It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מב,א גמרא

this one ??? shall you do to you ??? Mar said: and all of them ??? that did not have ??? or ??? two ??? No. they make and not anything Rav Acha said the son of of Rav ??? This one says the majority of his body ??? according to Torah law, From where can you derive ??? the Merciful One regarding a Nazir (Num. 6) by day ??? Here in this case, he that until That there are all of it this one in reality the majority of his body ??? He disagreed with this R' Yosi the son of Rabbi Chanina This ??? tamei it is written ??? He ascended in the west ??? a Nazir tamei ??? From where do we derive this? ??? tahor he learns it he shall take a Nazir tahor ??? tamei Just as tamei For ??? two ??? and not anything a slave Here in this case, also, For ??? two ??? and not anything a slave he is required Abaye a Nazir ??? two ??? his head and he returned ??? What then? who ??? or it does not require Raba a Nazir ??? two ??? One ??? One What then? He said to him Rav Acha ??? should bring himself to Raba except I would say ??? One ??? One What then? He said to him ??? yes. here, the gate yes. here, If it was the gate yes. here, ??? there are here, This is what he means: despite the fact ??? yes. here, the commandments ??? yes. here,

דף מב,א משנה

a Nazir ??? but not ???

דף מב,א גמרא

??? with whom does it agree? It is Rabbi Shimon for he said: a thing that do not ??? is permitted. but not ??? According to the sages, But the beginning of the teaching, Rabbi Shimon and the end of the teaching is the rabbis. Rabbah said All of it It is Rabbi Shimon all ???

דף מב,א משנה

Rabbi Yishmael says No. ??? because of ??? ???

דף מב,א גמרא

They posed this difficulty: because of that it ??? ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: or, perhaps, because of ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: for what practical distinction For example, That there are land" that is not ??? If you say, because of that it ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: in a case ??? that is not ??? then the ruling is acceptable. except If you say, because of ??? A general principle: A general principle: No. The question remains suspended and cannot be answered.

דף מב,א משנה

a Nazir that he was drink wine all the day he is not liable except One They said to him: to ??? to ??? This is only in the case drink he is liable on all One and one he was ??? all the day he is not liable except One They said to him: to ??? to ??? This is only in the case ??? he is liable on all One and one he was become tamei ??? all the day he is not liable except One They said to him: to ??? to ??? This is only in the case become tamei he is liable on all One and one

דף מב,ב גמרא

it was said: Rabbah said Rav Huna said the written Torah fill a thing the scripture (Num. 6) No. ??? For as it says: (Num. 6) No. ??? on ??? on ??? but: ??? No. and Rav Yosef said: God Rav Huna said even ??? For Rav Huna said: a Nazir that he was ??? in the house of ??? to him Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? did he die after ??? in it he is liable why is it that this one ??? except Is this not Learn from this Rav Huna said even ??? Abaye a priest that he was to him did he die ??? on ??? to him Watch out for leading vav !! and they died? did he die after ??? in it It is possible ??? he is liable Scripture states: (Lev. 21) and not ??? that is not ??? he has fulfilled his obligation this that he was ??? He said to him ??? to you ??? For it was taught in a baraita he was ??? all the day he is not liable except One They said to him: to ??? to ??? he is liable on all One and one But why? this one ??? except it is a problem ??? There is no difficulty. here, ??? here, that did not have ??? a law established by the Torah this statement that he said poses a contradiction: Rav Isaac bar Joseph Thus said Rabbi ??? Watch out for leading vav And they did not say ??? except ??? and holy offerings but: ??? makes Passover No. And if you say a law established by the Torah what is the difference here, here, ??? a person ??? here, ??? a person ??? but: ??? No. for it is the case that ??? also this one ??? and he arises Rabbi Yochanan said: here, in the house of here, in the field

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.