It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף עח,א גמרא

this ??? wise permits And there is no meaning to the word the master of permits Another teaching this ??? the master of ??? And there is no meaning to the word wise ??? that it is possible for just as the master of that do not permits ??? wise ??? is it not logical ??? Scripture states: this ??? the master of ??? And there is no meaning to the word wise ??? it is said here, this ??? and it is said there (Lev. 17) this ??? except Just as ??? except "... Aharon and his sons and all Israel Even The passage about nedarim-vows to bring an offering "... Aharon and his sons and all Israel for just as here, ??? Even there ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion Rav Acha said son of Ya'akov ??? three ??? Hey, isn't it the case that (Num. 30) ??? it is written Rav Chisdah said (and there are those who say R' Yochanan privately ??? except for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion Rav Sheshet said to say in which there is Watch out for leading vav !! and the request ??? to the academy of Shammai for he said: yes. Watch out for leading vav !! and the request ??? As it is written ??? except for what Watch out for leading vav And the halacha is according to the opinion the academy of Shammai who does not have ??? the value of this ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering for what it is written to say wise permits And there is no meaning to the word the master of permits the master of ??? And there is no meaning to the word wise ??? this ??? except for what it is written to say on ??? he is liable and He is not liable on ??? except to the academy of Shammai ??? three ??? From where do we derive this? ??? them ??? son of he gave As it is written (Lev. 23) And he said Moses ??? Hashem to the Children of Israel For it was taught: Rabbi Yosei the Gallilean says ??? and not ??? Sabbath creation with them ben Azzai says ??? It is not said The passage about nedarim-vows to bring an offering with them Rav ??? son of he gave has a problem this one ??? he came ??? in front of Rav ??? and not he found he came ??? He said to him ??? Hashem ??? and not ??? Sabbath creation with them Hey, isn't it the case that it is written Sabbath with them And, too, ??? Hashem ??? and not ??? The passage about nedarim-vows to bring an offering with them Hey, isn't it the case that ??? He said to him Watch out for leading vav And this is what the tanna means to teach:

דף עח,ב גמרא

??? Hashem they all require kiddush a court בית דין Sabbath creation yes. it requires kiddush a court בית דין ??? Hashem they all require ??? And there is no meaning to the word The passage about nedarim-vows to bring an offering they all require ??? Even if a court ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? nedarim-vows to bring an offering ??? it is written Rav Chisdah said (and there are those who say Rabbi Yochanan privately ??? Rabbi Chanina said: ??? in order ??? even from here and until ??? days He challenged this "He" meaning... Raba when does the previous statement apply? And they said did he die ??? is a voluntary act to a father at a time i.e., in a case that did not have "Hear!" ??? or ??? or ??? did he die on that very day but: "Hear!" stood i.e., as long as he lived or ??? did he die by day of after him: yes. It is possible ??? Is this not ??? in order ??? No. ??? in order to establish If so, we were or "Hear!" stood i.e., as long as he lived except ??? He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Chisda ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.