It's a start Dafcast Draft
ברכות
שבת
עירובין
פסחים
ראש השנה
יומא
סוכה
ביצה
תענית
מגילה
מועד קטן
חגיגה
יבמות
כתובות
נדרים
נזיר
סוטה
גיטין
קידושין
בבא קמא
בבא מציעא
בבא בתרא
סנהדרין
מכות
שבועות
עבודה זרה
הוריות
זבחים
מנחות
חולין
בכורות
ערכין
תמורה
כריתות
מעילה
תמיד
נידה

PREVIEW OF THE DAFCAST WEBSITE FOR CYCLE 13

Please do not forward this link around yet! This is still in development and will be "released", God willing, on August 1, in time for the thirteenth cycle of Daf Yomi.

Disclaimers, Copyright, and Credits

Disclaimers

This is an early draft. I haven't proofread; there are plenty of typos and probably some more significant errors as well.
Most pages on this site are currently auto-translated. The autotranslations are intended as a starting point for my manual translations. At best, they are awkward stringing-togethers of words and phrases in the corpus database that can benefit from cleaning up. At worst, they are picking the wrong homograph. Auto-translations are indicated by italics.
I am not a rabbi or an expert. These are my translations, and in some cases I am certainly misunderstanding things.
The Talmud is a document of its time. While the Talmud is a foundational document of Judaism, it must be read in its historical context. There are passages that are xenophobic, sexist, and irreconcilable with modern science. Not everything in these pages represents contemporary Judaism.

Copyright

This translation is protected by copyright. I'm putting a lot of effort into this project. Please respect that by only copying with my permission.
I intend to provide free licenses for most uses. I plan to use a Creative Commons CC-NC-BY-SA license, which will allow you to re-use my translations as long as you don't charge money for them (NC), as long as you give me credit (BY), and as long as you make your derived work available under the same terms (SA). But I'm not ready to do that yet because this is still a very rough work-in-progress.
In the meantime, if you want to re-use this, please contact me. I am willing to discuss re-use on an ad hoc basis. Perhaps the one page you want to use is actually ready for re-use. Ask. I'll probably work out a way to say "yes."

Credits

I need to clean up this section. But for now, I'll note that I've made use of the Hebrew/Aramaic text of the Bavli at Mechon Mamre; Jastrow's dictionary; "The Practical Talmud Dictionary" by Yitzchak Frank. I've also used the big three translations of the Talmud --- Soncino (English), Artscroll (English), and Steinsaltz (Hebrew) --- and the Kehati (English) edition of the Mishna, to help me understand passages before translating them.
Go to daf 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66
Or set your preferences to change how Hebrew/Aramaic is displayed.

דף ו,א גמרא

except for there to be wheat ??? it is a problem He could say to you son of ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, and if ??? ??? thirty ??? ??? except at the end of the teaching, ??? for him But the beginning of the teaching, in the case of one who says ??? and for Rav, ??? it is a problem at the end of the teaching, Rav would say to you ??? at the end of the teaching, day thirty an elevation-offering ??? Who is it a small portion of the day ??? this one he said one ??? What would you have said? that is only in the case lit., "these words" הני מילי in the matter of one euphemisms for nazarite vows but: to have two euphemisms for nazarite vows No. Come and learn from this. We have learnt in a Mishna: if ??? day ??? lacking one he has fulfilled his obligation ??? thirty an elevation-offering to him from ??? This is satisfactory for Rav, ??? it's settled. except for there to be wheat ??? why do I have this statement that he said poses a contradiction: thirty lacking one He could say to you I also to this other teaching ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: who who said ??? a Nazir ??? day thirty act of demolishing The entirety This is satisfactory for Rav, ??? it's settled. except for there to be wheat ??? it is a problem

דף ו,ב גמרא

He could say to you son of ??? I would say at the end of the teaching, Rabbi Eliezer says: he does not act of demolishing except seven If it was You might have thought thirty in the case of ??? all of them his reasoning is Rabbi Eliezer a small portion of the day ??? We have learnt in a Mishna: ??? a Nazir hundred day ??? day hundred act of demolishing The entirety Rabbi Eliezer says: he does not act of demolishing except thirty day and if You might have thought reasoned Rabbi Eliezer a small portion of the day ??? seven and if No. reasoned a small portion of the day ??? all of them In reality lit: In the world we do not say a small portion of the day ??? If so, ??? all of them Raysh Lakish said we were The reason is of Rabbi Eliezer Scripture states: (Num. 6) this ??? by day ??? my days: ??? the Torah he said ??? by day ??? give to him ??? a Nazir Let us say, ??? (Num. 6) until ??? the days ??? days two Scripture states: ??? it shall be greatness ??? yes. ??? the gate less than ??? these are the words of Rabbi ??? Rabbi ??? says it is not necessary for him Behold! he says until ??? the days If it was These are days ??? to draw you shall says thirty Is this not Rav ??? for he said: like Rabbi ??? and bar ??? for he said: like Rabbi ??? Rav would say to you ??? the whole world thirty in the case of and here in this other case, ??? and until are in the general category ??? Rabbi ??? reasoned until and not until are in the general category And Rabbi ??? reasoned until and until are in the general category Mar said: If it was These are days ??? to draw you shall says thirty and so go ahead and say Sabbath Sabbath who that it is possible ???

Copyright © 2012 Andrew Marc Greene. All rights reserved.