Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.
דף כב,א גמרא
a Tanna taught: also But the beginning of the teaching, ??? Come and hear: the his wife ??? and after this ??? to it ??? A sin-offering of a bird: It is not ??? An elevation-offering of a bird: And if it enters your mind to argue that the master of ??? also An elevation-offering of a bird: and Rather, what can we conclude? ??? He uprooted A sin-offering of a bird: also No. ??? Here, too, and So, with whom does it agree? R' Elazar ??? She as it is taught: ??? says Just as Scripture states: (Num. 6) ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned on ??? And so ??? Watch out for leading vav he sinned this except because of ??? himself from the wine is called a sinner Is it not the case that items is a kal vachomer for just as this that did not have ??? himself except from the wine is called a sinner ??? himself from all a thing compared to the one case, how much more so the other! Come and hear: as it is taught: clearly and explicitly the his wife ??? and he said and as for me, came ??? of the first ??? to it She it is permitted. ??? forbidden Learn from this the master of ??? Rabbi Shimon says: if he said to it ??? are permitted
דף כב,ב גמרא
Mar Zutra the son of of Rav ??? he said This we were ??? son of Chama who seeks pointed out a contradiction. son of Chama Behold! by the ??? zevach-offering peace-offerings What then? For ??? or, perhaps, ??? who he is equivalent. there i.e., in another mishna immediately for he said: Behold! by the ??? zevach-offering peace-offerings even though ??? he has already eaten outside ??? made kiddush, But here, in this case, Watch out for leading vav !! And if it enters your mind to argue that ??? this one ??? to it ??? that it is possible that they said we were ??? son of Chama ??? he said to it ??? What then? ??? the validity ??? or, perhaps, ??? to it ??? Come and hear: the his wife ??? and he heard ??? and he said and as for me, It is impossible ??? and if You might have thought For he said to it ??? to it ??? and that are his could not except Is this not Learn from this ??? and Therefore, he that is not ??? this one a woman that which she said ??? She also it is permitted. No. In reality lit: In the world ??? and here in this other case, immediately for he said: to it and as for me, ??? stood i.e., as long as he lived ??? he is equivalent. and if ??? and if No. ??? a Nazir and and he said "Amen" ??? of it are his ??? They challenged this from a baraita: ??? a Nazir and and he said "Amen" both are forbidden And if not, both are permitted because of ??? Rav Yehudah said It was taught by ??? of it are his stood i.e., as long as he lived Abaye said Even if you say ??? For example, for he says to it ??? a Nazir and that he came He hangs ???
Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.