It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף צז,א גמרא

??? a thing ??? in this world, for he said: Rabbi Yochanan It is because of this: Rabbi Shimon son of ??? all a scholar תלמיד חכם for they would say a thing ??? in the world" ??? in the grave he said R' Isaac son of ??? (and there are those who say Shimon ??? What scripture supports this position? (Song of Songs 7) ??? the good walks ??? my lips they sleep ??? of grapes Just as ??? of grapes immediately ??? a person its spur lit., its finger upon it immediately ??? Even scholars immediately for they would say a thing ??? in this world, ??? one son of ??? two ??? They challenged this from a baraita: son of twenty year" that did not have ??? two ??? proof that he was son of twenty This is only in the case ??? No. ??? and not ??? the daughter of twenty year" that did not have ??? two ??? proof that it the daughter of twenty but it ??? No. ??? and not ??? this one was it said; He ascended Thus said Rabbi Shmuel son of Isaac Rav said This is only in the case ??? to him ??? Rabba said: ??? also where he teaches This is only in the case ??? Learn from this And so No. ??? to him ??? up to how much It was taught by of the academy of Rabbi Chiyya until most of his years For they came in front of Raba If it was ??? He said to them ??? and if ??? He said to them ??? signs There were times when ??? and There were times when ???

דף צז,א משנה

raise on ??? and on ??? on ??? he is liable ??? a person ??? his father ??? his father ??? his son ??? his son Rabbi Yehudah ??? his father ??? his father

דף צז,א גמרא

??? about this teaching ??? a woman is permitted. ??? exalted. a woman is forbidden ??? They challenged this from a baraita: ??? from the his wife is forbidden ??? According to Rabbinic law, and all in a case That there are ??? According to Rabbinic law, It was taught by raise initially For We have learnt in a Mishna: Our mishna after death From where do we derive this? ??? in all of them it is said lying down here, it is said ??? to say to you a way ??? Torah He said to him Rav ??? Except I can object with text from here: regarding ??? As it is written (Lev. 20) a man who ??? ??? the daughter of his father or the daughter of of its mother Here, too, a way ??? he ??? a way lying down Sarai He said to him ??? are written in the Torah ??? lying down Rava said: ??? a woman is permitted. ??? from here it is written (Lev. 18) ??? the daughter of ??? or the daughter of ??? No. ??? this one the daughter of he built ??? the daughter of ??? and then it is written ??? a woman ??? No. ??? the daughter of he built and the daughter of ??? No. ??? How so? here, ??? here, ??? I ??? the remainder of it is written in them? ??? that it is possible the remainder of ??? there is not in this case. ??? Rabbi Yehudah ??? his father ??? Rav Gidel said that Rav said What is the reason? of Rabbi Yehudah As it is written (Deut. 23) No. ??? a man ??? his father and not ??? his father ??? who saw his father No. ??? And from where do you derive ??? it is written As it is written ??? (Deut. 22) and gave Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? silver And the rabbbis If it was it was. right next lit: and leaning for him ??? now that is not right next lit: and leaning for him should bring himself ??? for he said: Rav ??? Shmuel said ??? of his father is what the scripture says. And what does it mean when it says ??? his father ??? No. ??? Is it not enough for him It is because of this: ??? to cross over upon it with two ??? Is it not enough for him It is because of this: ??? to cross over upon it in a case where there are three ??? And if you wish, I would say after death

דף צז,ב גמרא

??? and not ??? This is only in the case ??? and I ??? he said pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama that is not like R' Yehudah ??? he ??? he ??? I That this ??? It concerns itself ??? that comes on Watch out for leading vav or his daughter for peace. to you ??? the daughter of ??? I It concerns itself ??? that comes on the daughter of Watch out for leading vav or his daughter ??? they cried, ??? That this ??? he son of and I ??? the brother It concerns itself ??? that comes on the daughter of his son ??? This is only in the case ??? This is only in the case the master of This is only in the case son of the master of This is only in the case ??? and I ??? and not he will give ??? My son, ??? It concerns itself ??? that comes on of its mother ??? from it the daughter of and he returned came on it the daughter of and he returned an elderly person came upon it ??? from it children" I and my brother I and your father: my brother I ??? my brother It concerns itself ??? that comes on of its mother ??? from it two the daughters of and he returned came on One from them ??? from it son of ??? for him ??? for him thus I and My son, my brother I and your father: My son, my brother I ??? My son, my brother this one ??? also It concerns itself For example, Reuben? in which there is to him two the daughters of and he came Shimon ??? one ??? and he came son of Levi ??? one ??? and he said for him the son of ??? for there to be wheat the son of ???

דף צז,ב משנה

the female convert Watch out for leading vav or who have been converted ??? No. ??? and not ??? even ??? of ??? that did not have ??? and the second ??? and thus a maidservant Watch out for leading vav or who have been freed ??? with her

דף צז,ב גמרא

My son, ??? them Rav Acha son of Ya'akov ??? He said to him: Raba Hey, isn't it the case that Rav Sheishet ??? He said to him he ??? and I ??? from ??? and not from ??? does not disagree who permits from ??? and not from ??? does not disagree ??? Because specifically, where they disagree is this: from ??? and from ??? one who permits according to Abba ??? for it is the case that My son, ??? them and Rav Sheishet ??? them also My son, ??? and there are for he said: ??? Rav Acha son of Ya'akov even ??? from ??? and What is the reason מאי טעמא ??? he is equivalent. We have learnt in a Mishna: the female convert Watch out for leading vav or who have been converted ??? No. ??? and not ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא Is this not It is because of this: ??? No. ??? chalitza ??? and they also ??? Hey, isn't it the case that The tanna teaches: even If you say, This is satisfactory ??? we were where he teaches even ??? that did not have ??? and the second ??? even thus ??? except If you say, ??? What then does it mean when it says even ??? that they give birth ??? and comes ??? Watch out for leading vav But nevertheless, Sarai that it is possible that they said Here, too, ??? where he teaches even If you say, This is satisfactory ??? we were where he teaches even ??? that they give birth ??? Watch out for leading vav But nevertheless, ??? except If you say, ??? What then does it mean when it says Even if ??? that did not have ??? and the second ??? he is equivalent. even thus ??? Come and hear: two ??? is destiny? ??? and thus ??? No. ??? and not ??? And there is no meaning to the word they are obligated It is because of this: ??? it was ??? that did not have ??? and that they give birth ??? No. ??? and not ??? but: they are obligated It is because of this: ??? it was ??? and that they give birth ??? Behold! there are. ??? for all ??? The tanna teaches: Regardless, yes. they are obligated It is because of this: ??? there is not in this case.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.