It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ע,א גמרא

but: ??? from him even though ??? secondly, that are his ??? for him Rabba said: ??? I thought to say to it where he teaches she gave birth to It may be eaten How so? Shall I say ??? from him and not ??? it's necessary to say this. ??? except Is this not ??? also ??? for just as there i.e., in another mishna ??? and to this ??? secondly, that are his ??? for him Here in this case, ??? and to this ??? is it not all the more so? He said to him Abaye In reality lit: In the world I would say to you all in a case ??? even though ??? from him Rav said ??? a mamzer ??? that it was not the case that ??? invalidates it It is because of this: ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Scripture states: (Ex. 21) the his wife ??? a mamzer invalidates it ??? The Rabbis taught and seed It does not have yes. for me except ??? seed ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: and seed It does not have from all a place yes. for me except seed is valid seed is invalid, from where do we learn Scripture states: and seed It does not have ??? He ascended Hey, isn't it the case that ??? seed ??? No. It is necessary to teach this he read My son, children" Behold! there are. ??? For It is necessary to teach this he read ??? is invalid, He said to him Reish Lakish: to Rabbi Yochanan like who like Rabbi Akiva. for he said: there are a mamzer ??? even you say rabbis ??? and a slave ??? when Rav Dimi came R' Yitzchak said son of ??? It is because of this: our rabbi, some texts read: a worshiper of stars some texts read: a gentile and a slave that comes on A daughter of Israel ??? occasions ??? The Rabbis taught ??? son of houses ??? from terumah Really? ??? son of houses ??? from ???

דף ע,א משנה

??? and all ??? No. ??? from terumah ??? from terumah ??? there are. ??? No. ??? and if No. ??? Behold! these ??? and if ??? all ??? are his and even One from them ??? all ??? and if a remnant would remain ??? Even if ??? is value

דף ע,א גמרא

It was taught: R' Elazar said from where do we learn ??? that do not he eats from terumah it is said (Ex. 12) ??? on Passover and it is said (Lev. 22) ??? from terumah Just as ??? is said on Passover ??? is forbidden in it Even ??? is said from terumah ??? is forbidden in it Rabbi Akiva says: it is not necessary for him Behold! he says (Lev. 22) a man a man ??? Mar said: Rabbi Eliezer says it is said ??? on Passover and it is said ??? from terumah Just as ??? is said on Passover ??? is forbidden in it Even ??? is said from terumah ??? is forbidden in it ??? For if it was Is this not ??? that it is possible ??? Just as ??? which provides we are guilty on its account It is because of this: pigul, notar, and tamei ??? Which ??? If it was ??? It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. as it is taught: ??? this ??? the world ??? this ??? two and he said ??? and do not it is said ??? and as for me, says ??? the world he does not he eats ??? two is it not all the more so? Watch out for leading vav !! And even thus I was says ??? this ??? two but: ??? the world he eats came ??? on ??? by the mouth of ??? the world yes. he eats except ??? This ??? the Merciful One on Passover What then does it mean when it says ??? If you were to say ??? actually and really It is because of this: that he has i.e., that he is expected ??? for him ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? to us regarding terumah that is not ???

דף ע,ב גמרא

Perhaps, No. ??? for him ??? Here in this case, also, No. ??? for him ??? except ??? one he ??? for him for R' Eliezer for he said: ??? one ??? immediately ??? It is not necessary my field one ??? and my field one ??? and it was for him ??? the value of ??? If it was Just as Passover ??? is forbidden in it Even terumah ??? is forbidden of it R' Yosi said son of ??? Scripture states: ??? (Lev. 22) and all ??? Watch out for leading vav And I said to you and not ??? I would say and not ??? this one it is written (Lev. 22) ??? for just as you see ??? which provides ??? It once happened And it once happened ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? before ??? is essential ??? it was. for him ??? which provides that is old in all hour ??? women And there is no meaning to the word in his hand ??? himself ??? Rava said: without ??? also No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? As it is written ??? ??? we complete it If it was Just as Passover ??? is essential Even terumah ??? is essential Scripture states: (Ex. 12) ??? that specific Then shall eat in it ??? is essential in it ??? on Passover And there is no meaning to the word ??? is essential from terumah If so, I would say (Ex. 12) all ??? does not eat in it in it he does not he eats but: he eats he from terumah this one it is written ??? for just as you see ??? it was. for him ??? which provides It once happened ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? it was. for him ??? which provides that is old in all hour ??? And if you wish, I could say without ??? also No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? who that it is possible something ??? is not essential of him. ??? of him. now that you said in it ??? he who has arrived (Ex. 12) all son of ??? does not eat in it why do I have in it

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.