It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נו,א גמרא

from here and onwards he does not except is the kiss. but exempt him upon it ??? one ??? and one ??? What then does it mean when it says he bought Rav said: he bought for all And Shmuel said No. he bought except ??? from ??? from ??? for it is the case that ??? from the beginning Because specifically, where they disagree is this: from the betrothal Rav said: ??? for it is the case that Rabbi the Merciful One ??? And Shmuel said For Rabbi the Merciful One ??? in a place the master of ??? No. And Shmuel is consistent in his reason for he said: Rav ??? Shmuel said all ??? one may feed ??? one may feed and all that do not ??? one may feed ??? he does not one may feed They challenged him from this teaching: A daughter of Israel ??? and not ??? until ??? It is not ??? did he die "She has fallen before ??? A deaf person ??? proper The strength ??? This is satisfactory for Rav, it's settled. except ??? it is a problem He could say to you Shmuel I would say thus and not ??? until ??? It is not ??? from terumah ??? and after this ??? did he die "She has fallen before ??? A deaf person ??? And what does it mean when it says ??? For this the master of A deaf person from the beginning No. ??? And even ??? A deaf person from the beginning ??? and there are that they said from the betrothal ??? No. ??? for it is the case that No. ??? the master of Because specifically, where they disagree is this: from ??? Rav said: ??? for it is the case that ??? from the beginning And Shmuel said It is not ??? For Rabbi the Merciful One ??? but: for all words No. For didn't Rav say ??? Shmuel said all ??? one may feed ??? one may feed I would say all ??? one may feed of it ??? one may feed of it and all ??? that do not ??? one may feed of it yes. ??? one may feed of it They challenged him from this teaching: A daughter of Israel ??? and not ??? until ??? It is not ??? did he die "She has fallen before ??? A deaf person ??? proper The strength ??? the master of This is satisfactory for Rav, ??? from the beginning except ??? it is a problem ??? The Rabbis taught A daughter of Israel ??? and not ??? until ??? It is not ??? nolad to it son of ??? did he die ??? Rabbi Natan says ??? But the sages say: It is not ??? What is the reason? of Rabbi he gave Rabbah said Because immediately ??? He said to him Abaye Except I can object with text from here: A daughter of Israel ??? for him ??? immediately ??? except immediately ??? for him ??? for him ??? Here in this case, also, immediately ??? for him ??? except Rav Yosef said his reasoning is R' he gave ??? A deaf person ??? from terumah and not ??? A deaf person because ??? A deaf person He said to him Abaye If so, nolad to it son of why do I have It is because of this: rabbis ??? Rabbi Natan upon them ??? the sages, until ??? and then, separately, i.e., in addition to Moses pitching the tent, we had ??? upon them If so, Let the Tanna teach: did he die ??? It is not ??? Rabbi Natan says ??? and thus that comes on One from all ??? Rav said ??? this one a saying he said to us Rav Sheishet

דף נו,ב גמרא

??? Israel ??? despite the fact ??? for her husband. is invalid into the priesthood and it was taught ??? and thus that comes on One from all illicit relations that are said in the Torah or ??? What then does it mean when it says and thus Is this not there is no difference in error and there is no difference with intent and there is no difference ??? and there is no difference ??? And we have learned ??? No. What then does it mean when it says and thus ??? Shall I say ??? This comes to imply ??? ??? it is written Rather, what can we conclude? and thus ??? the essence ??? a woman ??? it is written Rather, what can we conclude? and thus ??? Rabba said: ??? a priest ??? upon it It is because of this: ??? It is because of this: ??? yes. It is because of this: ??? No. I would say Even It is because of this: ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rabbi Zeira (Num. 5) but it No. ??? forbidden this one ??? it is permitted. and there are to you ??? forbidden and if -- this refers to -- this refers to ??? a priest Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts One who acts Rabbah said The entirety they were are in the general category ??? to you the scripture regarding ??? Israel but it No. ??? forbidden this one ??? it is permitted. from this general principle it would follow ??? a priest ??? and there are that they said Rabbah said ??? a priest ??? upon it It is because of this: ??? It is because of this: ??? yes. It is because of this: ??? No. Perhaps, ??? No. ??? of him. ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rabbi Zeira but it No. ??? forbidden this one ??? it is permitted. and there are to you ??? by the mouth of ??? forbidden and What is -- this refers to ??? a priest Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts One who acts Rabba said: The entirety they were are in the general category (Deut. 24) "After who ??? to you the scripture regarding ??? Israel but it No. ??? forbidden this one ??? it is permitted. from this general principle it would follow ??? a priest ???

דף נו,ב משנה

a widow ??? The greatness a divorcee or a chalutzah ??? from the betrothal No. ??? from terumah Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Shimon validate it ??? or ??? from ??? from the betrothal ???

דף נו,ב גמרא

It was taught: he said ??? is a kal vachomer for just as ??? is a voluntary act yes. ??? transgression not all the more so? They said to him: No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? is a voluntary act which provides he (??? ) does not have in a place after shall you say ??? transgression which provides he has ??? in a place after R' Elazar said R' Osha'ya said ??? a priest ??? A daughter of Israel we came ??? and Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Shimon According to Rabbi Meir, for he said: ??? is invalid a law established by the Torah No. ??? Here, too, No. ??? for R' Eliezer and R' Shimon that they said ??? is invalid a law established by the Torah ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.