It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לא,א גמרא

immediately that he came ??? chalitza ??? in reality he ??? also Let the Tanna teach: ??? chalitza ??? in reality he if You say ??? Here in this case, also, if You say ??? And there is no objection at all. ??? Abaye stillborn lit., fallen the house upon it and on the daughter of ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? whichever from them did he die ??? and not ??? why is it that Here in this case, also, Let him say a woman -- this refers to of a presumption that permission ??? is standing ??? you came ??? to ??? And if you say So, here, ??? to suffer lit, to the hands of ??? he ??? You say ??? in them? rabbis a ruin that is not ??? No. ??? in them? rabbis So, too, ??? that he came ??? to it chalitza They said: ??? of him. rabbis ??? he and they came ??? a ruin who ??? in them? rabbis ??? and regarding ??? who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: For it was taught in a mishna: it was is standing in the public domain ??? to it ??? to it ??? to him It is not ??? half and half ??? It is not ??? say for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion For if it was he is a priest forbidden for him and if ??? She ??? chalitza and we do not say ??? You say ??? this one it was said: He ascended Rabbah and Rav Yosef; that they said ??? Here in this case, ??? witnesses is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) One she says ??? to it and one she says ??? to him that he has i.e., that he is expected doubt a law established by the Torah Our mishna ??? One ??? doubt is a law established by the Rabbis And from where do you derive ??? One is equivalent ??? Just as ??? One Even ??? One ??? From where can you derive ??? One Perhaps ??? witnesses If it was ??? witnesses ??? And there is no objection at all. they stand witnesses ??? to it and is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? And there is no objection at all. And, too, ??? witnesses also doubt is a law established by the Rabbis She ??? two ??? two and the woman ??? something ??? a thing ??? a thing ??? they came among two They said: ??? and they came among two And they said ??? a mute ??? and Rav Ashi said ??? two ??? two

דף לא,ב גמרא

and the land ??? of a presumption that son of ??? except Abayye said: (Job 36) ??? upon it ??? a Tanna taught: ??? a Tanna taught: ??? Raba said to him If it was ??? upon it ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? where he teaches except Rabba said: all in which there is ??? there are ??? and there are ??? Just as that do not ??? This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ except It is because of this: ??? a Tanna taught: also ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? time ??? And on account of what No. ??? time ??? This is satistfactory ??? It is because of this: ??? to it ??? except ??? It is because of this: the daughter of ??? time It is because of this: That there are ??? and there are ??? No. ??? rabbis time He said to him Rav Acha the son of of Rav Yosef to Rav Ashi Hey, isn't it the case that ??? That there are ??? and there are ??? rabbis time there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, ??? Watch out for leading vav And if you wish, I could say It is because of this: where it is not possible in what way does ??? regarding ??? for him ??? regarding that are his There were times when ??? She ??? He ascended ??? regarding witnesses If it was ??? and if No. There were times when ??? and they came ??? and the Merciful One he said ??? and not ??? If so, ??? also Let him say thus there i.e., in another mishna ??? Here in this case, ???

דף לא,ב משנה

three ??? three ??? did he die one from them One who acts of it the second ??? did he die Behold! these ??? and not ??? as it is said (Deut. 25) did he die one from them ??? upon it ??? one and not ??? two ??? Rabbi Shimon says: ??? to the second

דף לא,ב גמרא

and if ??? two ??? a law established by the Torah chalitza also No. ??? except According to Rabbinic law, ??? lest they shall say two ??? from the house of one ??? lest they shall say the house of one partially ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.