It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לט,א גמרא

but his thought is Abaye ??? Raba said to him If it was ??? to it ??? beneath it ??? does not disagree ??? is preferable, ??? except This and this ??? to it ??? But the beginning of the teaching, that is not a slave of it ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? of it ??? but his thought is Raba ??? to the academy of Shammai makes certainly ??? doubt whether ??? certainly ??? doubt whether ??? it was said: in the name For R' ??? of Raba and it was said: in the name of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina ??? And who said it? Rabbi Eliezer thus for this statement that Rabbi Eliezer said poses a contradiction: ??? to the academy of Shammai It is not he acquires except ??? only. ??? And if you like, I could say In reality lit: In the world No. ??? He could say to you Rabbi Eliezer For They said: I that is not ??? to it ??? except who seeks also chalitza ??? that is not ??? who They said: Rav Pappa said: ??? and even though ??? where he teaches items of movable property ??? and they go out ??? What then does it mean when it says enters And what does it mean when it says ??? Is this not enters to domain ??? and they go out for the domain ??? to domain ??? and even though ??? and after death ??? And naught else ??? Behold! She ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion R' Yosi said son of ??? to say ??? This is obvious! For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because and then it is written (Deut. 25) ??? to him ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? upon it ??? yes. ??? No. Come and learn from this. ??? This is obvious! For it might have entered your mind that I would say: a commandment ??? the Merciful One upon it ??? now ??? upon it ??? Come and learn from this. and so go ahead and say Here, too, Scripture states: ??? to him ??? immediately ??? Behold! She ??? for all ??? but only that it should be her ketubah written contract ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא a woman ??? to him from the heavens and if ??? to it from ??? established to it ??? so that that lightweight should not be in His eyes ???

דף לט,א משנה

a commandment ??? No. running walking on all ??? No. ??? next to The greatness and say to him upon you a commandment or ??? or ??? in the case of a child. until ??? or ??? until ??? the sea or A deaf person or a mute yes. ??? to him except say to him upon you a commandment or ??? or ???

דף לט,א גמרא

it was said: ??? a child ??? The greatness They disagreed about this, R' Yochanan and R' Yehoshua son of Levi One says ??? a child is preferable, and one says ??? The greatness is preferable, The one who said ??? a child is preferable, for it is the case that a commandment ??? and the one who said ??? The greatness is preferable, in a place The greatness ??? a child This action is nothing at all. We have learnt in a Mishna: No. running we make him repeat on all ??? Is this not No. running ??? except ??? And we have learned walking next to ??? Learn from this ??? a child is preferable, No. No. running ??? and not ??? regarding ??? No. ??? No. ??? and not ??? why is it that ??? next to an adult male ??? immediately of a commandment upon it that are his ??? for him ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? in the case of a child. until ??? yes. ??? to him and if ??? a child is preferable, why is it that yes. ??? to him ??? Perhaps ??? until ??? the sea yes. ??? to him why is it that ??? Perhaps will come ??? except all ??? a commandment No. ???

דף לט,ב גמרא

??? that they said ??? the whole world does not disagree ??? a child is preferable, Because specifically, where they disagree is this: ??? a child So, too, here, it was said: ??? a child ??? The greatness They disagreed about this, R' Yochanan and R' Yehoshua son of Levi One says ??? The greatness is preferable, and one says For ??? The one who said ??? The greatness is preferable, for it is the case that a commandment ??? And the other one For say a commandment ??? in the matter of ??? but: in the matter of chalitza ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: No. ??? next to The greatness Is this not No. ??? except ??? And we have learned ??? next to The greatness so learn from this ??? The greatness is preferable, No. No. ??? No. ??? and not ??? regarding The greatness No. running No. ??? and not ??? except why is it that ??? next to The greatness ??? immediately of a commandment upon it that are his ??? for him ??? Come and hear: ??? until ??? the sea yes. ??? to him And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? The greatness is preferable, why is it that yes. ??? to him ??? Perhaps will come ??? in the case of a child. until ??? yes. ??? to him why is it that ??? Perhaps ??? also will come ??? except all ??? a commandment No. ??? It was taught there: the commandments ??? chalitza in the first, that were ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a commandment now that do not ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a commandment And they said the commandments chalitza ??? Rav said yes. ??? For they came in front of Rav He said to them If it was ??? If it was ??? the Merciful One (Deut. 25) and if No. ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man this one if valued him, and If it was he is required ??? If it was he is required ??? And even Rav Yehudah reasoned yes. ??? Rav Yehudah ??? the daughter of so-and-so ??? so-and-so ??? my heart judgement ??? and there are those who say If it was ??? and if No. ??? to it ??? to it ??? from by ??? my heart judgement on the land And Rabbi Chiyya son of ??? would conclude of it in the name of Rav Yehudah ??? Just as As it is written in the book ??? that Moshe ??? They disagreed about this, Rav Acha and Ravina One says ??? and one says even ??? even a woman And the halacha is according to the opinion ??? the validity in reality he and even ??? and even ??? in the first, that were ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a commandment the commandments ??? chalitza and now that do not ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a commandment And they said the commandments chalitza ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama R' Yitzchak said they returned to say the commandments ??? chalitza He said to him Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak ??? from the beginning reason that to it ??? the grave and in the end reason that to it ??? as it is taught: Abba Shaul says: the one who marries ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of an ornament ??? Another thing: it is as if ??? I in my eyes." to be ??? a mamzer But the sages say: (Deut. 25) ??? upon it from all a place Which Tanna taught: about this teaching For the Rabbis taught ??? upon it a commandment ??? it was upon it are in the general category permission ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: ??? upon it a commandment Which Tanna taught: Rabbi Yitzchak said son of ??? Abba the grave She This is what he means: ??? upon it a commandment ??? it was upon it are in the general category permission running for the sake of lit. in the name of an ornament he marries her. running ??? he marries her. ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: ??? upon it ??? Rava said: Even if you say rabbis and thus he comes to say ??? upon it a commandment ??? it was are in the general category permission running he marries her. running he does not he marries her. ??? It is possible ??? running he marries her. running he does not he marries her. running he does not he marries her. this one ??? of him. ??? Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough except I would say running he marries her. running ??? to it Scripture states: ??? upon it a commandment I would say But the beginning of the teaching, (Lev. 6) the commandments It may be eaten in a place ??? a commandment

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.