It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נ,א גמרא

these two ??? took possession ??? to him No. took possession ??? to him these are the words of R' ??? But the sages say: took possession ??? to him No. took possession ??? to him They said to him: to Rabbi ??? Behold! he says ??? on your days." ??? ten year" He said to them: of his. ??? to him Know ye that the following proof is conclusively true: for behold! prophet ??? (I Kings 13) there are son of nolad ??? David ??? was his name ??? No. nolad ??? And the rabbbis Is it written ??? David it is written If it was ??? nolad If it was ??? his wife ??? and etc. ??? Rav Yosef said here, year" Rabbi ??? that is not it requires

דף נ,א משנה

Rabban Gamliel says: yes. writ after writ and not ??? after ??? and not ??? after ??? and not chalitza after chalitza But the sages say: there are writ after writ and there are ??? after ??? but not after ??? and not after chalitza anything How so? One who acts ??? and gave to it writ it requires from him chalitza One who acts ??? and chalitza it requires from him writ One who acts ??? and the master of Behold! This is ??? he gave writ One who acts ??? it requires writ and chalitza he gave writ and the master of it requires writ and chalitza he gave writ ??? yes. after chalitza anything ??? One who acts ??? he gave writ and the master of or the master of One who acts ??? he gave writ ??? yes. after chalitza anything

דף נ,ב משנה

One ??? One ??? one and one two ??? one How so? One who acts ??? require two ??? and chalitza ??? and writ ??? it requires writ and chalitza ??? and the master of -- this refers to require two ??? and chalitza ??? it requires writ writ ??? and writ ??? require from him chalitza writ ??? and the master of -- this refers to it requires writ and chalitza writ ??? it requires writ and chalitza writ ??? yes. after chalitza anything ??? or ??? One who acts ??? he gave writ and the master of or the master of and the master of or the master of One who acts ??? he gave writ ??? yes. after chalitza anything between ??? one to have two ??? between two ??? One ??? One who acts ??? he gave writ and the master of or the master of One who acts ??? and gave writ ??? yes. after chalitza anything between at the beginning between in the midst of between in the rear of ??? at a time i.e., in a case that it at the beginning there was not, after it, anything in the midst of and in the rear of there was, after it, anything Rabbi ??? says One ??? and one chalitza between at the beginning between in the midst of between in the rear of there was not, after it, anything at all.

דף נ,ב גמרא

Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? after writ ??? after ??? but: writ one ??? one ??? from those What is the reason מאי טעמא say rabbis writ ??? from those It is because of this: ??? in reality For if it was is what you say? Do you really mean that? Watch out for leading vav And ??? not They said: writ ??? and chalitza ??? Watch out for leading vav And ??? not chalitza also Watch out for leading vav And ??? not and comes ??? after chalitza What is the reason? say rabbis ??? from those It is because of this: ??? in reality For if it was is what you say? Do you really mean that? Watch out for leading vav And ??? not They said: ??? Watch out for leading vav And ??? not ??? also does not take effect and comes ??? after ??? and What is the reason מאי טעמא say rabbis ??? is invalid there was, after it, anything They said: If it was ??? after ??? She ??? after ??? It is because of this: ??? after chalitza and if ??? after ??? She ??? after ??? It is because of this: ??? after ??? and What is the reason מאי טעמא say rabbis This chalitza is invalid there was not, after it, anything They said: What then does it mean when it says ??? chalitza after ??? It is because of this: chalitza after chalitza all For Behold! ??? chalitza after ??? It is because of this: chalitza after ??? because chalitza after ??? who No. ??? writ ??? chalitza after ??? also ??? writ ??? Rabba said:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.