It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פו,א גמרא

terumah ??? and first tithe ??? these are the words of Rabbi Meir Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya ??? from this general principle it would follow That there are one ??? except I would say ??? Even ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא For R' ??? Rav Acha said the son of of Rabbah in the name ??? (in Numbers 18) for tithe the Children of Israel who ??? to Hashem terumah Just as terumah forbidden ??? Even first tithe is forbidden ??? If it was Just as terumah we are guilty on its account death plus a fifth Even tithe we are guilty on its account death plus a fifth Scripture states: (Lev. 22) and they died? in it For ??? upon it in it and not ??? upon it and not on tithe And the rabbbis Just as terumah ??? Even first tithe also ??? and As it is taught: Rabbi Yosei says: It is possible No. ??? he is liable except on he immersed that did not have ??? from him all the essence ??? from him terumah that is large and not ??? from him first tithe first tithe and not second tithe And even if tithe Responded from where do we learn Scripture states: (Deut. 12) No. ??? to eat ??? and elsewhere in the scripture he says (Deut. 26) and he ate ??? Just as ??? is said there tithe Responded Even ??? is said here, tithe Responded and the Merciful One in the Torah says No. ??? and if from there then I might incorrectly say: ??? but: death No. Come and learn from this. ??? other than this first tithe ??? from that of Rabbi ??? If it was ??? but: death No. Come and learn from this. in what way have you established that it is ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, the daughter of Levi ??? the daughter of a priest ??? It may not be eaten No. from terumah and not ??? Here in this case, What then does it mean when it says ??? that it is possible Rav Sheshet said What then does it mean when it says It is not ??? where he teaches It is not ??? is a voluntary act ??? from this general principle it would follow ??? is a voluntary act yes. For it was taught: (in Numbers 18) ??? that specific in any place "You ??? on ??? A daughter of Israel ??? is a voluntary act ??? You say is a voluntary act ??? Or perhaps, except to eat is what you say? Do you really mean that? terumah is stricter ??? tithe ??? is it not all the more so? except ??? on ??? A daughter of Israel ??? is a voluntary act ??? Mar, the son of Rabbana, said to say that do not they divide to it tithe in the house of ??? This is satistfactory for one for he said: It is because of this: ??? except for one for he said: It is because of this: a divorcee a divorcee the daughter of ??? who No. ??? a divorcee the daughter of a priest who No. ??? a priest who No. ??? from terumah ??? a divorcee the daughter of Levi who No. ??? except ??? It is because of this: a divorcee A daughter of Israel If so, why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of ??? Even if ??? also ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? a Tanna taught: also at the end of the teaching, ??? The rabbis taught: terumah ??? and first tithe ??? these are the words of Rabbi Akiva Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya says

דף פו,ב גמרא

??? and not ??? I would say Even ??? What is the reason? For R' ??? As it is written (in Numbers 18) and do not ??? "and say to them" ??? he read And the other one It is like that which was said by Rabbi Joshua ??? for he said: R' Yehoshua ??? and four ??? priests ??? and this one from them (Ezek. 44) the priests. ??? My son, ??? and Rabbi Akiva Here in this case, No. seeks is what you say? Do you really mean that? As it is written (in Numbers 18) ??? that specific in any place who that it is possible ??? in any place he has fulfilled his obligation a priest that do not It is possible ??? in the house of ??? And the other one all in a case who seeks that is not he is required wall and if he has already eaten ??? No. ??? this particular ??? Rabbi Elazar ben Azarya first tithe ??? He went Rabbi Akiva ??? my heart ??? he said ??? and I life it was said: On account of what ??? They disagreed about this, Rabbi ??? One says that did not have if they put it up on the altar in the days of Ezra ??? so that ??? priests upon it in the days of ??? This is satisfactory for one for he said: that did not have if they put it up on the altar It is because of this: thus ??? except ??? so that ??? upon it priests in the days of ??? It is because of this: priests ??? except the whole world ??? that did not have if they put it up on the altar in the days of Ezra and here in this other case, In this case, what they disagree about one master reasons that ??? and one master reasons that priests in the days of ??? for one for he said: ??? It is because of this: thus ??? Rabbi Akiva ??? my heart ??? except for one for he said: to the priests why is it that ??? my heart ??? Rabbi Akiva What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? my heart ??? thus he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: for him If it was that he came come? ??? to you and if ??? come? ??? to you and from where do we have it? i.e., what is our source for this claim that is not ??? in the days of Ezra As it is written (Ezra 8) ??? to ??? that comes on ??? in that place days three ??? Levi No. ??? in that place Rav Chisdah said at the beginning No. they were ??? except from ??? as it is said (II Chron. 19) ??? now We do not board ??? except from Israel as it is said ??? the public ???

דף פו,ב משנה

A daughter of Israel ??? It may be eaten from terumah did he die to it from him son of It may be eaten from terumah ??? It may be eaten ??? did he die to it from him son of It may be eaten ??? to Israel It may not be eaten No. from terumah and not ??? did he die to it from him son of It may not be eaten No. from terumah and not ??? did he die he built from Israel It may be eaten ??? did he die he built ??? It may be eaten from terumah did he die he built ??? It may not be eaten No. from terumah and not ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.