It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פח,א גמרא

What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? rabbis Shall I say It is because of this: ??? Hey, isn't it the case that two in reality ??? that he came ??? them we do not have ??? rabbis except Is this not It is because of this: ??? is comparable except reason out the logic. She something ??? doubt whether of milk doubt whether of ??? and he came a single witness and he said ??? for me ??? he ??? who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna No. ??? Here in this case, ??? a man And there is no meaning to the word a thing ??? less than ??? this one No. is comparable except ??? milk and he came a single witness and he said ??? for me ??? it was. that is not ??? who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna Even if they came among hundred No. ??? Here in this case, immediately and so when they came among two ??? one also ??? something ??? that which was sanctified for Temple use ??? This he immersed How so? If it was that are his It is because of this: ??? except ??? What then is the reasoning of If it was ??? reasoned separates terumah of his. on of his fellow it is not necessary for him the understanding of ??? It is because of this: ??? And if his reasoning is It is necessary for him the understanding of ??? and he said I ??? of him. ??? She ??? From where do we derive this? that which was sanctified for Temple use also If it was the sanctity of ??? It is because of this: ??? If it was the sanctity of ??? If it was that are his It is because of this: ??? upon it except ??? and he said ??? of him. ??? Master upon it She ??? From where do we derive this? ??? also If his reasoning is there are the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? and the sanctity of ??? them It is because of this: ??? And if his reasoning is yes. the laws of misappropriation of sacred things ??? prohibits in reality he ??? them ??? If it was that are his It is because of this: ??? upon it except ??? and he said I ??? Master upon it She ??? From where do we derive this? R' Zeira said from the midst of ??? upon it in the rear ??? upon it at the beginning No. ??? and not ??? It is because of this: ??? of it ??? from this and from this ??? Rav said They did not teach such a ruling except ??? one but: ??? by the mouth of two witnesses No. ??? upon it in the west he came a person and he arises and is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? it is not necessary to teach this that is not ??? for him If it was that is not ??? for him ??? one why is it that ??? it is not necessary to teach this ??? among two They said: We we were at ??? and until now and You he that is not ??? for him As it is written (Gen. 42) ??? Joseph ??? and they No. ??? and Rav Chisdah said This teaches that went out without ??? an elderly person came ??? an elderly person the end of the end of two and two ???

דף פח,ב גמרא

and that comes upon it ??? suspended he arises Rav Sheshet said For example, ??? to one ??? She ??? suspended ??? for me If so, what is there to say? Even if Rabbi ??? the son of Rabbi Yosi he does not come to say i.e., what he really means is not: except ??? witnesses and after this ??? but: ??? and after this ??? witnesses did not say as it is taught: two say did he die and two say No. did he die two say ??? and two say No. ??? Behold! This is No. ??? and if ??? No. ??? R' ??? the son of Rabbi Yosi he said ??? Thus said Rabbi ??? begins ??? I says ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? witnesses and after this ??? but: ??? and after this ??? witnesses Behold! This is No. ??? and thus he comes to say Rav also at a time i.e., in a case ??? witnesses and after this ??? To exclude ??? and there are for he said: The reason is ??? and after this ??? witnesses but: ??? witnesses and after this ??? like who ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba from where do we learn ??? No. running ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 21) ??? the master of ??? How so? Shall I say that is not ??? to one ??? and not ??? for me it's necessary to say this. ??? except Is this not ??? to one ??? for me And we have learned ??? Perhaps, ??? to it of him prohibits the priesthood that I And if you wish, I would say What then does it mean when it says ??? I would say ??? witnesses and after this ??? and R' ??? She Rav Ashi says What then does it mean when it says No. ??? for he says Rav No. ??? this one he said Rav one ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? that did not have ??? it is permitted. ??? to him Rav Huna said Rav said thus Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion one from a derivation ??? it was said: Shmuel said They did not teach such a ruling except that did not have ??? but: ??? No. ??? with what are we dealing? Shall I say ??? two For ??? for him What then does it mean when it says you shall except it is dealing with a case where there is only one. The reason is ??? this one ??? and Did not Ulla say: in all places ??? Torah a single witness Behold! here, two And there is no meaning to the word his words of one in a place two Here in this case, with what are we dealing? ??? giving witness and it is like that which was said by Rabbi ??? as it is taught: R' ??? says in all places ??? Torah a single witness he has walked after most of ??? "and they shall make two women ??? one ??? men ??? one And if you wish, I would say all in a case who has arrived a single witness is valid from the beginning even hundred women ??? one ??? Here in this case, with what are we dealing? For example, That it comes a woman from the beginning ??? thus R' ??? says in all places ??? Torah a single witness he has walked after most of ??? "and they shall make two women ??? One ??? men ??? one but: two women ??? one ??? and a fraction ??? it requires writ from this ??? This is satisfactory ??? writ except ??? why is it that ??? in reality he Rav Huna said ??? lest they shall say ??? this and exalted. this ??? a man ??? without writ If so, at the end of the teaching, where he teaches Watch out for leading vav And they said to her did he die ??? and after this came ??? it is permitted. ??? to him there i.e., in another mishna also Let him say ??? this ??? this ??? a man ??? that did not have ??? In reality lit: In the world ??? writ If so, Watch out for leading vav !! and it is found this he turns ??? like R' Yosi son of ??? for he said: from ??? forbidden from the betrothal it is permitted. this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, despite the fact

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.