It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פא,א גמרא

Let us say, ??? of Rav Hamnunah. for he said: ??? is invalid ??? No. it is the law even after also ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, ??? and thus ??? to it ??? The reason is ??? this one No. ??? No. like who does not rule like Rabbi Yehudah For if it was Rabbi Yehudah Watch out for leading vav !! For didn't ??? say She

דף פא,א משנה

??? the sun a priest ??? A daughter of Israel ??? from terumah Rabbi Yosei and R' Shimon say ??? a priest ??? A daughter of Israel ??? from terumah R' Yehuda says: ??? and it is found male, No. ??? because it was ??? but not ??? R' Eliezer says: ??? we are guilty on its account stoning ???

דף פא,א גמרא

This is obvious! What would you have said? ??? one may feed that is not ??? he does not one may feed ??? Rabbi Yosei and Rabbi Shimon say ??? he said Reish Lakish: ??? from terumah And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rabbi Yochanan says Even ??? what is the difference here, ??? a law established by the Torah terumah also a law established by the Torah Here in this case, with what are we dealing? from terumah in these times (nowadays) is a law established by the Rabbis but: at a time i.e., in a case that the House of Holiness the Temple stood i.e., as long as he lived What then does it mean when it says No. ??? yes. ??? ??? ??? In what matters are we saying this? from terumah is a law established by the Rabbis but: from terumah a law established by the Torah No. Here, too, he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: ??? from terumah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis And there is no meaning to the word ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? and even from terumah is a law established by the Rabbis Perhaps will come ??? from terumah a law established by the Torah And R' Yochanan said: Even ??? He said to him R' Yochanan ??? Who deduces terumah ??? is a law established by the Rabbis He said to him yes. that I he learns Mishna ??? an elevation-offering He said to him: Is it not the case that I he learns Mishna ??? an elevation-offering Who deduces all ??? We learned: ??? We learned: Who is it For it was taught in a baraita who that were to him ??? of ??? the vineyard ??? with others

דף פא,ב גמרא

all of them ??? These are the words of R' Meir but the sages say they went up to on the first and two hundred that he was Rabbi Meir says: all ??? make kiddush. but the sages say he does not make kiddush. except Six items only. Rabbi Akiva says: seven These are ??? ??? and Rabbi Akiva ??? Even loaves of a householder ba'al habayit' ??? orlah produce of the first three years of a new tree ??? the vineyard ??? the vineyard R' Yochanan reasoned ??? We learned: ??? reasoned all ??? We learned: What then does it mean when it says ??? as it is taught: ??? of A sin-offering that is tamei ??? in a case where there are one hundred cuts of sin-offerings ??? and thus ??? of bread ??? that is tamei ??? in a case where there are one hundred ??? of bread ??? Rabbi Yehudah says No. ??? but: ??? of A sin-offering that is tahor ??? in a case where there are one hundred cuts of Those who are ill ??? and thus ??? of bread ??? that is tahor ??? in a case where there are one hundred ??? of Those who are ill ??? the words of all are No. ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, But the beginning of the teaching, ??? he said Rabbi Chiyya the son of For Rav Huna ??? If so, What is the reason? with R' Yehudah

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.