It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כג,א גמרא

Our mishna For example, he said: to it ??? a Nazir and What then does it mean when it says It is because of this: thus ??? of it are his stood i.e., as long as he lived

דף כג,א משנה

the his wife ??? it was drink ??? and imparts tumah ??? behold! This is הרי זה ??? ??? to it ??? but it No. ??? to it ??? it was drink ??? and imparts tumah ??? It is not ??? ??? Rabbi Yehudah says if It is not ??? ???

דף כג,א גמרא

The Rabbis taught (Num. 30) ??? And Hashem ??? to it ??? to it ??? but it No. ??? is what the scripture says. that it it requires atonement ??? Rabbi Akiva next to ??? this he was ??? for just as who ??? to ascend in his hand meat ??? He ascended in his hand meat ??? required atonement ??? to ascend in his hand meat ??? He ascended in his hand meat ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! ??? In the matter You say (Lev. 5) and not know and a guilt-offering and exalted. ??? for just as who ??? to ascend in his hand meat ??? He ascended in his hand meat ??? For example, ??? doubt whether of ??? doubt whether of milk Scripture states: and exalted. ??? who ??? to ascend in his hand meat ??? He ascended in his hand meat ??? son of Yehudah says and not know and a guilt-offering and exalted. ??? for just as who ??? to ascend in his hand meat ??? He ascended in his hand meat ??? For example, two cuts One of milk and one of ??? and exalted. ??? to ascend in his hand meat ??? He ascended in his hand meat ??? compared to the one case, how much more so the other! on This item ??? and all Behold! why do I have they all require For if it was a Tanna taught: regarding a woman there i.e., in another mishna he ??? atonement ??? It is because of this: originally ??? but: ??? doubt whether of milk doubt whether of ??? it does not require atonement ??? And if it was said ??? That there are ??? but: a woman ??? to it ??? of a permission No. ??? atonement ??? And if it was said Behold! both then I might incorrectly say: Behold! both he ??? that is not ??? but: two cuts One of milk and one of ??? No. ??? for him ??? Come and learn from this. that is not ??? Rabbah bar bar Channah said Rabbi Yochanan said: What then does it mean that it is written (Hosea 14) For ??? Hashem ??? shall go with them." ??? with them." is from that which is belonging to for two people ??? ??? one he ate ??? a commandment and one he ate ??? food that is large this that ate ??? a commandment ??? shall go with them." and this that ate ??? food that is large ??? with them." He said to him: Reish Lakish: This a wicked person ??? for him ??? that is not ??? does he act? a commandment from ??? Passover from this ??? does he act? except is from that which is belonging to for two people this his wife ??? with it and this his wife ??? with it to this ??? to him his wife and to this ??? to him ??? this ??? to him his wife righteous shall go with them." and this ??? to him ??? with them." who he is equivalent. We we say it. one a way Here in this case, two the road. except is from that which is belonging to ??? and two ??? with it there are. ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of a commandment ??? shall go with them." he ??? for the sake of lit. in the name of transgression ??? with them." and Perhaps he also ??? a commandment ??? Rabbi Yochanan said: all ??? because of lit. on the reputation of transgression it is said (Gen. 13) ??? Lot (Gen. 39) ??? the eye of ??? (Judges 14) For She pleasing in my eyes." fears (Gen. 34) fears it ??? son of a donkey all a loaf the Jordan (Prov. 6) For ??? a woman ??? until a loaf bread For a bride ??? (Hosea 2) ??? "After ??? Hey, isn't it the case that ??? a Tanna taught: It is because of this: Rabbi Yosei son of Rav ??? For what reason dots on ??? (Gen. 19) ??? of ??? to say ??? No. know but: ??? know And what does it mean when it says it was. for him ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? it was. practical distinction ??? other than this No. It was necessary ??? Raba What then does it mean that it is written (Prov. 18) ??? strength

דף כג,ב גמרא

??? strength this Lot ??? ??? (Deut. 23) No. ??? in the congregation of Hashem ??? Raba (and there are those who say Rabbi Isaac What then does it mean that it is written (Prov. 18) ??? He requests ??? and with all ??? He requests ??? this Lot and with all ??? ??? For it was taught in a baraita ??? are forbidden and their prohibition prohibits the world Ulla said ??? they have fulfilled the mitzvah from it kings and prophets ??? upon it how much ??? from Israel he said ??? son of Isaac that is large transgression ??? that did not have ??? For didn't Rav Yehudah say Rav said In reality lit: In the world ??? a person in the Torah ??? Even if that did not have ??? that did not have ??? came ??? except I would say ??? that did not have ??? As it is written (Judges 5) ??? one women ??? Sarah ??? Rachel and Leah that R' Yochanan said "satisfied" ??? the master of that specific a wicked person At that very hour as it is said (Judges 5) between ??? he bowed stillborn lit., fallen he lay down etc. And then it happened that ??? that R' Yochanan said all ??? of the wicked ones It is not except evil next to righteous as it is said (Gen. 31) ??? to you ??? with Ya'akov ??? and until evil" This is satisfactory evil" then the ruling is acceptable. except good why is it that No. except Is this not Learn from this ??? evil She ??? Back to the main body of the text: Rav Yehudah said Rav said In reality lit: In the world ??? a person in the Torah ??? Even if that did not have ??? that did not have ??? came ??? Balak the wicked, took possession ??? from him Ruth: and R' Yosi said the son of Rabbi Chanina Ruth: the daughter of his son of ??? a king Moav it was Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba said that R' Yochanan said from where do we learn that do not the Holy One, Who is Blessed ??? Even if the reward for ??? For this ??? Moav He said to him the Merciful One (Deut. 2) to ??? Moav and do not ??? with them." war war he that is not but: ??? And even ??? son of with me" He said to him: (Deut. 2) to ??? and do not ??? with them." even ??? No. ??? A general principle: said Rabbi Chiyya son of Avin: R' Yehoshua said: son of ??? In reality lit: In the world he shall precede a person for a matter of a commandment ??? night One ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.