It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צו,א גמרא

and Perhaps ??? invalidates it So, too, From where can you derive ??? Perhaps ??? For Rav Huna A general principle: ??? what they disagree about for he said: av Hamnunah ??? forbidden ??? of Rav he said Behold! She ??? a man ??? And Shmuel said It is not ??? a man and not ??? what they disagree about of Rav he said Behold! She ??? a man and not ??? of it ??? And Shmuel said It is not ??? a man ??? of it ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? of it one ??? one from this general principle it would follow ??? it was said:

דף צו,א משנה

They said to him: ??? your wife and exalted. ??? and exalted. ??? and exalted. ??? and exalted. ??? all of them ??? is permitted. in the first, ??? is forbidden in the second ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? One from them ??? and if came on ??? after ??? is permitted. in the second ??? is forbidden ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? One from them ??? son of nine two and one day he renders invalid by way of lit., through the hands of ??? invalidate it on ??? except he renders invalid at first ??? invalidate it at first the end of How so? son of nine two and one day who has sex with ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? upon it ??? "and they shall make of it ??? were given writ or ??? invalidate it on ???

דף צו,א גמרא

because all of them Is this not after ??? the first ??? Rav Sheshet said after ??? the first ??? son of nine two ??? son of nine two and one day at first ??? in the rear of No. ??? Rav ??? One who makes ??? and after this came ??? that he was son of ??? two and one day upon it ??? They said: ??? even in the rear of ??? at first ??? in the rear of No. ??? even in the rear of ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: except he renders invalid at first there are. at first the end of How so? son of nine two and one day who has sex with ??? and etc. ??? And this is what the tanna means to teach: son of nine two and one day he renders invalid at first there are. invalidate it at first the end of In what matters are we saying this? ??? but: ??? Even if in the rear of How so? son of ??? two and one day that comes on ??? by way of lit., through the hands of ??? and who it has ??? A general principle: by way of lit., through the hands of ??? For it was taught: son of ??? two and one day he renders invalid In the matter one ??? invalidate it on ??? items he renders invalid by way of lit., through the hands of ??? invalidate it on ??? between at the beginning between in the rear of he the Tanna does distinguish. ??? in the rear of No. ??? he the Tanna does not distinguish. it was said: also Rav Yehudah said that Shmuel said he has writ and thus Rav said ??? son of ??? he has ??? Another teaching is like this: he has writ and he has ??? These are the words of Rabbi Meir. reasoned ??? he has writ For it was taught: they make ??? son of nine ??? Rabbi Meir says: they make ??? son of nine ??? and if ??? Let the Tanna teach: ??? Rav Huna said the son of of Rav Joshua it has ??? to Rabban Gamliel for he said: yes. writ after writ that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? after The greatness and a child after a child but: The greatness after a child from those According to the sages, that they said there are writ after writ that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי ??? after The greatness or in the case of a child. after a child but: a child after The greatness Watch out for leading vav And ??? not

דף צו,ב משנה

son of ??? two and one day who has sex with ??? and after this came upon it ??? that he was son of ??? two and one day invalidates it on ??? Rabbi Shimon says: No. invalidates it son of ??? two and one day who has sex with ??? and after this came on ??? invalidates it by way of lit., through the hands of himself Rabbi Shimon says: No. invalidates it

דף צו,ב גמרא

It was taught: He said to them: Rabbi Shimon to the sages if ??? the first ??? the second arrival; It is not ??? and if ??? the first It is not ??? the second arrival; also It is not ??? Our mishna that is not ??? as it is taught: ben Azzai says there are ??? after ??? with two ??? One And there is no meaning to the word ??? after ??? one

דף צו,ב משנה

son of nine two and one day who has sex with ??? did he die ??? and not ??? exalted. a woman did he die Behold! This is ??? son of nine two and one day who has sex with ??? exalted. a woman ??? did he die if No. know ??? and not ??? or ??? or ??? Rabbi Shimon says: ??? -- this refers to ??? one that he was son of ??? two and one day and one that he was son of twenty that did not have ??? two ???

דף צו,ב גמרא

Rabba said: this one ??? rabbis ??? two ??? No. ??? No. you say in a case That there are ??? That there are ??? It is because of this: ??? for it is the case that Here in this case, there is not in this case. ??? No. ??? exalted. a woman did he die ??? about this teaching For the Rabbis taught a mute and a child ??? and they died? ??? from ??? and from ??? son of nine and etc. ??? son of ??? Rav said No. they make ??? son of ??? And Shmuel said they make "and they shall make and thus that R' Yochanan said they make "and they shall make ??? She ??? a Tanna taught: ??? It is because of this: ??? and we had heard ??? in the case of a child. and that one for he said: The greatness It is because of this: ??? he arises and that one a Tanna taught: ??? he reasons for himself. they make and not ??? It is because of this: ??? and we had heard in the case of a child. and it is the law ??? and that one for he says in the case of a child. ??? he arises He went R' Elazar he said ??? among ??? and not he said in the name of R' Yochanan "Hear!" Rabbi Yochanan ??? the yoke of ??? Rabbi Ami and R' Assi And they said to him It is not thus ??? in the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue of ??? in which there is on its head ??? in it Rabbi Eliezer and Rabbi Yosei, until ??? a Torah scroll ??? except I would say ??? a Torah scroll ??? and it was the case that in that place Rabbi Yosei son of ??? he said ??? I if No. it shall be the House of Assembly i.e., the synagogue -- this refers to by some texts star-worship in other texts idolatry and thus it was. he returns ??? he said ??? also the yoke of ??? R' Ya'akov son of This He said to him (Josh. 11) as it was ??? Hashem Moses his male slave thus ??? Moses Joshua and thus One who acts Joshua does not turn away a thing from all who ??? Hashem Moses And so on any thing who said Joshua would say to them thus said for me Moses except Joshua who dwells ??? The entirety ??? of Moses She Even R' Elazar ??? who dwells ??? The entirety ??? For ??? She He said to them: On account of what If it was "You ??? This ??? and Rabbi Yochanan What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? all this for he said: Rav Yehudah Rav said What then does it mean that it is written (Ps. 61) ??? And so ??? to a person ??? with two ??? except he said David before the Holy One, Who is Blessed Master of the world May it be Your will

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.