It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צד,א גמרא

??? for him He said to them Rav Sheishet ??? Watch out for leading vav And they said to her did he die ??? and after this did he die ??? and gets married and after this Watch out for leading vav And they said to her ??? they were the things ??? and the last a mamzer How so? Shall I say two and two What then does it mean when it says ??? immediately adjacent lit: leaning ??? And furthermore, a mamzer doubt whether a mamzer he And if you would say No. ??? this one When the baraita teaches at the end of the teaching, ??? a mamzer ??? he does not a mamzer Learn from this ??? The tanna teaches: except Is this not one and the reason ??? among two ??? this one Is this not thus ??? In reality lit: In the world two and two and Like that which was said by Rav Acha son of ??? Here in this case, also, ??? He said to him Rav ??? to Rav Ashi and there are those who say Rav Acha to Rav Ashi Come and hear: yes. the his wife she is believed to say did he die ??? and not ??? my sister ??? She ??? that is not ??? this one a single witness ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, yes. Watch out for leading vav "and the man faithfully to say did he die my brother ??? his wife and not ??? ??? he ??? that is not ??? this one a single witness ??? This is satisfactory regarding a woman It is because of this: ??? of it rabbis except regarding a man What is there to say? except For It is necessary to teach this Rabbi Akivah It is necessary to teach this For it might have entered your mind that I would say: Because and Rabbi Akiva said: there are a mamzer ??? I would say ??? Come and learn from this. ??? No. ??? Rava said: a single witness faithfully ??? From a "kal vachomer", ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? Is this not is it not all the more so? He said to him one of the rabbis to Raba She herself ??? he is spiritually cut off ??? Is this not No. ??? So rather, ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא No. ??? for him No. ??? a single witness also ??? for him No. ??? this ??? Rabbi Eliezer son of ??? Rav Yehudah said Rav said it was. for him for R' Eliezer Watch out for leading vav !! but for midrash, of him. ??? of him. ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 21) and the woman a divorcee ??? even No. ??? except ??? is invalid into the priesthood And this is like the position ???

דף צד,א משנה

who ??? his wife ??? and They said to him: ??? your wife and exalted. ??? and after this ??? his wife it is permitted. ???

דף צד,ב משנה

to him and it is permitted ??? the second and the second it is permitted. ??? and if ??? the first is permitted. in the second They said to him: ??? his wife and exalted. ??? and after this They said to him: standing it was ??? a mamzer ??? yes. a mamzer R' Yosei says all ??? by way of lit., through the hands of others invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself and all that do not invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of others he does not invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself

דף צד,ב גמרא

and even though ??? his wife ??? the sea that which helps Behold! ??? Watch out for leading vav But nevertheless, ??? his wife ??? and we do not say from the midst of ??? his wife upon it Let us say, Our mishna that is not like Rabbi Akiva. For if it was Rabbi Akiva ??? to it ??? as it is taught: all ??? yes. require from him writ except ??? a man ??? by the mouth of a court בית דין and Rabbi Akiva ??? Even ??? a woman And because of the fact for he said: Rabbi Akiva ??? writ ipso facto ??? upon it ??? to it ??? Is this not it was said: He ascended Thus said Rabbi ??? said Rabbi Chiyya son of Joseph Rav said This ??? How so? For example, ??? the his wife he has walked ??? the sea and he heard ??? and he stood and exalted. his wife that they said ??? that came first ??? it was. for him ??? and that one then the ruling is acceptable. He used the wording and that one ??? a woman also How so? For example, ??? a woman and the halacha is ??? the sea and he heard ??? he stood and exalted. ??? that they said ??? the first ??? it was. for him ??? Hey, isn't it the case that then the ruling is acceptable. He used the wording except ??? who that it is possible to say ??? it was. for him ??? He said to him: Rav Ashi for Rav, ??? If it was R' ??? Let the Tanna teach: also ??? for it is the case that ??? for him Rabbi Akivah for he said: ??? after death Is this not ??? as it is taught: (Lev. 20) in fire ??? that specific ??? that specific and One from them these are the words of R' Yishmael Rabbi Akiva says: that specific and ??? This is satisfactory ??? for he said: ??? There is this difference between them: For R' Yishmael reasoned one it is written and R' ??? reasoned both it is written then the ruling is acceptable. except to Raba for he said: ??? after death There is this difference between them: Let the Tanna teach: also ??? He said to him: ??? he read ??? who ??? he read ??? something ??? No. he is equivalent. his wife ??? in error ??? of it rabbis

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.