It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף כד,א גמרא

it has taken possession to the east four ???

דף כד,א משנה

the his wife ??? ??? and after this ??? to it ??? if are his it was ??? and it shall go to pasture ??? and if of it it was ??? they shall be allowed to die of natural causes and ascend ??? an elevation-offering peace-offerings ??? peace-offerings and they are eaten ??? one and are not ??? bread they were to it coins ??? coins ??? he is equivalent. A sin-offering shall go to the Sea of Salt benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. of them he is equivalent. an elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering but the laws of misappropriation apply to them, he is equivalent. peace-offerings ??? peace-offerings and they are eaten ??? one And there is no meaning to the word ??? bread

דף כד,א גמרא

Which Tanna taught: ??? No. ??? to it Rav Chisdah said It is the rabbis' position For if it was ??? it is Rabbi Yehudah why is it that ??? and it shall go to pasture ??? this one ??? to it as it is taught: R' Yehuda says: a person sends sacrifice ??? on his wife and thus all ??? that it ??? the writing of to it all liens on for there is ??? by the from ??? Rava said: Even if you say R' Yehudah For ??? to it ??? to it ??? that is not Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements to it No. that it is possible that they said Which Tanna taught: Rav Chisdah said it is Rabbi Yehudah And so ??? to it ??? to it ??? that is not Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements to it No. For if it was rabbis No. ??? to it A general principle: except How so? ??? to it For example, ??? to it And because of the fact ??? to it it was. ???

דף כד,ב גמרא

Rava said: Even if you say rabbis For ??? to it also ??? to it ??? that is not Watch out for leading vav And it was necessary to have both statements to it No. ??? if of it it was ??? A sin-offering they shall be allowed to die of natural causes and ascend ??? She ??? to it ??? Just as ??? a woman he bought ??? Rav Pappa said: ??? If you wish, I would say ??? to it after and he said to it ??? that do not ??? is a voluntary act ??? The elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering ??? He said to him Shmuel ??? son of ??? No. ??? on ??? until that you said for me ??? the validity and they are four ??? those that are not ??? bread are his and of it that are after ??? that are after atonement of it this one of which we were speaking? are his For it was taught in a baraita Watch out for leading vav "and the man ??? his son ??? And there is no meaning to the word the his wife ??? he built ??? or ??? or ??? they were to him coins ??? coins ??? he is equivalent. A sin-offering shall go to the Sea of Salt he is equivalent. an elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering but the laws of misappropriation apply to them, he is equivalent. peace-offerings ??? peace-offerings and they are eaten ??? one and are not ??? bread that are after death From where do we derive this? as it is taught: ??? coins ??? benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. of them because of that are ??? in all of them peace-offerings did he die they were to him coins ??? coins ??? he is equivalent. A sin-offering he shall carry to the Sea of Salt benefit may not be derived from them, and the laws of misappropriation do not apply. he is equivalent. an elevation-offering ??? an elevation-offering but the laws of misappropriation apply to them, he is equivalent. peace-offerings ??? peace-offerings and they are eaten ??? one and are not ??? bread that are after atonement reason out the logic. he that are after ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? that is not ??? that are after atonement also this one No. ??? And, too, there is not in this case. ??? but the remainder of all ??? a Nazir ??? that did not have ??? are proper and not we go up ??? guilt-obligation and they are eaten ??? one and are not ??? No. bread and not ??? He accounts for that did not have ??? No. ??? they were to him coins ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.