It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לג,א גמרא

about what do they disagree? ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi Rabbi Chiyya reasoned Rabbi Yosei ??? both bar-Kappara reasoned No. ??? except one And what does it mean when it says prohibits ??? that it is possible Here in this case, This is satisfactory ??? from the beginning Sarai ??? is forbidden ??? We come to compare to it Sabbath ??? that he came ??? also ??? the master of ??? from the beginning Sarai in cases regarding eating is forbidden ??? for him ??? that he came ??? in cases regarding eating ??? also ??? except ??? "At the same time," She ??? to it ??? No. It concerns itself except what they disagree about ??? "At the same time," and who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi Rabbi Chiyya reasoned Rabbi Yosei ??? the daughter of One ??? both and bar-Kappara reasoned No. ??? except one and here in this other case, What then does it mean when it says prohibits the daughter of One that it is possible Here in this case, ??? on Shabbat For example, ??? two ??? on Shabbat ??? them ??? Sabbath together the master of ??? also For example, ??? two ??? for him ??? for him the master of ??? together ??? its spur lit., its finger ??? that is tamei This is satisfactory to Rabbi Chiyya For ??? for him who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi For ??? for there to be wheat ??? According to R' Shimon except for there to be wheat ??? R' Chiyya ??? except what they disagree about ??? the daughter of One and According to R' Shimon This is satisfactory to R' Chiyya ??? To exclude to R' Shimon ??? except for there to be wheat ??? what is the purpose according to him ??? it is a problem This is satisfactory for there to be wheat ??? For ??? Rabbi for him who follow the reasoning ??? For R' Shimon For ??? to Rabbi Chiyya who follow the reasoning ??? of R' Yosi except to Rabbi Chiyya bar-Kappara ??? He could say to you R' Chiyya For ??? Rabbi for him both ???

דף לג,ב גמרא

prohibits ??? and who follow the reasoning ??? For R' Shimon ??? for there to be wheat ??? who ate ??? to it Willow ??? of it and not ??? except "At the same time," reasoned ??? "At the same time," Here, too, "At the same time," ??? also ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? on Shabbat and the master of ??? there are here, It is because of this: ??? but on account of Sabbath but on account of the master of ??? but on account of ??? these are the words of Rabbi Yosei Rabbi Shimon says: yes. here, except It is because of this: ??? and the master of ??? only. And even ??? for one ??? Shall I say to Rabbi Yosei: now R' Yosi ??? two ??? the daughter of One ??? except Is this not to R' Shimon ??? he ??? but: ??? "At the same time," ??? a thing ??? on Shabbat in what way If it was ??? is valid and if ??? in reality he If it was ??? Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov ??? of the high priest in accordance with the words of One who says ??? of the high priest ??? is invalid If so, why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? even a priest ??? also ??? opposite him. he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: He disagreed with this Rav Ashi something sin-offerings The tanna teaches: or ??? The tanna teaches: except ??? in reality ??? He accounts for for what practical distinction ??? between the wicked ones ???

דף לג,ב משנה

two ??? two women or in the hour ??? of this to this and of this to this Behold! these they are obligated It is because of this: ??? a man and if they were ??? It is because of this: ??? and if they were ??? It is because of this: a woman to ??? and if they were ??? It is because of this: a menstruant and they separate those particular three months lest ??? there are. and if they were ??? those that are not ??? those particular immediately and if they were ??? from ???

דף לג,ב גמרא

??? something ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) And, too, this one for it teaches: Rabbi Chiyya Behold! here, ??? ten sin-offerings If it was with intent who that it is possible sacrifice Rav Yehudah said It was taught by ??? Here, too, ??? it is taught at the end if they were ??? those that are not ??? we make him repeat those particular immediately and if with intent who ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? a small one compulsion ??? and compulsion ??? Sarai Rather, that which was taught they separate those particular three months lest ??? there are. this one Is this not ??? and if with intent who Sarai except Is this not Learn from this ??? Learn from this

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.