It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עח,א גמרא

??? two in what way Watch out for leading vav "veyithar" Perhaps For if it was he crossed He used the wording For if it was No. it is written he read Behold! a mamzer For if it was ??? he read For if it was ??? the writing of For if it was ??? it is not written: Behold! he turns ??? For if it was ??? there i.e., in another mishna It is because of this: the essence ??? he ??? The Rabbis taught if it is said children" why is it said ??? and if it is said ??? why is it said children" if it is said children" It is not said ??? I was says son of ??? and a second person is forbidden the third is permitted. ??? it is said ??? and if it is said ??? It is not said children" I was says ??? those who are standing on a mountain ??? it is said children" to them from them a maneh worth one hundred dinars to them he has walked after ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? to them and It is necessary to teach this ??? who ??? For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: who ??? a maneh worth one hundred dinars Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: to them and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: to them ??? preganant ??? She he built one Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: who ??? and It is necessary to teach this ??? to them Here in this case, and It is necessary to teach this ??? to him regarding a mamzer For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: Here in this case, It is because of this: ??? is invalid but: a mamzer ??? is valid I would say No. and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: regarding a mamzer It is because of this: ??? in going in the congregation of In reality lit: In the world But here, in this case, I would say it is not necessary to teach this Rabbah bar bar Channah said that R' Yochanan said ??? two ??? the first he built the third ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is according to that are his ??? for him Rav Yosef challenged this by citing Rabbi ??? says it is possible for them ??? How so? a mamzer exalted. a maidservant ??? a slave ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found son of ??? Perhaps, according to ??? for him It is different there in that case For scripture said: (Ex. 21) the his wife ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rava said: R' Yehudah ??? he was for me ??? Rabbi Akiva and he said I ??? the first ??? to the children of ??? the second so that that it should be son of My son, ??? in going in the congregation of And if it enters your mind to argue that secondly, that are his ??? for him even the first also this statement that he said poses a contradiction: for him Rabbi Yochanan a Tanna It was taught by the first When Rav Dimi came Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? two ??? the first he built two ??? Perhaps, according to ??? for him Abaye said to him: but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: R' Yochanan ??? A sin-offering preganant and she gave birth to running ??? of it running ??? If you say, This is satisfactory transgresses Is this not ??? of its mother he it was. for him ??? two sin-offerings each of them as backups for the other And Rav says ??? two sin-offerings each of them as backups for the other ??? in one from them ??? it shall go to pasture except If you say, transgresses ??? of its mother he it was. for him The offspring of a sin-offering and The offspring of a sin-offering ??? Watch out for leading vav !! and it comes He was silent. He said to him Perhaps It is different there in that case As it is written who ??? the scripture ??? He said to him ??? between the pillars For Rabbi Yochanan said: about this teaching ??? The reason is As it is written who ??? this one in reality according to Avuah ??? for him but how do you reconcile that with this teaching for he said: Raba ??? preganant ??? he built it is not necessary immersion why is it that it is not necessary immersion And if you say It is because of this: of Rabbi Isaac for he said: Rabbi Isaac So says the Torah. the majority of his body ??? upon it separating the majority of his body that is not ??? upon it he does not separating

דף עח,ב גמרא

for this statement that Rav Kahana said poses a contradiction: They did not teach such a ruling except the majority of his body but: all of it separating that I transgresses ??? For he came Ravina that R' Yochanan said ??? he has walked after ??? he has walked after ??? he has walked after ??? As it is taught: from where do we learn to one from the nations. who has sex with ??? son of that you permission ??? as it is said (Lev. 25) also ??? for you from them ??? It is possible Even if one from who were Canaanites who has sex with One from the nations. ??? son of that you permission ??? Scripture states: who ??? from ??? and not from ??? he has walked after ??? in what way Shall I say ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? of it ??? and not ??? except ??? If it was male, you shall ??? according to ??? If it was female you shall ??? according to ???

דף עח,ב משנה

??? are forbidden and their prohibition prohibits the world one ??? and one ???

דף עח,ב גמרא

Raysh Lakish said ??? after ten ??? it is permitted. he learns it ??? Just as there ??? are permitted Even here, ??? are permitted If it was Just as there immediately Even here, immediately For ??? the value of ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? are forbidden and their prohibition prohibits the world one ??? and one ??? There is no difficulty. this one like who for he said: ??? this one like who for he said: ??? They asked Rabbi Eliezer ??? after ten ??? What then? He said to them: who He shall give" for me ??? the third ??? Perhaps, his reasoning is ??? No. life and thus Rav Huna said ??? No. life Hey, isn't it the case that We We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? are forbidden and their prohibition prohibits the world Rabbi Zeira said To me ??? for me of him of Rav Yehudah ??? life that is not ??? No. life ??? and not ??? until three ??? life ??? No. life This certain individual that there is ??? For R' Ami ??? upon it ??? it was. crying and it comes He said to him: life, I have given to you Rav said ??? son of ??? David ??? upon them as it is said (II Sam 21) and he reads the king ??? and he said ??? No. ??? Israel these etc. What is the reason? ??? upon them As it is written (II Sam 21) And it was famine in the days of David three years year" after year" year" the first He said to them: lest ??? by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry there are among you As it is written (Deut. 11) ??? God others ??? to them ??? the heavens and not it shall be rain etc. Examine and they did not find the second He said to them: lest those who were passing over transgression there are among you As it is written (Jer. 3) ??? No. he was ??? a woman ??? he was to you etc. Examine and they did not find the third He said to them: lest ??? justice among the many there are among you And there is no meaning to the word ??? As it is written (Prov. 25) ??? wind of ??? Watch out for leading vav And there was no man ??? that is false Examine and they did not find he said yes. ??? suspended except among immediately and He requests David the face of Hashem Who is it Raysh Lakish said ??? of the Urim and Tumim. What is to be heard to support this reading? R' Elazar said We come to compare the face of the face of It is written here and He requests David the face of Hashem And it is written there (Num. 27) and He asked to him in justice ??? before Hashem and he said Hashem to the grave and do not the house of ??? on who ??? to the grave that did not have ??? and do not the house of ??? on who ??? And so ??? except from the midst of ??? a city the priests. that were ??? to them water and meal ??? upon it the scripture it is as if ??? to the grave that did not have ??? on who ??? yes. for he said: ??? What then does it mean that it is written (Zeph. 2) they sought Hashem all ??? earth who ??? in that place ??? he said David the grave ??? them

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.