiny? ??? these are the words of R' ??? that he was Rabbi ??? says one ??? lions and one ??? and one ??? are not is destiny? ??? until ??? in these times (nowadays) in these times (nowadays) ??? except I would say ??? this one it was said: He ascended R' Yitzchak said son of Shmuel son of ??? in the name of Rav The halacha is in accordance with the words of One who says all of them is destiny? ??? are these If so, in the case where he did it initially, also, It is because of this: of Rav ??? for he said: Rav ??? (Prov. 4) ??? from you ??? "Here is ??? etc. The Rabbis taught yes. ??? is destiny? ??? in the days of the Messiah one like it; No. ??? is destiny? ??? No. in the days of David and not in the days of Solomon Thus said Rabbi Eliezer What then does it mean when it says he read (Is. 54) there are. ??? who ??? upon you ??? but: Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? on ??? a man ??? Rav said ??? Rav Sheshet said I thought to say For ??? Rav said: for this that he brought as it is taught: ??? on ??? a man ??? on ??? the hands of after if ??? No. Let him bring forth How so? How should we understand this? If it was That there are witnesses For he came after ??? What then does it mean when it says you shall except Is this not ??? witnesses and the reason who has arrived after ??? this one Is this not thus ??? Rav would say to you it is the law ??? that is not he came after ??? If it was that it is possible witnesses ??? If it was there is not in this case. witnesses No. ??? and thus he comes to say ??? who has arrived after ??? initially No. ??? They challenged him from this teaching: In what matters are we saying this? ??? to it children" but: there are to it children" No. ??? and if ??? even there are to it how much children" ??? Rav ??? to it ??? to it children" and there are to it witnesses And what does it mean when it says ??? of Rav ??? to it children" and there are to it witnesses and the reason That there are witnesses ??? and if there is not in this case. witnesses No. ??? to it children" even though ??? witnesses Rabba said: Our mishna ??? What is the purpose of teaching: ??? Let the Tanna teach: he took it out except all ??? in the house of judgement a court ??? he ??? And if you like, I could say Behold! ??? Rabbi She as it is taught: ??? he would exit and the woman ??? he said Rabbi Because ??? is more from ??? he said Rabbi Because ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.