It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נח,א גמרא

to Rabbi Meir for he said: ??? also ??? for R' Eliezer and R' Shimon that they said ??? No. ??? also No. ??? And from where do you derive Perhaps Up to this point, he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: ??? there i.e., in another mishna except ??? to it but: ??? that is not he bought to it No. ??? Up to this point, No. ??? Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Shimon there i.e., in another mishna except ??? that is not ??? but: ??? Here, too, ??? except If it was that it is possible to say ??? as it is taught: ??? -- this refers to -- this refers to ??? or who enter ??? and not ??? they eat of his. and they eat from terumah they would enter from this general principle it would follow ??? actually and really except Is this not For example, who enter ??? and not ??? And we have learned they eat of his. and they eat from terumah Rabbi Yishmael his son of R' Yochanan son of ??? says all ??? and all that do not ??? yes. ??? From where can you derive Perhaps Rabbi Yishmael his son of Rabbi Yochanan ben Berokah ??? he reasons for himself. for he said: ??? No. ??? This all that do not ??? yes. ??? all that do not ??? yes. ??? should bring himself Perhaps ??? for he said: Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna ??? he said ??? also ??? Rav said ??? this one the validity he said to us Rav Sheishet ??? there are ??? and it was taught ??? "Amen" that did not have ??? This ??? How so? Shall I say ??? to it ??? to it ??? the daughter of ??? She Hey, isn't it the case that We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? No. ??? and not ??? her ketuba except ??? to it ??? to it ??? who ??? to it ??? For it was taught: (Num. 5) ??? Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? they examine his wife yes. Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? yes. ??? they examine his wife except ??? to it ??? and not ??? And learn from this there are ??? Rabba said: ??? for it is the case that ??? She Hey, isn't it the case that For he came Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Acha bar Chanina ??? he came and he carried it ??? in his hands (Num. 5) ??? who ??? the master of ??? and not ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama It concerns itself For example, upon it came ??? in the house of ??? regarding ??? upon it came ??? in the house of ???

דף נח,ב גמרא

??? to it his wife ??? She For thus said Rav he bought for all ??? for he said: No. he bought except ??? something he The reason is except for Rav, this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Rav he bought for all Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, ??? of it ??? and the academy of Shammai She that they said ??? he acquires ??? complete. If so, we were ??? Is this not it is a single observance except ??? that are his ??? Here in this case, also, ??? that are his ??? Rav Papa said, This a Tanna taught: he as it is taught: yes. ??? to it ??? but: ??? it ??? Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak he said by way of lit., through the hands of ??? Rav ??? in the name of Rabbi Yochanan One who makes ??? to him ??? even he a priest but it ??? from ??? for one Shall I say to Rabbi Meir I will say for he said: Rabbi Meir ??? is invalid No. ??? according to Torah law, is a law established by the Rabbis Watch out for leading vav And who said it? So rather, to Rabbi ??? and Rabbi Shimon now ??? is invalid a law established by the Torah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis ??? except For he came ??? he said One who acts of it ??? the words of all are ??? he has ??? the words of all are It is not ??? No. ??? except ??? to it writ Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? he said It is not ??? Watch out for leading vav And Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? even to Rabbi Meir for he said: It is not ??? What case is he dealing with? ??? is invalid a law established by the Torah but: is a law established by the Rabbis ??? he said It is not ??? even ??? and Rabbi Shimon that they said ??? What case is he dealing with? ??? to him ??? in a place after But here, in this case, immediately ??? to him ??? in a place after No. And if you say Here in this case, also, he has ??? a division from of him ??? my heart exalted. but: this one ??? or ??? Rabbi brought this very question Chiyya son of Joseph ??? the high priest ??? a minor female ??? beneath it

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.