It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פה,א גמרא

Consider this case: ??? that do not the value of in all and the reason ??? the Merciful One My son, ??? and not the daughters of ??? this one Is this not thus ??? women ??? What is the reason? Is this not It is because of this: of Rav Yehudah Rav said No. ??? fill they took that it is possible that they said ??? for him ??? I thought to say ??? from tumah Come and hear from this. Rav ??? and Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua ??? of Rav Idi bar Avin They asked ??? or did not say them Rav ??? ten ??? if they put it up on the altar ??? priests ??? is destiny? ??? ??? priests ??? are permitted in going this to that ??? is destiny? ??? ??? are permitted in going this to that ??? in going this to that And even ??? No. The tanna teaches: He said to him Rav Huna the son of of Rav Joshua all in a case ??? from those and Behold! ??? from those The tanna teaches: a priest immediately For this he is required ??? for him No. The tanna teaches: they came in front of Rav Idi bar Avin He said to them ??? Thus said Rav Yehudah Rav said No. ??? in words of ??? They asked of him My son, ??? the second ??? and not the second ??? there are to it her ketuba ??? or No. immediately As Mar said: her ketubah written contract on ??? to it or, perhaps, immediately For this ??? to it ??? established to it rabbis ??? to it He said to them Rav Sheishet ??? her ketubah written contract on ??? and if it was the second ??? Even if ??? It does not have from this general principle it would follow That there are for there is to it ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: her ketubah written contract on ??? and if ??? to it ??? established to it ??? and if it was the second ??? Even if ??? yes. ??? Rabbi Eliezer brought this very question ??? Yochanan a widow ??? a divorcee or a chalutzah ??? there is regarding them food or Watch out for leading vav And they do not have food How so? Shall I say ??? he arises food ??? to it it is not necessary to teach this ??? he ??? the sea ??? What then does it mean when it says food; ??? her ketuba ??? to it her ketuba ??? to it food; or, perhaps, her ketuba ??? to it food; Perhaps ??? to it He said to him ??? to it For it was taught: there are to it For this teaching after death ??? for he said: He said to him: It was taught: there are to it this one ??? he arises So rather, Watch out for leading vav !! For it was taught: there are to it For this teaching after death The Rabbis taught a widow ??? The greatness a divorcee or a chalutzah ??? there are to it her ketuba fruits food ??? but it is invalid ??? is invalid, ??? that specific to discharge the mitzvah ??? in words of ??? It does not have her ketuba No. fruits No. food and not ??? but it ??? is valid ??? that specific to discharge the mitzvah he said Rabbi Shimon son of ??? On account of what did they say a widow ??? there are to it her ketuba because it was is invalid, but it is invalid ??? it is invalid. but it is invalid

דף פה,ב גמרא

??? that specific her ketuba And on account of what did they say ??? in words of ??? Watch out for leading vav And they do not have her ketuba because it was is valid but it is valid and in all places that he was is valid but it is valid ??? it her ketuba Rabbi says ??? these are the words of Torah these are the words of Torah It is not necessary for them ??? these are the words of ??? these are the words of ??? they all require ??? Another thing: ??? and this is ??? Another thing: one The tanna teaches: to it that it is possible for he said: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? The tanna teaches: to it and What is the reason? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: What is the reason? And they said he is invalid, but it is invalid ??? that specific her ketuba because it was ??? and What is the reason? he is valid but it is valid ??? it her ketuba because of that it ??? that it is possible for he said: Rabbi The tanna teaches: to it or a chalutzah ??? has a problem Hey, isn't it the case that Watch out for leading vav or a chalutzah is a law established by the Rabbis ??? to it her ketuba he returns he said immediately ??? to it According to Rabbinic law, ??? and this is ??? What is the difference between Rabbi to Rabbi Shimon son of ??? Rav Chisdah said ??? to Israel There is this difference between them: ??? a law established by the Torah Here, too, a law established by the Torah ??? because it was ??? this one She ??? for him and to Rebbi Eliezer for he said: Behold! this a slave and a mamzer this one No. ??? for him and not something except Rav Yosef said he turns a divorcee ??? There is this difference between them: The one who said a law established by the Torah Here, too, a law established by the Torah and the one who said because it was ??? this one She ??? for him and to Rebbi ??? for he said: there are a mamzer ??? this one No. ??? for him and not something except Rav Pappa said: the case is that of an elevation-offering, ??? There is this difference between them: The one who said a law established by the Torah Here, too, a law established by the Torah and the one who said because it was ??? this one She ??? for him to R' Eliezer son of Ya'akov for he said: there are ??? One who acts this one No. ??? for him and not something except Rav Ashi said he turns doubt whether ??? There is this difference between them: ??? a law established by the Torah Here, too, a law established by the Torah ??? because it was ??? this one She ??? for him to R' ??? son of A deaf person for he said: Even if he has walked ??? came upon it on the way it was made ??? this one No. ??? for him and not something except Mar said: son of Rav Ashi Sotah certainly There is this difference between them:

דף פה,ב משנה

A daughter of Israel ??? preganant ??? and thus the daughter of a priest to Israel It may not be eaten from terumah A daughter of Israel ??? preganant ??? and thus the daughter of Levi to Israel It may not be eaten ??? the daughter of Levi ??? preganant ??? and thus the daughter of a priest ??? It may not be eaten No. from terumah and not ???

דף פה,ב גמרא

and shall be ??? who No. ??? Rav Nachman said Shmuel said So, with whom does it agree? ??? She for he said: first tithe is forbidden ??? as it is taught:

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.