It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צה,א גמרא

??? a woman ??? No. ??? according to Torah law, in error No. ??? of it rabbis From where do we derive this? that is not ??? as it is taught: (Num. 8) it it ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? that it is possible Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as in a place who has sex with prohibits ??? a place who has sex with prohibits a donkey is it not logical ??? R' Yehudah said: No. ??? the academy of Shammai and the academy of Hillel ??? on ??? his wife on Just as ??? on ??? his wife ??? say invalidates it And the academy of Hillel say No. invalidates it R' Yosi said No. ??? the academy of Shammai And the academy of Hillel ??? on ??? his wife that did not have invalidates it his wife on Just as ??? on ??? say invalidates it And the academy of Hillel say No. invalidates it on account of ??? he is permitted. in all the women ??? but it it is permitted. in all ??? he ??? but it ??? is greater than prohibits ??? that he was ??? in all ??? but it No. ??? except ??? Is it not the case that It would be a logical inference for just as he ??? in all men ??? to it It is not ??? to it She that did not have ??? except ??? to him is it not logical that did not have ??? to him ??? to him and this justice. ??? from where do we learn Scripture states: it it ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rabbi Ami said Raysh Lakish said What is the reason? of Rabbi Yehudah As it is written (Lev. 20) in fire ??? that specific ??? And so all the house all of it ??? if he does not one topic ??? one topic ??? Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said That is not the halacha like Rabbi Yehudah This certain individual ??? Rav Yehudah ??? He said to him: If it was Is this not for Shmuel said: That is not the halacha like Rabbi Yehudah ??? What then does it mean when it says prohibits ??? Rav Chisdah said he turns ??? came upon it This ??? upon it That this came upon it Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? upon it That this Just as ??? which provides ??? prohibits the world except he said Reish Lakish: ??? for one Shall I say after And it is like Rav ??? for he said: av Hamnunah ??? forbidden ??? Just as ??? which provides ??? except ??? a slave of it ??? This ??? upon it That this came upon it Watch out for leading vav !! And the other one ??? upon it That this why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of upon it came two Even if a slave of it also ??? This does not present any difficulty because there is no contradiction ??? for he said: yes. ??? after ??? except even he gave to it writ and even ??? to it except Rabbi Yochanan said: Sotah Sotah for one Shall I say ??? came upon it the master of ??? upon it ??? why does he the Tanna seize on the particular case of came upon it even he gave to it writ and even he said yes. I ??? except Sotah ??? This prohibits ??? he prohibits a donkey he ??? a man

דף צה,ב גמרא

except Rabba said: ??? a man and thus For he came ??? that R' Yochanan said ??? a man And what does it mean when it says a seminal emission to it prohibits ??? that do not ??? all his days Another teaching is like this: Abba ??? he said It is because of this: Rabbi Eliezer ??? a man for just as in a place that comes on prohibits ??? that do not ??? all his days ??? that comes on prohibits a donkey ??? all his days is it not logical ??? Scripture states: it it ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? Rabbi Yosei says: all ??? What then does it mean when it says he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: R' Yosi Shall I say for he says a Tanna taught: that came first ??? his wife ??? the sea ??? and the wife lit. his wife ??? Rabbi Yosei so that thus it will be ??? also ??? If so, all that do not invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of others yes. invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself all that do not invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself he does not invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of others ??? for him So rather, so that thus it will be ??? his wife also ??? all ??? all that is not invalidates it What then does it mean when it says ??? Rav Ami said He interprets it as referring to the earlier text ??? a court בית דין ??? from ??? by the mouth of witnesses ??? proper his strength of a court בית דין ??? from ??? and he said Watch out for leading vav And the first tanna They did not teach this לא שנו by the mouth of witnesses ??? and They did not teach this לא שנו ??? a court ??? and he said for him Rabbi Yosei by the mouth of a court ??? by way of lit., through the hands of others invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself by the mouth of witnesses ??? invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of others he does not invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself Rabbi Isaac ??? he said In reality lit: In the world ??? The tanna used the wording ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna used the wording ??? this one ??? this one ??? his wife ??? and he said a Tanna taught: that came first there is no difference his wife ??? and there is no difference ??? and the wife lit. his wife ??? and he said for him Rabbi Yosei his wife ??? to say ??? it was. for him ??? invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of after he does not invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself ??? That there are to say ??? it was. for him ??? and invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of others Even invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi Rav Yosef disagreed And who said it? Shmuel thus ??? Rav said: Behold! She ??? a man And Shmuel said It is not ??? a man Rav Huna said For example, ??? the his wife he has walked to him ??? the sea and he heard ??? and he stood and exalted. his wife of Rav he said Behold! She ??? a man forbidden ??? And Shmuel said It is not ??? a man ??? for him He said to him Abaye And from where do you derive and so when Shmuel said The halacha is like Rabbi Yosi ??? Isaac ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: Perhaps ??? Ami he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: and So, too, ??? Isaac ??? From where can you derive ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.