It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נט,א גמרא

What then? according to nisuin the sanctification of the marriage do we go? or according to betrothal do we go? He said to him ??? or ??? from ??? from the betrothal ??? He said to him: ??? No. ??? for me ??? She ??? For ??? for me (Lev. 21) This is only in the case a woman ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? in the case of or ??? in the case of He said to him: Here, too, ??? the widow ??? to be the high priest ??? It is different there in that case As it is written (Lev. 21) ??? a woman Here in this case, also, it is written a woman One and not two for just as you see this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that No. ???

דף נט,א משנה

the high priest No. ??? a widow between a widow from the betrothal between a widow from the nisuin the sanctification of the marriage and not ??? ??? R' Elazar and R' Shimon validate it ??? ???

דף נט,א גמרא

The rabbis taught: (Lev. 21) a widow No. ??? between a widow from the betrothal between a widow from the nisuin the sanctification of the marriage This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? a widow a widow ??? Just as there from the nisuin the sanctification of the marriage Even here, from the nisuin the sanctification of the marriage Come and learn from this. and so go ahead and say Here, too, is equivalent ??? Just as a divorcee between from the nisuin the sanctification of the marriage between from the betrothal Even a widow between from the betrothal between from ??? and not ??? ??? The rabbis taught: This is only in the case a woman ??? creates an exclusion ??? to it ??? These are the words of R' Meir R' Elazar and R' Shimon validate it ??? in what way ??? Rabbi Meir reasoned a virgin even a small portion of virginity ??? until That there are all ??? yes. that did not have ??? No. and Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Shimon reason that a virgin a virgin ??? And even if a small portion of virginity ??? until ??? all ??? between ??? between that did not have ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said ??? that did not have ??? is invalid into the priesthood He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba (Deut. 22) to him ??? to him creates an exclusion ??? The greatness a divorcee or a chalutzah ??? How so? ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of It is because of this: a widow Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him It is because of this: ??? to it the case is that of an elevation-offering, except Is this not that did not have ??? but on account of a widow yes. It is because of this: the case is that of an elevation-offering, No.

דף נט,ב גמרא

So, with whom does it agree? R' Meir She Rav for he said: ??? If it was like Rabbi ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of It is because of this: the case is that of an elevation-offering, Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough for him ??? to it ??? for it is the case that R' Elazar said ??? that comes on ??? that did not have for the sake of lit. in the name of ??? it was made ??? Rav Yosef said For example, ??? to a domesticated animal for in that place It is because of this: the case is that of an elevation-offering, that it is possible It is because of this: ??? there is not in this case. Abaye said to him: ??? your soul If it's about an elevation-offering, ??? also ??? and if ??? did not occur the case is that of an elevation-offering, also did not occur And if you say something ??? wood that did not have ??? If so, yes. to you a woman ??? into the priesthood that did not have she was made a woman who was injured by a stick by way of lit., through the hands of ??? except Rabbi Zeira said ??? Rav said ??? son of Chiyya ??? to a domesticated animal is valid into the priesthood Another teaching is like this: ??? to whoever that is not a man despite the fact ??? is valid into the priesthood When Rav Dimi came he said It once happened ??? One ??? the house ??? Rabbi into the priesthood Shmuel said ??? The greatness in the days of Rabbi the high priest who it was. except ??? The greatness Raba said to him ??? to Rav Ashi ??? this one the validity ??? rabbis yes. ??? to a domesticated animal As it is written (Deut. 23) Do not bring ??? and we have learnt in a Mishna: ??? are permitted ??? as it is said (Deut. 23) also both two and not four The Rabbis taught ??? himself ??? himself No. ??? and if exalted. ??? his fellow ??? his fellow No. ??? and if exalted. R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov says ??? But the sages say: ??? if exalted. ??? Rav Huna said Rav said and sends forth ??? and but how do you reconcile that with this teaching where he teaches if exalted. ??? Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov to say

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.