It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף נח,א גמרא

It is possible Even one suffering from tzara'at thus Scripture states: his head And another teaching his head Just as Scripture states: on account of as it is said regarding a Nazir (Num. 6) ??? one does not cross on his head It is possible Even a Nazir one suffering from tzara'at thus Scripture states: his head Is this not ??? She ??? his reasoning is ??? all ??? No. her name ??? And so he came he read ??? No. shall you do One who acts And the other one reasoned ??? all ??? her name ??? And so he came he read ??? Is this not ??? Rabba said: ??? all ??? No. her name ??? And so he came he read For example, ??? and in the end ??? immediately For this ??? it is dealing with a case where there is only one. ??? No. ??? For ??? and in the end ??? also No. ??? and who the writing of he read thus For didn't ??? say in all places where you finds One who acts ??? if you It is possible to establish both that is good for him And if not, ??? One who acts ??? ??? except ??? all ??? her name ??? and one ??? One who acts Is this not ??? he learns it ??? For scripture said: (Deut. 22) No. ??? and it was taught: No. ??? this one ??? shall you do to you from them and one ??? for him ??? What is the reason מאי טעמא No. ??? for him ??? He could say to you ??? he who has arrived of Raba pointed out a contradiction. it is written (Num. 15) and were given on fringes, "the corner ??? a thread" ??? and then it is written (Deut. 22) wool ??? How so? wool ??? between ??? between that did not have ??? the remainder of sectarians. ??? that did not have ??? yes. ??? and that one a Tanna taught: ??? One who acts ??? No. shall you do One who acts From where do we derive this? ??? for him ??? as it is taught: his beard Just as Scripture states: on account of as it is said (Lev. 21) ??? No. ??? It is possible Even a priest one suffering from tzara'at thus Scripture states: his beard and one ??? for him ??? and not shall you do ??? to us in reality

דף נח,ב גמרא

that is not will come One who acts ??? ??? One who acts ??? except ??? No. ??? Just as ??? which provides Is this not that is not the value of in all a Nazir ??? also No. he learns it which provides Is this not that is not the value of in all and one ??? for this his head ??? why do I have his beard should bring himself to account for that which was taught his beard Just as Scripture states: on account of as it is said ??? No. ??? It is possible Even a priest one suffering from tzara'at thus Scripture states: his beard From where do we derive this? ??? as it is taught: ??? No. ??? It is possible Even ??? he is liable Scripture states: and not ??? If it was No. ??? It is possible ??? he is liable Scripture states: ??? No. ??? What is ??? in which there is in it ??? you shall says this ??? and one ??? for him for this his head ??? why do I have ??? his head why do I have ??? his beard ??? Is this not ??? One who acts ??? he ??? a priest ??? No. he learns it which provides ??? a Nazir ??? No. he learns it which provides Is this not that is not the value of in all and in reality No. ??? It is because of this: That there are ??? Rav said ??? a person the entire body ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? the house of ??? the house of ??? Behold! this ??? this one ??? this one ??? Hey, isn't it the case that Rav also ??? he comes to say i.e., what he really means is: similar to ??? he said Rabbi Chiyya bar Abba Rabbi Yochanan said: ??? the house of ??? the house of ??? They challenged him from this teaching: ??? It is not in words of Torah except in words of ??? What then does it mean when it says ??? also for he says According to Rabbinic law,

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.