It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מז,א משנה

who ??? upon it one from ??? Rabbi Eliezer says: act of demolishing The entirety but the sages say ??? the remainder of ??? "veyithar" They said to him: It once happened ??? upon it one from ??? And they said to her on ??? and the halacha is ??? and the sages said ??? the remainder of ???

דף מז,א גמרא

The tanna teaches: R' Eliezer says: act of demolishing The entirety For didn't R' Eliezer say all after ??? seven act of demolishing Rav said What then does it mean when it says act of demolishing also for he says R' Eliezer act of demolishing ??? Here, too, ??? where he teaches but the sages say ??? the remainder of ??? Learn from this And it once happened also ??? upon it one from ??? on ??? and the halacha is ??? and the sages said ??? the remainder of ??? Learn from this

דף מז,א משנה

the high priest and a Nazir yes. ??? but: ??? for a dead person a commandment they were walking on the way and they found did he die a commandment Rabbi Eliezer says: ??? the high priest and do not ??? a Nazir But the sages say: ??? a Nazir and do not ??? a priest ??? He said to them: Rabbi Eliezer ??? a priest that is not sends sacrifice on ??? and do not ??? a Nazir that he was sends sacrifice on ??? They said to him: ??? a Nazir that do not ??? the sanctity of the world and do not ??? a priest ??? the sanctity of the world

דף מז,א גמרא

This is satisfactory the high priest and a Nazir This reasoned the high priest is preferable and that one reasoned a Nazir is preferable who has been anointed with oil of anointing

דף מז,ב גמרא

is greater than garments who has been anointed with oil of anointing is preferable For this who has been anointed with oil of anointing sends A bull that comes on all the commandments. And even is greater than garments yes. sends who has been anointed that which is in the past is greater than garments is greater than garments is preferable ??? garments does he act? the blessing of the Service And even who has been anointed that which is in the past Is this not son of the blessing of the Service he he crossed ??? and he crossed ??? he crossed ??? is preferable For this This Look, ??? tomorrow And even he crossed ??? No. Look, ??? They posed this difficulty: who has been anointed war ??? Which ??? is preferable who has been anointed war is preferable ??? or, perhaps, viceroy is preferable ??? Come and hear: as it is taught: There is no difference between who has been anointed war ??? except ??? they were walking on the way and they found did he die a commandment ??? who has been anointed war and do not ??? the viceroy ??? who has been anointed war before ??? Mar Zutra said: in the matter of ??? who has been anointed war is preferable What then does it mean when it says ??? of him. many and in the matter of ??? viceroy is preferable as it is taught: Rabbi ??? son of ??? says For what reason ??? viceroy ??? The greatness ??? in it is invalid, Behold! enter ??? beneath it Up to this point, does not disagree except ??? The greatness and a Nazir For ??? together but: one one ??? son of ??? From where do we derive this? ??? (Lev. 21) on all souls did he die No. ??? a bamah an elevated place for offerings. is what the scripture says. If it was ??? he for just as a priest ??? that he was ??? he does not ??? the high priest that is not ??? is it not logical that is not ??? except ??? is what the scripture says. ??? he ??? this one ??? he for a dead person a commandment

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.