It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נא,א גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? for him writ If it was ??? If it was No. ??? If it was ??? If it was No. ??? writ If it was ??? If it was No. ??? If it was that came first ??? that was last What then does it mean when it says ??? If it was that came first No. ??? that was last also No. ??? If it was ??? If it was No. ??? If it was that came first ??? that was last What then does it mean when it says ??? and if that came first No. ??? that was last also No. ??? Abaye give thanks Rabban Gamliel in which there is writ after ??? after ??? and writ after ??? after ??? and writ and if from doubt for him to Rabban Gamliel ??? for it is the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? at a time i.e., in a case that it at the beginning there was not, after it, anything except Abayye said: In reality lit: In the world This is obvious to him. to Rabban Gamliel ??? say rabbis this one ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. trapping of from those of it writ it is dealing with a case where there is only one. trapping of from those of it ??? writ after writ No. ??? for it is the case that ??? for him that came first ??? after ??? No. ??? for it is the case that ??? for him that came first writ after ??? after ??? This the validity ??? and that one the validity ??? And the rabbbis Each and every one established for him rabbis writ ??? and that one ??? is invalid is preferable, ??? is preferable, ??? For this ??? after ??? Watch out for leading vav And ??? not And even ??? after ??? from those ??? For this ??? after ??? And even ??? after ??? No. ??? for him ??? The Rabbis taught How so? ??? yes. writ after writ two ??? before ??? one and gave writ ??? and writ ??? Rabban Gamliel says ??? is forbidden ??? and it is permitted ??? the second But the sages say: he gave writ ??? and writ ??? is forbidden ??? and chalitza ??? from them and thus You say with two ??? One How so? he said Rabban Gamliel yes. ??? after ??? two ??? before ??? one One who acts ??? Rabban Gamliel says: he gives writ ??? to it is forbidden ??? and it is permitted ??? the second But the sages say: he gives writ ??? is forbidden ??? and chalitza ??? from them and thus You say with two ??? One Mar said: he gives writ ??? and writ ??? Rabban Gamliel says ??? is forbidden ??? and it is permitted ??? the second Let us say, ??? of Shmuel for Shmuel said: ??? No. ??? He could say to you Shmuel For They said: I who follow the reasoning ??? ??? for he said: there are ??? and Rabban Gamliel reasoned yes. ??? reasoned yes. ???

דף נא,ב גמרא

rabbis reason that there are ??? And we have learned at the end of the teaching, and thus You say with two ??? One Let us say, ??? of Rabbah son of Rav Huna Rav said for he said: Rabbah the son of Rav Huna Rav said chalitza is invalid it requires ??? on all ??? He could say to you Rabbah the son of Rav Huna between to Rabban Gamliel between According to the sages, reason that yes. ??? and here in this other case, ??? after writ ??? after ??? what they disagree about Mar said: One who acts ??? Rabban Gamliel says: he gives writ ??? to it is forbidden ??? and it is permitted ??? the second ??? his reasoning is Rabban Gamliel yes. ??? after ??? the first also ??? Perhaps will come ??? to the second Rabbi Yochanan said: Rabban Gamliel and the academy of Shammai and Rabbi Shimon ben Azzai And Rabbi ??? all of them they both reason this way ??? he acquires ??? complete. Rabban Gamliel this one of which we were speaking? the academy of Shammai For it was taught in a baraita three ??? two from them ??? to have two ??? and one ??? did he die one ??? One who acts of it ??? and after this did he die ??? the second the academy of Shammai say his wife with it ??? It is because of this: ??? a woman Rabbi Shimon as it is taught: He said to them Rabbi Shimon to the sages if ??? two It is not ??? if ??? It is not ??? two also It is not ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? son of nine ??? rabbis and he said R' Shimon It is not ??? ben Azzai as it is taught: ben Azzai says there are ??? after ??? with two ??? One And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? one R' ??? For it was taught in a baraita R' ??? says One ??? and one chalitza between at the beginning between in the midst of between in the rear of there was not, after it, anything Hey, isn't it the case that ??? is invalid ??? rabbis And we have learned there was not, after it, ??? How so? One who acts ??? etc.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.