Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף לו,א גמרא
He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav ??? son of Abba if he was a priest ??? upon it blood ??? blood ??? of one suffering from tzara'at ??? of one suffering from tzara'at As it is written (Lev. 14) this ??? between The greatness or whether a child We have learnt in a Mishna: the priests. ??? in the Holy Temple ??? they are obligated this one ??? are exempt except ??? an invalidating act nevertheless If you say, This is satisfactory Emmissaries of heaven. are they, we were ??? an invalidating act nevertheless except If you say, Emmissaries ??? are they, why is it that ??? an invalidating act nevertheless Let us say, for him ??? and not ??? They said: that I regarding an invalidating act nevertheless For scripture said: (Lev. 7) No. ??? to him from all ??? Back to the main body of the text: that R' Yochanan said The entirety they all require the understanding of except ??? atonement for behold! a person sends sacrifice on his children and on ??? who were minors Except I can object with text from here: ??? a person A sin-offering milk on his fellow which provides a person sends on his wife a mute like R' Yehudah Why is it that R' Elazar said ??? A sin-offering milk on his fellow No. One who acts anything his wife a mute How so? If it was ??? a mute Is this not the daughter of sacrifice She and if ??? this one Thus said Rabbi ??? he said R' Abahu Rabbi Yochanan said: he ate milk ??? sacrifice ??? and he returned ??? is invalid, Because ??? Except I can object with text from here: ??? a person Passover on his fellow which provides a person sends on his children and on ??? who were minors Why is it that R' Eliezer said ??? Passover on his fellow No. One who acts anything Rabbi Zeira said (Ex. 12) ??? the forefathers Is this not a law established by the Torah And from where do you derive ??? One who says to his children Behold, I am slaughtering the Paschal offering on who ??? from among you ??? to Jerusalem immediately ??? his head and the majority of his body took possession ??? ??? with it And if you say ??? a law established by the Torah on ??? he arises ??? them except For what reason them for he said: ??? so that ??? Another teaching is like this: It once happened he was ??? the daughters of to the children ??? the daughters of ??? And lack of children ??? and separates terumah ??? etc.
דף לו,ב גמרא
They posed this difficulty: ??? of his. on of his fellow It is necessary for him ??? or No. who say immediately ??? he to him It is not necessary the understanding of or, perhaps, a commandment ??? She it's settled. for him ??? Come and hear: separates terumah ??? and ??? with what are we dealing? Shall I say from the master of ??? on of the master of ??? Shall I say ??? one ??? except ??? this one ??? for him ??? except of his. on of ??? Shall I say ??? this one ??? for him except Is this not ??? of his. separates terumah on of his fellow ??? It is necessary for him the understanding of this one ??? for him except Is this not it is not necessary the understanding of In reality lit: In the world is from that which is belonging to the master of ??? on the master of ??? Like that which was said by Raba in the case of one who says all One who wishes ??? and separate terumah Here in this case, also, in the case of one who says and etc. Rabbi brought this very question ??? Zeira ??? of his. on of his fellow ??? benefit of who who say If it was Is this not ??? who ??? or, perhaps, If it was Is this not ??? No. there shall be ??? terumah He said to him Scripture states: (Deut. 14) all ??? your seed ??? separates terumah ??? and ??? And if you say ??? benefit ??? This one comes to from those for him except Learn from this ??? benefit ??? They said: No. is from that which is belonging to the master of ??? on of the master of ??? in the case of one who says all One who wishes ??? and separate terumah Come and hear: for he said: R' Abahu R' Yochanan said: ??? Watch out for leading vav plus a fifth ??? they shall make a substitution. ??? of his. on that is not are his ??? benefit ??? but not ??? the written Torah What is the reason מאי טעמא No. ??? It is because of this: ??? for him ??? also ??? for him Shmuel said in a place ??? the reward for on ??? And there is no meaning to the word ??? the reward for on ??? What then does it mean when it says ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.