It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף מח,א גמרא

and of his mother ??? the value of ??? as it is taught: Rabbi says regarding a Nazir ??? he does not ??? but: ??? he ??? And there is no meaning to the word for me except ??? The greatness from where do we learn is what you say? Do you really mean that? he does not say of its mother ??? that do not Scripture states: for behold! is a kal vachomer he for just as if in a place ??? his brothers? ??? yes. the high priest ??? a place that do not a priest ??? his brothers? ??? is it not logical that do not ??? of his mother if ??? Just as Scripture states: of its mother ??? The greatness ??? from him ??? the value of it is said of its mother ??? and it is said of its mother ??? Just as of its mother is said ??? he does not ??? but: ??? he ??? Even of its mother is said ??? he does not ??? but: ??? a Nazir From where do we derive this? as it is taught: (Num. 6) all my days: ??? to Hashem on ??? did he die No. ??? listen I Even if ??? livestock ??? In the same essential way as it is said (Lev. 24) ??? livestock Scripture states: on ??? did he die No. ??? a person is what the scripture says. R' Yishmael says it is not necessary for him Behold! he says No. ??? is what the scripture says. ??? and of his mother he does not ??? but: ??? he for a dead person a commandment before it was even the case that it is said there are for me In justice, for just as ??? the sanctity of the world ??? for a dead person a commandment a Nazir that do not ??? the sanctity of the world is it not logical ??? for a dead person a commandment No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? which provides he does not sends sacrifice on ??? shall you say ??? sacrifice on ??? Because and sends sacrifice on ??? No. ??? for a dead person a commandment Scripture states: ??? and of his mother No. ??? but: ??? for a dead person a commandment Or perhaps, ??? and of his mother but: ??? the dead is what you say? Do you really mean that? is a kal vachomer for just as a priest ??? he does not ??? the dead a Nazir that is not ??? is it not logical that did not have ???

דף מח,ב גמרא

this one Just as Scripture states: ??? and of his mother ??? and of his mother he that is not ??? but: ??? he for a dead person a commandment before it was even the case that it is said there are for me In justice, ??? Just as ??? that are said ??? he does not ??? but: ??? for a dead person a commandment Even ??? that are said ??? he does not ??? but: ??? for a dead person a commandment or ??? on the way -- this refers to ??? Just as ??? that are said ??? Even ??? that are said ??? Scripture states: ??? and of his mother No. ??? this one for a dead person a commandment ??? this one should bring himself to say that do not ??? except ??? to say that do not ??? his brothers? he does not ??? this one for a dead person a commandment ??? and of his mother ??? the value of ??? to account for that which was taught ??? Just as Scripture states: Behold! ??? ??? his son and he heard ??? to him did he die It is possible ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. ??? It is possible No. ??? for a dead person a commandment Scripture states: ??? he ??? this one for a dead person a commandment ??? Rabbi Akiva says: souls these ??? did he die these ??? and of his mother he does not ??? but: ??? he for a dead person a commandment his brothers? ??? he was ??? This is only in the case a Nazir his brothers? he does not ??? but: ??? he for a dead person a commandment ??? As it is taught: Behold! that he was walks ??? ??? his son etc. and to Rebbi ??? the value of of Rabbi ??? He could say to you immediately As Mar said: if he was ??? and a Nazir his brothers? he does not ??? but: ??? he for a dead person a commandment What do I have to learn from ??? What do I have to learn from a Nazir ??? and to Rebbi Yishmael the high priest This is only in the case a Nazir ??? immediately ??? the Merciful One one Is this not regarding did he die a commandment What do I have to learn from one Is this not What do I have to learn from ??? why do I have You might have thought that I would say that For ??? the Merciful One for a dead person a commandment a Nazir and a priest which is a prohibition ??? he but: ??? Passover ??? No. ??? for a dead person a commandment Come and learn from this.

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.