It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סח,א גמרא

for it is the case that ??? and if A daughter of Israel ??? She No. one may feed to it It is because of this: ??? If it was the daughter of a priest to Israel She ??? to it for it is the case that ??? is a law established by the Rabbis and if A daughter of Israel ??? She No. one may feed ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says and that one Is this not son of ??? son of nine two ??? nine and one day for what If it was ??? a child also ??? If it was ??? The greatness also No. one may feed Abayye said: Here in this case, ??? son of nine two and one day that comes on ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) ??? for him For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because and according to Torah law, ??? for him ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this. they make ??? son of ??? two and one day ??? Raba said to him If so, at the end of the teaching, where he teaches doubt whether son of ??? two and one day doubt whether that is not now certainly son of ??? No. one may feed doubt whether ??? except Rabba said: ??? nine two and one day ??? The tanna teaches: ??? and As it is taught: son of nine two and one day ??? a Cuthean ??? and a mamzer ??? on ??? Hey, isn't it the case that When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, if are not ??? in going ??? Behold! these ??? from this general principle it would follow that at the beginning of the teaching Is this not ??? is what we're dealing with (lit. what we're immersed in) But the beginning of the teaching, invalid as regarding ??? at the end of the teaching, invalid as regarding ??? Back to the main body of the text: son of ??? two and the day ??? a Cuthean ??? and a mamzer ??? on ??? Rabbi Yosei says: all ??? is invalid, invalidates it all that do not ??? is invalid, he does not invalidates it Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says all that you ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter you ??? and all that do not you ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter If it was you ??? From where do we derive this? Rav Yehudah said Rav said Scripture states: (Lev. 22) the daughter of a priest For ??? immediately ??? to it ??? This should bring himself for he says the Merciful One the daughter of a priest ??? No. ??? this particular (Lev. 22) ??? to the house of ??? It may be eaten ??? the Merciful One ??? to the house of ??? It may be eaten from this general principle it would follow originally No. ??? If it was ??? then I might incorrectly say: Is this not that comes from this general principle it would follow One who acts One who acts Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: This ??? (Lev. 22) ??? does not eat and that which was sanctified for Temple use ???

דף סח,ב גמרא

This certain individual should bring himself ??? two and all ??? are written ??? should bring himself ??? the son of Rabbi Chanina for thus said Rabbi ??? the son of Rabbi Chanina and all ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not ??? of R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina from ??? and all ??? should bring himself to account for that which was taught ??? It is not ??? and Rav Chisdah said Ravina said son of Rav ??? What then does it mean when it says he read As it is written (Lev. 22) the daughter of a priest For ??? She ??? It may not be eaten It may not be eaten ??? from ??? If so, to write he read She ??? It may not be eaten What then does it mean when it says ??? both ??? From where do we derive this? ??? Abba Rav said the daughter of the daughter of Here in this case, also, the daughter of the daughter of like who like Rabbi Akiva. who derives an explanation from ??? even you say rabbis completely the daughter of he read ??? he ??? into the priesthood From where do we derive this? because ??? No. into the priesthood ??? them For if it was ??? the daughters of ??? terumah ??? Why is it that No. It concerns itself ??? on account of he built on account of he built is a kal vachomer for just as ??? to it ??? that is not ??? except on account of he built not all the more so? but it ??? to it this one that is not made kiddush, ??? No. ??? to it except into the priesthood is a kal vachomer ??? for just as a divorcee ??? from terumah forbidden into the priesthood -- this refers to ??? from terumah is it not logical ??? into the priesthood And so ??? from justice. ??? the validity in reality he and so go ahead and say ??? to it ??? For ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says ??? for there is in them? ??? Is this not My son, ??? If so, some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and a slave No. ??? from that of Rabbi Yishmael for thus said Rabbi Yochanan It is because of this: Rabbi Yishmael from where do we learn some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? and a slave who has sex with A daughter of Israel and on ??? as it is said (Lev. 22) the daughter of a priest For ??? a widow and a divorcee etc.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.