It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף סט,א גמרא

who in which there is to him ??? of it they have fulfilled the mitzvah some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and a slave that do not to him ??? What is our source for this claim Like that which was said by R' Abba -- Rav said the daughter of the daughter of So, here, the daughter of the daughter of like who like Rabbi ??? who derives an explanation from ??? even you say rabbis All of it the daughter of he read ??? he and so go ahead and say who in which there is to him ??? of it For he does not have seed ??? For it has seed No. ??? Whoever does not have ??? of it even though is what he has seed also ??? If so, ??? why do I have and to Rebbi ??? for he said: yes. ??? And what does it mean when it says For ??? For ??? a widow and a divorcee why do I have a widow ??? upon it and a divorcee ??? upon it And it was necessary to have both statements For if it was we had heard a widow a widow he and so when ??? to it seed ??? It is because of this: ??? into the priesthood but: a divorcee that is not ??? into the priesthood I would say even though ??? to it seed No. ??? and if we had heard a divorcee a divorcee he and so when ??? to it seed No. ??? It is because of this: that is not ??? into the priesthood but: a widow ??? into the priesthood I would say even though for there is to it seed also ??? Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements and so go ahead and say ??? to it Even he turns ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says who ??? from the beginning To exclude This that is not ??? from the beginning he If so, ??? he from the beginning No. ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 21) No. ??? There is an analogy between ??? to him Just as he renders invalid Even ??? also invalidates it and so go ahead and say ??? is equivalent ??? The greatness ??? Just as the high priest ??? Even This also ??? and so go ahead and say until That there are ??? is equivalent ??? Just as the high priest ??? Even This also ??? and Rabbi Yosei says: all ??? is invalid, invalidates it and all that do not ??? is invalid, he does not invalidates it What is the difference between Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna to Rabbi Yosei: R' Yochanan said: ??? two ??? two There is this difference between them: and both of them, No. ??? except ??? The greatness ??? Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna reasoned Just as ??? and invalidates it Even This also invalidates it and Rabbi Yosei, reasoned ??? The greatness Just as the high priest ??? is invalid, and invalidates it Even all ??? is invalid, invalidates it To exclude ??? two ??? is invalid, As it is written (Deut. 23) children" who ??? to them ??? the third ??? to them in the congregation of ??? Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel says all that you ??? Watch out for leading vav or his daughter you ??? What is the difference between R' Yosi ??? Shimon son of ??? Ulla said ??? There is this difference between them: and both of them, No. ??? except ??? The greatness ??? Rabbi Yosei reasoned Just as the high priest ??? is invalid, and invalidates it Even all ??? is invalid, invalidates it Rabban Shimon ben Gamliel reasoned Just as the high priest ??? for all of ??? is invalid, and invalidates it Even for all of ??? is invalid, and invalidates it To exclude ??? all ??? is invalid, As Mar said: ??? and not ??? and not ???

דף סט,א משנה

??? No. invalidate it and not ??? and if are not ??? in going ??? Behold! these invalidate it How so? ??? Israel who has sex with the daughter of a priest It may be eaten from terumah

דף סט,ב משנה

??? It may not be eaten from terumah ??? who transgress ??? It may be eaten he was a priest who has sex with A daughter of Israel It may not be eaten from terumah ??? It may not be eaten she gave birth to It may be eaten Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found his strength of son of The greatness is from that which is belonging to ??? invalidates it It is because of this: ??? and does not invalidates it It is because of this: seed How so? A daughter of Israel ??? the daughter of a priest to Israel and she gave birth to from him son of he has walked ??? on the female slave and she gave birth to from him son of Behold! this a slave it was if his father A daughter of Israel ??? It may not be eaten from terumah the daughter of a priest to Israel It may be eaten from terumah a mamzer invalidates it and one may feed How so? A daughter of Israel ??? the daughter of a priest to Israel and she gave birth to from him the daughter of and the halacha is ??? to a slave or some texts say: to a worshipper of stars ??? and she gave birth to from him son of Behold! this a mamzer it was if of its mother A daughter of Israel ??? It may be eaten from terumah the daughter of a priest to Israel It may not be eaten from terumah the high priest occasions he renders invalid How so? the daughter of a priest to Israel and she gave birth to from him the daughter of and the halacha is ??? and she gave birth to from him son of behold! This is הרי זה ??? to be the high priest ??? atop the altar of one may feed of its mother and invalidates it if of its mother This one says No. ??? that he was ??? from ???

דף סט,ב גמרא

??? about this teaching ??? a mute and a child ??? women and they died? ??? from ??? and from ??? How so? he was Israel who has sex with the daughter of a priest It may be eaten from terumah ??? No. ??? immediately ??? It may not be eaten ??? lest ??? who No. We have learnt in a Mishna: they separate those particular three months lest ??? there are. Rabbah said son of Rav Huna ??? No. ??? No. ??? For it was taught: Behold! this ??? one hour before ??? forbidden to eat from terumah immediately except Rabbah said son of Rav Huna ??? No. ??? who ??? For it was taught: the daughter of a priest ??? to Israel did he die ??? from terumah ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? until forty For if it was No. ??? this one No. ??? and if ??? until forty ??? in reality She Abaye said to him: If so, I would say at the end of the teaching, ??? shall be ??? at the end of eating, before they leave What then does it mean when it says ??? until forty it was said: that comes on ??? in the house of ??? Rav said: ??? a mamzer And Shmuel said ??? Rabba said: ??? of Rav ??? but not ??? that was last that are his ??? for him Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it where he teaches she gave birth to It may be eaten How so? Shall I say ??? she gave birth to why is it that It may be eaten except Is this not of him ??? and not ??? for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? and to this ??? that was last that are his ??? for him Here in this case, ??? and to this ??? is it not all the more so? He said to him Abaye In reality lit: In the world I would say to you all in a case ??? of him even though that is not ??? Rav said ??? a mamzer What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? to join with the body of ??? that were both ??? in prison lit. the house of shackles that it is possible that they said ??? upon it ??? does not disagree ??? that are his ??? for him So, too, here, it was said: ??? Rav said: ??? a mamzer And Shmuel said ??? Rabba said: ??? of Rav that is not ??? of him ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.