It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מד,א גמרא

It is possible No. ??? of others is what you say? Do you really mean that? Just as ??? is isolated ??? ??? suspended in it ??? ??? Even all ??? suspended in it ??? ??? this particular also it is Rabbi Yehudah Rav for he said: For This a Tanna taught: as it is taught: It once happened ??? his father of Rabbi Isaac ??? after three years came and He asked R' Yehoshua son of Elisha and four elders ??? And they said ??? at a time i.e., in a case that he was ??? and not at a time i.e., in a case that he was lacking

דף מד,א משנה

three sectarians. are forbidden ??? but that which is coming out from ??? from ??? but that which is coming out from ??? he does not act of demolishing ??? from ??? from ??? No. ??? and shaving ??? a commandment ??? a commandment ??? The entirety and we are guilty on its account sacrifice and shaving It is not ??? except thirty And there is no meaning to the word we are guilty on its account offering

דף מד,א גמרא

??? No. ??? is a kal vachomer than wine for just as wine that is not act of demolishing No. ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? Scripture states: (Lev. 21) ??? and of his mother No. ??? and of his mother No. ??? but: ??? he for a dead person a commandment and wine -- more ??? is a kal vachomer from tumah Just as ??? that it ??? wine that is not act of demolishing is it not logical ??? Scripture states: (Num. 6) than wine and the reward for ??? wine a commandment ??? is a voluntary act and wine ??? The entirety is a kal vachomer from tumah Just as ??? The entirety wine that did not have ??? not all the more so? ??? Scripture states: (Num. 6) the days that are the first ??? For tamei ??? And there is no meaning to the word the wine act of demolishing ??? The entirety is a kal vachomer from tumah for just as ??? that did not have they make of it become tamei ??? The entirety shaving ??? of it ??? is it not logical ??? The entirety Scripture states: the days that are the first ??? For tamei ??? The entirety And there is no meaning to the word shaving ??? The entirety ??? was it made? of it become tamei ??? is a kal vachomer ??? for just as shaving that is not ??? except thirty One who acts of it ??? that it ??? The entirety is it not logical that it was made of it become tamei ??? Scripture states: (Num. 6) and tamei the tip of ??? the tip of ??? and shaving No. was it made? of it ??? is a kal vachomer from tumah for just as ??? that it ??? The entirety No. they make of it become tamei ??? shaving that is not ??? except thirty day is it not all the more so? that did not have was it made? ??? Scripture states: (Num. 6) ??? one does not cross on his head a seminal emission of him. one does not cross he and one does not cross after and shaving No. ??? is a kal vachomer than wine for just as wine that is not act of demolishing No. ??? shaving ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? the Merciful One in the Torah says his head and the Merciful One in the Torah says his beard and shaving No. ??? A general principle: ??? than wine for just as wine that did not have ??? he does not act of demolishing shaving ??? is it not logical that did not have ??? in the case of ??? the gate And that is absent here and wine ??? thirty day is a kal vachomer ??? for just as shaving ??? wine that did not have ??? is it not logical ??? something he The reason is except It is because of this: ??? the gate regarding wine this one ???

דף מד,ב משנה

shaving ??? How so? he was from this on the third ??? and sends ??? and if ??? sends ??? on that very day these are the words of Rabbi Akiva He said to him R' Tarfon Just as between this to a metzorah He said to him this ??? that is hanging ??? and one suffering from tzara'at ??? that is hanging ??? and does not sends sacrifice unless it is he was ??? sun

דף מד,ב גמרא

he accepted it from him. or No. Come and hear: for it teaches: Hallel ??? sends ??? And if it enters your mind to argue that he accepted it from him. he shall take ??? Rabba said: There is no difficulty. this one ??? this one that is not he immersed ??? Abayye said: ??? of Rav he gave son of ??? (Lev. 15) came before Hashem to he opens ??? festival ??? to ??? when does the previous statement apply? he ??? at a time i.e., in a case that he was he immersed One who acts the evening sun yes. No. he immersed One who acts the evening sun No. Perhaps, his reasoning is A tevul yom of One suffering from gonorrhea ??? he is equivalent. I thought to say ??? I Except I can object with text from here: regarding a Nazir tamei also As it is written (Num. 6) ??? two ??? to ??? to he opens ??? festival when does the previous statement apply? he ??? at a time i.e., in a case ??? One who acts the evening sun

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.