It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נד,א גמרא

sleeping No. he bought ??? except ??? for this statement that Rabbah said poses a contradiction: stillborn lit., fallen from ??? he is liable ??? items ??? No. he bought except For example, ??? came upon it both forced against our will of the academy of Rabbi Chiyya How so? For example, ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles ??? this to that came upon it From where do we derive this? For the Rabbis taught (Deut. 25) ??? upon it a commandment Another thing: ??? upon it between in error between with intent between ??? between ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? (Deut. 25) ??? No. ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? this one valued him, and ??? And so he came he read between in error between with intent between ??? between ??? Another teaching ??? upon it ??? that did not have ??? of it And there is no meaning to the word silver and a legal document They complete of it ??? the master of ??? Another explanation: ??? upon it between in error etc. Hey, isn't it the case that ??? This certain individual (Deut. 25) ??? his brothers? in that place ??? in a place ??? in that place And so he came he read between in error between with intent between ??? between ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav Yehudah said sleeping No. he bought ??? For scripture said: ??? upon it until ??? to it for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? For it was taught: between ??? sleeping I would say between ??? between that is old For it was taught: between ??? he between he sleeps between ??? She between that is old She Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? How so? How should we understand this? sleeping Rav Ashi said ??? and not ??? and not ??? For example, ??? for him and Responded and not know ??? reason out the logic. And so ??? for him ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rabbah said stillborn lit., fallen from ??? he is liable ??? items ??? No. he bought ??? on Shabbat ??? but: ??? No. ??? As Mar said: He is not liable on ??? until ??? Rabba said: ??? in a wall ??? No. he bought ??? he bought for it is the case that ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? one ??? Ulla said from where do we learn ??? from the Torah as it is said (Lev. 20) a man who ??? a woman ??? ??? ??? from here ??? from the Torah ??? a menstruant the remainder of ??? from where do we learn And if you would say let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? Just as ??? which provides imparts tumah ??? except We come to compare ??? As it is written (Lev. 20) a man who ??? ??? a menstruant She And so ??? a menstruant She except like a menstruant Just as a menstruant ??? Even ??? Just as ??? which provides in his hand ??? So if he wished, make kiddush. and it comes For a thousand except We come to compare ??? if As it is written (Lev. 20) ??? your father No. ??? for ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? if which provides prohibits that comes upon it. ??? No. We come to compare ??? ??? if Just as ??? which provides are forbidden It is because of this: the remainder of except ??? if Just as ??? which provides prohibits that comes upon it. except ??? produce that may or may not have been properly tithed ??? He disagreed with this Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? Just as ??? which provides they do not have permission ??? shall you say ??? a man which provides there are to it permission ??? He said to him: Rav Acha ??? because a menstruant ??? he ??? to them permission but: after from here there are to them permission a menstruant

דף נד,ב גמרא

??? hangs the validity ??? hangs the Merciful One except ??? thus Just as ??? which provides yes. ??? shall you say ??? a man ??? except he said R' ??? (and there are those who say Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua Scripture states: (Lev. 18) For all who may he do it? from all ??? all illicit relations all of them ??? Just as a menstruant ??? Even all ??? So rather, a menstruant ??? regarding ??? why do I have ??? For Rav Huna said: ??? from the Torah from where do we learn from where do we learn this one it is written ??? upon it except ??? from where do we learn This reason out the logic. She ??? the Merciful One after ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? forbidden and Perhaps after ??? a commandment ??? is a voluntary act So, too, after ??? yes. ??? No. Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts One who acts Scripture states: (Lev. 20) a man who ??? ??? a menstruant She And so ??? a menstruant She except like a menstruant Just as a menstruant even though in which there is to it permission after from here in the hour of ??? Even ??? even though in which there is to it permission after from here ??? except ??? regarding ??? if why do I have ??? of him Ravina ??? What then? ??? a woman ??? except ??? What then? He said to him: if he does not one topic ??? regarding ??? if That it comes ??? from that of Rabbi ??? one topic ??? livestock ??? a court She What is the reason? it is written ??? regarding ??? to write regarding ??? a court and let a conclusion be drawn by comparing ??? ??? a court בית דין ??? a court בית דין ??? he read ??? will come it is written of him. also this one the validity ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 18) ??? your father No. ??? between from ??? between from ??? You say between from ??? between from ??? Or perhaps, except from ??? and not from ??? It would be a logical inference he is liable here, he is liable ??? Just as ??? between from ??? between from ??? Even here, between from ??? between from ??? or ??? on the way -- this refers to he is liable here, he is liable ??? Just as ??? from ??? and not from ??? Even here, from ??? and not from ??? to whoever ??? prohibits that comes upon it. ??? that comes upon it. and do not ??? that do not prohibits that comes upon it. or ??? on the way this ??? and do not ??? himself Therefore, scripture states: ??? your father No. ??? between from ??? between from ??? No. ??? between from ??? between from ??? why do I have ??? why do I have ??? if he said Rabbi Abahu It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? which provides there are to it have pity but: ??? if I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? if which provides for there is but: ??? I would say it is not necessary to teach this ??? for him a Tanna their blood ??? and not from ??? for him Rabba said: We come to compare ??? It is written here (Lev. 20) ??? And it is written there (Lev. 25) or ??? or son of ??? Just as there from ??? and not from ??? Even here, from ??? and not from ??? and there in that case From where do we derive this? Scripture states: ??? if It is not ??? They said to him: ??? your wife and exalted. ??? and exalted. ??? and exalted. ??? and exalted. ??? is permitted. in the first, ??? is forbidden in the second ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? One from them ??? and if came on ??? after ??? is permitted. in the second ??? is forbidden ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.