It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נה,א גמרא

Perhaps, ??? his wife between from ??? between from ??? are forbidden From where do we derive this? he learns it ??? Just as ??? between from ??? between from ??? Even here, between from ??? between from ??? Just as ??? from ??? and not from ??? Even here, from ??? and not from ??? it was. for him ??? which provides ??? himself ??? himself ??? it was. for him ??? which provides a thing by way of lit., through the hands of ??? for upon the hands of ??? except ??? a thing by way of lit., through the hands of ??? himself ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 18) ??? your brother No. ??? between from ??? between from ??? You say between from ??? between from ??? Or perhaps, except from ??? and not from ??? It would be a logical inference he is liable here, he is liable ??? Just as ??? between from ??? between from ??? Even here, between from ??? between from ??? or ??? on the way -- this refers to he is liable here, he is liable ??? Just as ??? from ??? and not from ??? Even here, from ??? and not from ??? to whoever ??? himself ??? himself and do not ??? or ??? on the way -- this refers to ??? a thing for upon the hands of ??? for upon the hands of ??? and do not ??? that comes upon it. Scripture states: ??? your brother She between from ??? between from ??? and so go ahead and say This and this ??? from ??? one ??? to it children" ??? and one ??? to it children" ??? It does not have children" ??? and so go ahead and say This and this ??? from ??? one ??? to it children" ??? and one ??? to it children" after ??? there are to it children" after ??? it is not necessary to teach this he read ??? the Merciful One that it does not have children" it is permitted. this one there are to it children" forbidden and Perhaps It does not have children" forbidden ??? there are to it children" ??? So, too, It does not have children" a commandment there are to it children" is a voluntary act So, too, It does not have children" yes. there are to it children" No. Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts One who acts the writing of he read other than this (Lev. 20) ??? and so go ahead and say ??? from ??? from ??? Just as ??? from ??? after ??? Even ??? from ??? after ??? Scripture states: She ??? shall be ??? of it he is spiritually cut off why do I have ??? Yochanan for he said: R' Yochanan ??? all of them ??? One he is liable on all One and one and to Rebbi Isaac for he said: all ??? are in the general category they were and for what reason Came forth he is spiritually cut off ??? and not ??? From where do we derive this? ??? for him (Lev. 18) ??? a woman ??? on all a woman and the woman ??? of it the Merciful One ??? Why do I need ??? of Rabbah pointed out a contradiction. it is written (Lev. 20) ??? and then it is written (Lev. 20) ??? it shall be left to die of natural causes How so? he has children" ??? he (children") does not have walks ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? it shall be left to die of natural causes For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? until ??? but: ??? it is not written: the Merciful One ??? it shall be left to die of natural causes and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? it shall be left to die of natural causes ??? but: from the beginning No. ??? From where do we derive this? ??? the Merciful One (Lev. 19) emitting seed regarding a maidservant betrothed from this general principle it would follow ??? the Merciful One ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? Rav Ashi said If so, ??? he read ??? betrothed ??? From where do we derive this? We come to compare (Lev. 20) ??? (Lev. 21) ??? One who acts From where do we derive this?

דף נה,ב גמרא

We come to compare ??? From where do we derive this? If it was for one for he said: Is this not Is this not If it was for one for he said: One who acts One who acts except ??? From where do we derive this? We come to compare ??? a woman for her husband. From where do we derive this? We come to compare by a gezerah shava on the word "kicha" Rabba said: why do I have ??? the Merciful One emitting seed ??? betrothed emitting seed ??? a man emitting seed ??? betrothed ??? a man creates an exclusion ??? did he die This is satistfactory for one for he said: ??? did he die ??? is exempt except ??? he is liable What is there to say? except creates an exclusion ??? after death also ??? I would say ??? He ascended ??? a man Come and learn from this. ??? why do I have to account for that which was taught emitting seed creates an exclusion to a different matter What then does it mean when it says Another thing: Rav Sheshet said creates an exclusion ??? to it that did not have ??? Raba said to him ??? a woman it is written except Rabba said: creates an exclusion ??? to it a way Abraham He said to him Abaye ??? the Merciful One except Abayye said: creates an exclusion ??? to it ??? This is satistfactory ??? -- this refers to ??? except ??? -- this refers to is the kiss. What is there to say? But rather, in reality lit: in the world, ??? to it a way Abraham and It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: ??? the Merciful One And then it happened that ??? Come and learn from this. Shmuel said ??? -- this refers to is the kiss. is from that which is belonging to to a person ??? its spur lit., its finger on his mouth it would be impossible that did not have ??? For he came Rabbah son of son of ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? betrothed -- this refers to ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Sheishet emitting seed he is not liable except on ??? Is this not ??? No. ??? When Rav Dimi came that R' Yochanan said ??? -- this refers to ??? And they said to him Hey, isn't it the case that Rabbah son of son of ??? did not say Thus said them or ??? or I ??? For he came ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? -- this refers to ??? son of son of ??? certainly ??? Who would say ??? No. ??? and until ??? a seminal emission to it For he came Rav Shmuel bar Yehudah that R' Yochanan said ??? -- this refers to ??? actually and really

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.