It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מד,א משנה

it was One is valid and one is invalid if he was ??? and if he was ???

דף מד,א גמרא

four ??? except I would say four ??? freedom ??? for him For it was taught: (Deut. 25) and they read to him the elders of ??? there are. and not ??? and His word ??? This teaches ??? to him ??? to him ??? he was he ??? but it ??? he an elderly person but it she gave birth to ??? to him Just as to you next to she gave birth to Just as to you next to ??? next to ??? and do not ??? in your house" it is not necessary to teach this where it is possible for him ??? even ??? also ??? that is good Come and learn from this. four yes. ??? No. so that thus it will be ??? answer ??? whoever was ??? Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said Scripture states: (Deut. 25) who No. ??? the house of ??? the house of one he builds And there is no meaning to the word builds two houses ??? Mar Zutra said: son of ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 25) the house of ??? the house of one he ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? two houses ??? Scripture states: (Deut. 25) if No. ??? this one valued him, and ??? all The elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering ??? all that do not an elevation-offering ??? yes. an elevation-offering ??? And furthermore, that they will not say the house of partially ??? and partially ??? and they shall say If it was ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? Here, too, except ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? and he stood for him without ??? and so go ahead and say For that it is possible one ??? the commandments ??? For that it is possible both No. ??? the commandments ??? If so, ??? the Merciful One why do I have now two in reality is what you say? Do you really mean that? Is this not My son, chalitza ??? Why is it that No. It was necessary to provide both opinions For it might have entered your mind that I would say: ??? Come and learn from this. ??? except ??? it was One ??? Rav Yosef said here, year" Rabbi No. ??? a person who ??? and others are necessary to them

דף מד,א משנה

??? and One who married ??? and One who married ??? Let him bring forth ??? a mamzer these are the words of Rabbi Akiva but the sages say yes. ??? a mamzer "We thank..." ??? a mamzer

דף מד,א גמרא

reasoned R' ??? One who married ??? a mamzer For didn't ??? say here, year" Rabbi ??? a divorcee in words of Torah ??? Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah in words of ??? It was taught by ??? Here, too, ??? it is taught at the end "We thank..." ??? a mamzer If you say, This is satisfactory ??? of it we were where he teaches "We thank..." except If you say, No. ??? of it What then does it mean when it says "We thank..." and Perhaps It is to learn from this ??? a mamzer ??? this one The tanna teaches: to it ??? Who is a mamzer all the remainder of meat that he was without ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Rabbi Shimon ??? says all ??? upon it he is spiritually cut off ??? heaven and the halacha is ??? and Perhaps ??? to us a Tanna taught: like Rabbi Shimon ??? If so, Let the Tanna teach: the remainder of ??? why do I have except Learn from this ??? of it ??? In reality lit: In the world No. ??? of it ??? he turns ??? It was taught by also ??? except ??? to Rabbi ??? you shall a mamzer he said R' Chiyya bar Abba that R' Yochanan said we were The reason is ??? For scripture said: the house of ??? the scripture they read his house Rav Yosef said he said Rabbi Shimon ??? Everyone acknowledges ???

דף מד,ב גמרא

??? into the priesthood one Everyone acknowledges Shimon ??? for he said: Shimon ??? yes. a mamzer ??? shall not be ??? from this you shall From a "kal vachomer", ??? for just as a widow ??? that do not ??? the value of in all he built ??? -- this refers to ??? the value of in all is it not logical ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides She herself ??? And furthermore, She an abomination it is written And there is no meaning to the word ??? And furthermore, It was taught: ??? and One who married ??? and One who married ??? Rabbi Akiva says: he (of it) does not have ??? It is not it requires from him writ but it is invalid ??? is invalid, ??? that specific to discharge the mitzvah but the sages say he has of it ??? it requires from him writ but it is valid ??? is valid for one Is this not into the priesthood No. ??? If so, She is valid for one Shall I say ??? This is obvious! It is because of this: ??? except Is this not into the priesthood ??? into the priesthood ??? also into the priesthood something ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has Here, too, ??? where he teaches But the beginning of the teaching, She is invalid ??? is invalid, She is invalid for one Shall I say ??? It is because of this: ??? for him ??? except Is this not into the priesthood ??? is invalid, for one Shall I say into the priesthood this one ??? is valid Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't Rabbi Akiva say ??? a mamzer except This is obvious! ??? this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has at the end of the teaching, also this one like the rule that it has Hey, isn't it the case that like the rule that it has but it an abomination also She an abomination And there is no meaning to the word ??? an abomination but: ??? except a widow it is a problem Just as ??? which provides She herself ??? except If it was said, thus was it said; Rav Yosef said he said R' Shimon ??? Everyone acknowledges ??? on ??? one Everyone acknowledges Rabbi Yehoshua ??? for he said: R' Yehoshua yes. a mamzer ??? shall not be ??? from this you shall From a "kal vachomer", ??? for just as a widow ??? that do not ??? the value of in all he built ??? -- this refers to ??? the value of in all is it not logical ??? And if you would say Just as ??? which provides She herself ??? Here in this case, also, immediately ??? it was made ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said that R' Yochanan said Everyone acknowledges ??? some texts say: and a worshipper of stars some texts say: and a gentile that comes on A daughter of Israel ??? a mamzer one Everyone acknowledges Shimon ??? for he said: Shimon ??? yes. a mamzer ??? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.