It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף לז,א גמרא

This is satisfactory To me ??? It is because of this: ??? For example, ??? Those who are ill except ??? that you said It is because of this: That there are an olive's volume ??? For souls Those who are ill What then does it mean when it says you shall He said to him: ??? in these times (nowadays) is a law established by the Rabbis Abaye said to him: Watch out for leading vav And from where do you have it that ??? he who has arrived perhaps, to give ??? he who has arrived ??? from the beginning ??? has a problem What then does it mean when it says for he says Rav Dimi ??? for him all ??? he returns He said to him: to give ??? according to ??? for him He said to him: perhaps, to give ??? he who has arrived to account for that which was taught ??? to give ??? Sarah grapes in water and there are of them ??? wine he is liable from here you ??? all ??? for just as a Nazir that do not ??? prohibits the world And there is no meaning to the word ??? prohibits benefit and there are permission ??? One who acts in it ??? the vineyard ??? prohibits the world and their prohibition prohibits ??? And there is no meaning to the word permission ??? is it not logical ??? in it ??? and it is the law ??? in two, He said to him: one of the rabbis Rabbi Abahu and thus he comes to say to R' ??? Which R' ??? Shall I say Rabbi Akiva ??? For it was taught in a baraita Rabbi Akiva says: even Sarah ??? and there are in it so that to combine an olive's volume he is liable And from where do you derive perhaps, he That there are an olive's volume ??? And if you would say what is there to say? To exclude ??? for he said: until ??? wine except Rabbi Akiva ??? as it is taught: Rabbi Akiva says: a Nazir ??? his bread ??? he ate an olive's volume ??? and than wine he is liable He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi to Rabbi ??? that he came ??? for him for this and all ??? to give ??? he learns it ??? Is this not ??? in reality he is forbidden Here in this case, also, there is no difference And the rabbbis ??? No. we complete it ??? he What then does it mean when it says ??? Shall I say That this ??? and that one ??? Sarai and together is forbidden ??? also This ??? Sarai and that one ??? Sarai and together is forbidden except For if it was ??? for him the entire day ??? Sarai ??? for him ??? is forbidden and Rabbi Akiva also meat ??? he except

דף לז,ב גמרא

he learns it ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles for he said: the Merciful One (Num. 31) any thing who ??? in fire This comes to imply ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles Is this not The reason is in reality he is forbidden Here in this case, also, there is no difference and According to the sages, also Watch out for leading vav Is it not enough them ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles He said to him: there i.e., in another mishna ??? he for it is the case that in all the Torah All of it he gives ??? is permitted. and regarding ??? some texts read: worshippers of stars some texts read: gentiles is forbidden and Rabbi Akivah also this one ??? he Rav Huna said son of Chiyya No. ??? Torah except ??? the daughter of day ??? he gives ??? he And the rabbbis ??? the daughter of day also it would be impossible that is not ??? He said to him: Rav Acha the son of of Rav ??? to Rav Ashi According to Rabbinic law, ??? to Rabbi ??? Is this not They said: rabbis This ??? to give ??? from here you ??? for all ??? to Rabbi ??? also that he came ??? for him for this ??? Let us say, from here you ??? for all ??? He said to him It is because of this: that there is a Nazir and A sin-offering two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? those who are coming back ??? yes. ??? a Nazir this one of which we were speaking? A sin-offering Who is it as it is taught: (Lev. 6) all who ??? It is possible Even if that did not have ??? Scripture states: ??? until ??? to be ??? is invalid She ??? and if is valid It may be eaten ??? And the rabbbis It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. For if it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: regarding A sin-offering ??? a Nazir No. will come ??? It is because of this: ??? No. ??? and if Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: regarding a Nazir then I might incorrectly say: ??? No. ??? It is because of this: ??? for even in the case where ??? for him Therefore, No. We come to compare of him and Rabbi Akiva He could say to you for what It was necessary to teach both, because otherwise you might err when extending one to the other. This is satisfactory If it was Therefore, to avoid this incorrect deduction, the Merciful One wrote: A sin-offering No. ??? a Nazir ??? No. we complete it except let the Merciful One write in the Torah ??? A sin-offering of him for it is the case that all ??? And the rabbbis say to you A sin-offering ??? and Those who are ill ??? No. we complete it ??? to give ??? from here you ??? for all ??? and R' ??? both of them. ??? are they, them two ??? those who are coming back ??? and all two ??? that come ??? yes. ??? Rav Ashi said to him for Rav, ??? Watch out for leading vav So rather, how do you explain that which was taught: (Num. 6) from all who may he do it? ??? the wine ??? on ??? a Nazir that are combine together this with that Rabbi Akivah now ??? permission ??? prohibits ??? -- why must that case be taught as well? He said to him permission ??? "At the same time," prohibits ??? even "In the case of this one after that one," and Rabbi Shimon

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.