It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עב,א גמרא

And if you wish, I would say It is because of this: that is not ??? them wind of the north as it is taught: all those particular forty year" that were Israel in the wilderness No. ??? to them wind of the north What is the reason? If you wish, I would say It is because of this: ??? are they, And if you like, I could say that is not ??? Answer me honor Thus said Rabbi ??? Therefore, day ??? and day ??? No. ??? of him. and not ??? of him. ??? of it many (Ps. 116) ??? The Rabbis taught all those particular forty year" that were Israel in the wilderness No. he was day that did not have ??? in it wind of the north ??? the night. as it is said (Ex. 12) And it was ??? the night. And Hashem ??? all first-born etc. What then does it mean when it says ??? Thus can we come and learn from this. the understanding of favor the validity She Thus said Rabbi ??? So says the Torah. straight he eats from terumah ??? upon it because of ??? They challenged him from this teaching: straight It is necessary for him ??? According to Rabbinic law, ??? to it What then does it mean when it says ??? to it this one It is necessary for him The tanna teaches: ??? R' Yehuda says: No. ??? because of ??? She to him They said to him: Is it not the case that in great quantity ??? in the days of son of ??? children" and the daughters of as it is said (Gen. 17) ??? Even if hundred occasions And it is said: (Gen. 17) ??? ??? Why "And it is said"? I.e., why do I need both prooftexts? And if you say This ??? ??? Come and hear: ??? ??? he reasoned ??? He used the wording to it ??? he read a law established by the Torah She and not She According to Rabbinic law, and he read ??? in reality They challenged him from this teaching: ??? yes. he eats from terumah ??? they eat straight and nolad ??? Behold! these ??? he eats from terumah And there is no meaning to the word he eats ??? he does not he eats No. from terumah and not ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, straight and nolad ??? Behold! these they eat ??? For Rav Huna ??? Mar said: ??? he does not he eats from terumah ??? for him Shall I say ??? as it is taught: ??? I will say for he said: ??? who say doubt whether a woman he And there is no meaning to the word a woman ??? a woman Abayye said: ??? Rava said: What then does it mean when it says ??? of its mother of its mother This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? one may feed that do not ??? he does not one may feed Come and learn from this. Come and hear: ??? he does not he eats No. from terumah and not ??? This is satisfactory ??? a Tanna taught: But the beginning of the teaching, ??? certainly And we have learned at the end of the teaching, doubt whether ??? except to Raba ??? Why do I need What then does it mean when it says ??? now doubt whether ??? No. ??? certainly ??? What is the reason? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: What is the reason? ??? he does not he eats from terumah because of ??? he ??? he does not he eats No. from terumah and not ??? Let us say, ??? straight ??? and a child that which is in the past its time but the remainder of all ??? who in which there is to him two ??? are not ??? except by day Rabbi Eliezer ??? Shimon says ???

דף עב,ב גמרא

yes. ??? except by day that did not have ??? by day and by night Is this not In this case, what they disagree about ??? reasoned straight a law established by the Torah and one master reasons that straight is a law established by the Rabbis ??? a child that which is in the past its time who that it is possible ??? is a law established by the Rabbis except everyone agrees lit: according to the whole world straight is a law established by the Rabbis and a child that which is in the past its time a law established by the Torah and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? by day and one master reasons that No. ??? by day This is like ??? Rabbi Yochanan ??? notar ??? he does not ??? except by day that did not have ??? between by day between by night ??? Rabbi Eliezer to Rabbi Yochanan yes. for me except ??? that do not ??? except by day from where do we learn ??? that ten to one ten that two ten ??? Therefore, scripture states: by day and even for one that is not he expounds. ??? he expounds. He was silent. according to ??? He said to him Rabbi Yochanan ??? I saw ??? who was siting ??? He said to him Reish Lakish: that are his She ??? She in a case a Tanna taught: for him ??? priests ??? Rabbi Eliezer said ??? is valid something ??? day ??? that he is forbidden from terumah is valid ??? Just as for a tevul yom which provides is permitted. ??? because We as regard to eating, we say it. We ??? we say it. for just as A tevul yom that he is forbidden ??? is permitted. ??? when it is permitted ??? is it not logical when it is permitted ??? Another teaching is like this: ??? is valid And it once happened he was ??? the sages ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? is invalid, because it was doubt whether ??? is invalid, ??? is valid Rabbi Yehudah says Even ??? because of ??? a woman and the woman is invalid ??? The tanna teaches: from this ??? doubt whether ??? is invalid, ??? Rav Yosef said This a Tanna taught: a Tanna taught: of the academy of Rabbi Akiva he ??? for him ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Akiva says: (Lev. 22) a man a man ??? Rabba said: it was. ??? in front of Rav Yosef it is a problem for me No. ??? a Tanna taught: ??? ??? and let us say, R' ??? She and not Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: ??? are exempt from ??? there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: ??? as it is taught: The entirety are proper ??? except for a deaf-mute and a child Rabbi Yehudah considers it proper in the case of a child. and invalidates it ??? What is the reason? is a law established by the Rabbis As it is written (Num. 19) ??? ??? are proper ??? And Rabbi Yehudah He could say to you If so, let scripture say ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? for even in the case where ??? there i.e., in another mishna are proper Here in this case, If so, a woman also and gave and not it was given And the rabbbis If it was it is written ??? and gave then I might incorrectly say: ??? one and he will give one Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and were given ??? two ??? two Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: ??? and gave for even in the case where ??? two and he will give one

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.