Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף עג,א גמרא
Here in this case, also, for he said: for him ??? to it ??? "Hear!" ??? to it he reasoned Perhaps ??? he is required pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama A deaf person What then? ??? if ??? to say the master of ??? without ??? It is because of this: a thing ??? he but: A deaf person ??? son of ??? he we were For R' Zeira for he said: Rabbi Zeira all ??? yes. ??? is essential in it and all that do not ??? is essential in it or, perhaps, and he heard ??? No. is essential. Rabba said: Come and hear: and he heard ??? creates an exclusion ??? A deaf person Learn from this They posed this difficulty: the master of What then? ??? to have two ??? "At the same time," it ??? or This Mishna is not being precise /davka/ Ravina said Come and hear: yes. ??? two ??? as one because of ??? R' Yehuda says: No. from the Name is this except It is because of this: ??? (Num. 5) ??? it ???
דף עג,ב משנה
??? Twelve new and a widow ??? day R' Eliezer says: Because ??? he is liable ??? but the sages say yes. ??? until ???
דף עג,ב גמרא
Rabbah said ??? the first And they said a thing one For it was taught in a baraita ??? for a virgin Twelve new ??? herself they come Twelve new ??? of his. ??? from terumah but: ??? he does not one may feed from terumah ??? Six months before ??? Six months before ??? and even all of them before ??? lacking day ??? or all of them before ??? lacking day ??? It is not ??? from terumah this is the Mishnah the first a court בית דין of after them And they said yes. the his wife ??? from terumah until ??? He said to him Abaye Perhaps No. She Up to this point, No. ??? we had heard ??? the first except ??? from terumah is a law established by the Rabbis but: nedarim-vows to bring an offering a law established by the Torah I would say No. and Up to this point, No. ??? for him to R' Eliezer except regarding nedarim-vows to bring an offering Watch out for leading vav And it is like Rav ??? in the name of Raba for he said: all ??? on the understanding of ??? She ??? but: terumah even According to Rabbinic law, also No. ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.