It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נו,א גמרא

he eats ??? after ??? day and drink wine ??? after hundred and twenty day It was taught by He ascended Regarding what matters are we speaking? ??? but: ??? the daughter of year" he eats ??? after two two and drink wine ??? after four two and if You might have thought ??? for him ??? for him ??? two and thirty day And furthermore, He challenged this "He" meaning... Rav Ashi yes. for me except my days: ??? that do not we go up to him from ??? my days: ??? from where do we learn It would be a logical inference my days: ??? and sends sacrifice and the days of ??? and sends sacrifice Just as my days: ??? yes. we go up to him from ??? Even my days: ??? yes. we go up to him from ??? No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? in the days of ??? which provides nullify of them ??? shall you say in the days of ??? that do not nullify of them ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? ??? he for just as a Nazir in the grave ??? euphemisms for nazarite vows yes. we go up to him from ??? my days: ??? that do not ??? euphemisms for nazarite vows is it not all the more so? And there is no meaning to the word for me except my days: ??? my days: ??? from where do we learn It would be a logical inference

דף נו,ב גמרא

Just as my days: ??? required shaving Even my days: ??? for just as my days: ??? yes. we go up to him from ??? Even my days: ??? It is possible Even my days: ??? thus and justice. he gives ??? become tamei ??? and of dwelling and the days of ??? become tamei ??? and of dwelling if ??? that do not we go up to him from ??? Even my days: ??? yes. we go up to him from ??? is what you say? Do you really mean that? No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? in the days of ??? which provides ??? required shaving and sends sacrifice For this reason yes. we go up shall you say in the days of ??? that do not required shaving and does not sends sacrifice For this reason they went up to ??? from here my days: said ??? and the days of ??? yes. we go up to him from ??? but: my days: ??? of one suffering from tzara'at Behold! these we go up to him The tanna teaches: Regardless, No. if is what you say? Do you really mean that? in the days of ??? which provides nullify of them ??? shall you say in the days of ??? in what way Shall I say ??? this one in the case of ??? the gate except Is this not ??? is greater than And we have learned that do not we go up to him from ??? Perhaps, No. ??? for him Learn from this

דף נו,ב משנה

he said Rabbi Eliezer It is because of this: R' Yehoshua all ??? from the dead ??? upon it we are guilty on its account on ??? make kiddush. and all ??? from the dead that do not ??? upon it yes. we are guilty on its account on ??? make kiddush. Thus said Rabbi ??? she will not be -- this refers to lightweight from ???

דף נו,ב גמרא

and Rabbi Eliezer It is because of this: Rabbi Yehoshua ??? to it Hey, isn't it the case that It is because of this: Rabbi Yehoshua son of ??? to it as it is taught: he said Rabbi Eliezer ??? R' Yehoshua son of ??? the tip of that he was who dwells ??? before ??? in matters of halacha. all ??? from the dead ??? upon it we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? make kiddush. and all ??? from the dead that do not ??? upon it yes. we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? make kiddush. He said to him: to shall be -- this refers to lightweight ??? I said to him: anything you ??? Joshua son of ??? He said to me: there are. thus said for me Rabbi Yehoshua son of ??? It is because of this: Rabbi Yehoshua all ??? from the dead ??? upon it he is liable upon it It is because of this: ??? make kiddush. and all ??? from the dead that do not ??? upon it yes. we are guilty on its account It is because of this: ??? make kiddush. you shall It is because of this: Rabbi Yehoshua son of ??? to it And they said Learn from this all that he brought ??? three ??? say ??? we do not say Rav Nachman bar Yitzchak said Even We also ??? he said ??? thus in the same way ??? from ??? from the prophets, The halacha is to Moses ??? Sabbath ??? with the passage of the requisite number of years and three ??? from all one and one And even Joshua ??? No. ??? Learn from this

דף נו,ב משנה

Rabbi Akiva said my ruling? before Rabbi Eliezer Just as if ??? that is not become tamei a person ??? on ??? and on ??? blood that he was become tamei a person ??? is it not logical that it should be ??? on ??? and on ??? He said to me: Just as this ??? yes. ??? here, From a "kal vachomer", When I went and repeated these words before Rabbi Yehoshua He said to me: proper is what you say? Do you really mean that? except thus And they said The halacha is

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.