It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מ,א גמרא

??? it was upon it are in the general category permission ??? It is possible ??? Scripture states: the commandments It may be eaten in a place ??? a commandment This is satisfactory to Raba for he said: So, with whom does it agree? It is the rabbis' position Here in this case, thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: the commandments It may be eaten in a place ??? a commandment ??? it was upon it are in the general category permission running ??? running he does not ??? It is possible ??? running ??? running he does not ??? running he does not ??? For it is written (Ex. 29) and he ate ??? who ??? at them." This teaches ??? except running he ??? running a priest after ??? Scripture states: the commandments It may be eaten in a place ??? a commandment except for Rav, Isaac son of ??? for he said: Abba the grave She Here in this case, What then does it mean when it says two kinds of that it is possible And if you say running ??? running food that is large ??? food that is large who her name food For didn't Reish Lakish: say One who eats food that is large ??? is exempt fill ??? except running ??? running chametz ??? For it is written (Lev. 6) No. ??? chametz ??? and Raysh Lakish said and even ??? No. ??? chametz except running ??? running ??? This ??? How so? If it was ??? She this one ??? She and if No. ??? She the commandments the Merciful One in the Torah says No. In reality lit: In the world I would say to you ??? She ??? a Tanna taught: of him. he read ??? except ??? She ??? for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion to say ??? he would exit of it the hands of ??? on Passover despite the fact ??? from the beginning immediately ??? bread ??? of him. a person he would exit of it the hands of ??? on Passover

דף מ,א משנה

??? Behold! he ??? from ??? and if there are in that place ??? items of movable property of ??? the one who marries ??? took possession ??? of ??? R' Yehuda says: whether like this or whether like that if there are in that place ??? items of movable property of ???

דף מ,א גמרא

This is obvious! For it might have entered your mind that I would say: chalitza in a place ??? all of them ??? Come and learn from this. If so, Behold! he ??? from ??? he does not except ??? from ??? should bring himself except For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because ??? if there are in that place ??? As Mar said: ??? before for all ??? the one who marries ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא (Deut. 25) ??? because of lit. on the reputation of ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says Consider this case: ??? R' Yehuda says: ??? Ulla said "The halacha is like R' Yehudah and thus R' Yitzchak said ??? "The halacha is like R' Yehudah Ulla said (and there are those who say R' Isaac ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא with R' Yehudah As it is written (Deut. 25) and it was the case that the first-born who ??? Just as first-born he (??? ) does not have Even This also he (??? ) does not have If it was Just as first-born take the mouth of two after ??? Even This take the mouth of two after ??? something ??? because of lit. on the reputation of his father it is written ??? because of lit. on the reputation of ??? it is written and not on in that place his father I would say in a case ??? the commandments ??? in a case That there are ??? No. ??? the commandments ??? something ??? in the inheritance ??? the Merciful One ??? and if that it is possible ??? and if No. No. ??? R' Chaninah he read in front For R' ??? and he said "The halacha is like R' Yehudah He said to him ??? a seminal emission ??? That is not the halacha like R' Yehudah It was taught by a Tanna taught: in front of Rav ??? That is not the halacha like R' Yehudah He said to him except like who ??? This is obvious! an individual and many The halacha is ??? He said to him ??? He said to him not The halacha is ??? he ??? to you ??? and for what ??? then the ruling is acceptable. ???

דף מ,א משנה

??? he is forbidden ??? but it forbidden ???

דף מ,ב משנה

he is forbidden ??? cubits ??? he built ??? at a time i.e., in a case that it standing ??? are permitted but it forbidden ??? his father ??? his son ??? is permitted. a person ??? is forbidden ???

דף מ,ב גמרא

They posed this difficulty: ??? or No. ??? a law established by the Torah ??? in them? rabbis ??? No. ??? rabbis ??? or, perhaps, there is no difference Come and hear: he is forbidden ??? cubits And even if if cubits No. The tanna teaches: Perhaps we were The reason is that is not It was taught by It is because of this: ??? at the end of the teaching, ??? are permitted and if a Tanna taught: if if cubits ??? are permitted ??? if cubits but: ??? cubits ??? No. ??? if if cubits ??? ??? are permitted in all of them it is a problem Come and hear: She forbidden ??? his father The tanna teaches: from this ??? his father Is this not It is because of this: ??? to it ??? his son No. It is because of this: ??? to it ??? his son Come and hear: ??? his son Is this not It is because of this: ??? to it ??? his father No. It is because of this: ??? to it ??? my brother ??? his father this one Ameimar ??? my brother ??? his father Ameimar ??? to it ??? If so, we were ??? son of ??? a Tanna taught: ??? from ??? And we have learned ??? from ??? Come and hear: for it teaches: R' Chiyya four in words of Torah and four in words of ??? his son ??? son of ??? in words of Torah ??? his father ??? of its mother son of his son son of Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? The tanna teaches: from this ??? his father Is this not It is because of this: ??? to it ??? his son No. It is because of this: ??? to it ??? his son Come and hear: ??? of its mother Is this not It is because of this: ??? to it ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter No. It is because of this: ??? to it ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter Come and hear: son of his son Is this not It is because of this: ??? to it ??? his father No. It is because of this: ??? to it ??? my brother ??? his father Hey, isn't it the case that Ameimar considers it proper ??? my brother ??? his father Ameimar ??? to it It is because of this: ??? but his thought is ??? Come and hear: ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter Is this not It is because of this: ??? to it ??? of its mother No. It is because of this: ??? to it ??? my brother ??? of its mother Hey, isn't it the case that regarding ??? No. ??? except Is this not It is because of this: ??? And learn from this ??? "Hear!" ??? is permitted. a person ??? Rav said excessive ??? son of ??? Shmuel said that comes on ??? Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah ??? a mamzer What is the reason? ??? Rav Yosef said Even We also ??? is permitted. a person ??? If you say, This is satisfactory ??? It is because of this: thus is permitted. ??? except If you say, ??? is comparable why is it that is permitted. Let us say, ??? of Rabbi Yochanan for he said: between he between ??? yes. they are obligated Not on ??? he is spiritually cut off and not on ??? he is spiritually cut off He could say to you Rabbi Yochanan ??? Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah a law established by the Torah For didn't Reish Lakish: say here, year" Rabbi ??? a divorcee in words of Torah ??? Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah in words of ??? what is the difference here, This and what is the difference here, This

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.