It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף פט,א גמרא

??? to it the last writ No. ??? from ??? from this general principle it would follow that is not ??? writ For if it was ??? writ why is it that No. ??? from ??? except at the end of the teaching, They said: ??? in error" are they, But the beginning of the teaching, also They said: ??? in error" are they, ??? rabbis at the end of the teaching, also ??? But the beginning of the teaching, ??? at the end of the teaching, that is not ??? No. ??? It does not have ??? What is the reason? established to it rabbis her ketuba so that that lightweight should not be in His eyes ??? this one shall be lightweight in His eyes ??? It does not have fruits and not food and not ??? her ketuba ??? raised up i.e., separated from this ??? This is obvious! What would you have said? immediately ??? No. ??? It was taught there: yes. ??? from ??? on ??? and if he separated terumah in error its terumah terumah with intent he did not do anything at all. What then does it mean when it says he did not do anything at all. R' Chisda said he did not do anything at all. all the essence that even this particular ??? he returns ??? Rav he gave ??? he said he did not do anything at all. ??? ??? but: terumah you shall Rav Chisda did not say ??? he gave ??? For if it was is what you say? Do you really mean that? you shall terumah Oftentimes ??? and not ??? what is the difference here, ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? terumah and he shall return and separate terumah ??? No. a slave ??? and pointed out a contradiction. ??? Here in this case, The tanna teaches: in error its terumah terumah there i.e., in another mishna The tanna teaches: terumah and he shall return and separate terumah there i.e., in another mishna ??? for him ??? and pointed out a contradiction. ??? Here in this case, The tanna teaches: with intent No. One who acts anything there i.e., in another mishna We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? on ??? terumah and he shall return and separate terumah it is dealing with a case where there are two ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? No. ??? and for Rav, he gave ??? for he said: he did not do anything at all. ??? but: terumah you shall

דף פט,ב גמרא

what is the difference here, ??? For it was taught in a baraita from ??? on that do not ??? its terumah terumah and It may not be eaten until ??? upon it terumah ??? from someplace else that I Here in this case, ??? terumah that is elevated i.e., important She ??? for thus said Rabbi ??? from where do we learn ??? from the evil on ??? terumah As it is written (in Numbers 18) and not ??? upon it Watch out for leading vav he sinned ??? ??? from him and if yes. ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned For what reason ??? from the evil on ??? terumah He said to him Rabbah for Rav, ??? that you said he did not do anything at all. all the essence for even in the case where This certain individual ??? he returns ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? Perhaps ??? and not ??? who that it is possible something ??? you shall terumah but on account of Perhaps ??? rabbis ??? And so a court בית דין ??? a thing from the Torah He said to him and No. ??? For it was taught in a mishna: ??? a mamzer from this and from this This is satisfactory ??? a mamzer except ??? why is it that his wife She and a Jew lit, Israel ??? he ??? for him ??? He said to him Thus said Shmuel is forbidden ??? and thus For he came ??? that R' Yochanan said is forbidden ??? But why? a seminal emission for him a mamzer ??? Israel He sent to him Rav Chisda ??? in the hand of Rav Acha son of Rav Huna And there is no meaning to the word a court בית דין ??? a thing from the Torah For it was taught: From when a person ??? his wife a small one the academy of Shammai say ??? And the academy of Hillel say ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? to it ??? terumah the academy of Shammai say ??? even though that is not ??? I would say ??? and enter ??? So, too, here, ??? for him the academy of Shammai ??? If it was ??? to it ??? and if No. does not take effect to it ??? R' Eliezer says: ??? For didn't R' Eliezer say yes. It once happened a small one anything I would say ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? Avuah ??? to it and According to Rabbinic law, ??? to it the master of ??? a court בית דין he was ??? for he said: R' Isaac from where do we learn ??? a court בית דין he was ??? as it is said (Ezra 10) all who No. ??? the days ??? the captains and the elders ??? all ??? This is only in the case ??? R' Elazar he said from here (Josh. 19) ??? who ??? and Joshua bin Nun ??? the Children of Israel And so What is the connection between ??? next to the forefathers except to say to you Just as the forefathers ??? their children. all Just as ??? Even ??? the nation all Just as ??? to it Hey, isn't it the case that Here in this case, ??? to it and According to Rabbinic law, ??? to it the master of It is because of this: ??? to it did he die a commandment and who you shall did he die a commandment For it was taught: If it was ??? did he die a commandment all that do not to him ??? reads and others they answer that specific yes. this one will die a commandment Here in this case, also, immediately that is not ??? to it ??? and not ??? to it

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.